OT:Just because

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

adarbrauner
Posts: 1523
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: OT:Just because

Post by adarbrauner »

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

Absolutely nothing wrong with that. I've had much worse than that. Especially here on this forum. Why just the other day , "somebody" suggested that I be sold for scrap. No buyers though. [:D]


that was an act of love [X(]
[X(]
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14527
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: OT:Just because

Post by AW1Steve »

ORIGINAL: adarbrauner

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

Absolutely nothing wrong with that. I've had much worse than that. Especially here on this forum. Why just the other day , "somebody" suggested that I be sold for scrap. No buyers though. [:D]


that was an act of love [X(]
[X(]
Which part? The offer to sell, or the desire NOT to buy? [:D]
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20555
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT:Just because

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".




Image
Actually, the trees around here just shut down for the winter and are not making any more oxygen. We have to hold our breath for a looooooong time!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20555
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT:Just because

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".

And? What's wrong with that? [:D]
Because it actually makes the other person get their back up and stop listening to your ideas, so you end up with no communication happening (like the current politics in some countries). Same advice goes for eschewing pejorative words in favour of neutral ones, and acknowledging that you have heard the other person's argument but have differing thoughts. Dismissing the other guy outright will shut down any hope of having a conversation.

There, you just got the gist of an entire day's seminar! No need to thank me because you probably will not feel the need to anyway! [8D]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: OT:Just because

Post by rustysi »

so you end up with no communication happening (like the current politics in some countries)

Hey, hey, hey.... Watch that maple boy!!!!![:D]
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Canoerebel »

Chick-fil-A followed that idea. CFA employees reply "My pleasure," when a customer says, "Thank you." CFA implemented this because it previously it was common for young employees to respond with a courteous, "No problem." But CFA correctly understood that "No problem" actually strikes people as "It was a problem" (or hassle).
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20555
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT:Just because

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Actually a good post, Fred. [:D]
Actually, it was! He did not use the word "actually" while disagreeing with anyone, he just used it as an adjective to emphasize his not having been there nor had hands on experience with the weapons. Those uses of the word are not pejorative nor insulting.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: OT:Just because

Post by rustysi »

But CFA correctly understood that "No problem" actually strikes people as "It was a problem" (or hassle).

Never took that expression to mean that.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by MakeeLearn »

"No problem"

Image
Attachments
maxresdefault.jpg
maxresdefault.jpg (61.21 KiB) Viewed 241 times






User avatar
alaviner
Posts: 764
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:49 pm
Location: Blacksburg, Va

RE: OT:Just because

Post by alaviner »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Actually a good post, Fred. [:D]
Actually, it was! He did not use the word "actually" while disagreeing with anyone, he just used it as an adjective to emphasize his not having been there nor had hands on experience with the weapons. Those uses of the word are not pejorative nor insulting.

Actually, "neither" would be a better word than the underlined "not"[8D] [:D][8D]
Image

User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".

And? What's wrong with that? [:D]
Because it actually makes the other person get their back up and stop listening to your ideas, so you end up with no communication happening (like the current politics in some countries). Same advice goes for eschewing pejorative words in favour of neutral ones, and acknowledging that you have heard the other person's argument but have differing thoughts. Dismissing the other guy outright will shut down any hope of having a conversation.

There, you just got the gist of an entire day's seminar! No need to thank me because you probably will not feel the need to anyway! [8D]

I agree. About the felt need to thank you. [;)]

I have heard your argument but have differing thoughts.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Chick-fil-A followed that idea. CFA employees reply "My pleasure," when a customer says, "Thank you." CFA implemented this because it previously it was common for young employees to respond with a courteous, "No problem." But CFA correctly understood that "No problem" actually strikes people as "It was a problem" (or hassle).

If one wanted parsimony and picayune dissection of verbatim language throughout the world, one can come up with myriad examples of where the words spoken are different than the meaning conveyed. A "you're welcome" in the Spanish speaking world is "de nada"-"it was nothing". This is not considered informal or brusque. Remarkably similar to the "no problem" non-issue with today's youth. While it is ALWAYS acceptable to say "you're welcome", it's also best to not look for linguistic slights where none was intended.

Hence the false umbrage about "actually" amongst those being overly sensitive. I'm not aware of anyone who interprets the use of that adverb in a sentence as a pejorative insult or slight. You show me non-inflammatory common parlance that inflames a select audience of the easily offended and I'll show you an opportunity for a well-paying day-long conference for the politically correct linguist market.
Image
adarbrauner
Posts: 1523
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: OT:Just because

Post by adarbrauner »

What's Chick fil A ?
(ok, google it...)
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: rustysi
But CFA correctly understood that "No problem" actually strikes people as "It was a problem" (or hassle).

Never took that expression to mean that.

Me neither. Beware the corporate-speak that turns customers into relationship clientele, waitresses into experience guides and employees into service experts.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: adarbrauner

What's Chick fil A ?
(ok, google it...)

Actually...[:D]...it's the finest purveyor of all edible things chicken-themed. Their nuggets are the stuff of legend.
Image
User avatar
Leandros
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:03 pm
Contact:

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Leandros »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Actually, it was! He did not use the word "actually" while disagreeing with anyone, he just used it as an adjective to emphasize his not having been there nor had hands on experience with the weapons. Those uses of the word are not pejorative nor insulting.
Don't overdo it now....what's "pejorative".....[&:].....?

Fred
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book on Operation Sea Lion - www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - a book series on how The Philippines were saved - in 1942! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Zorch »

I'd like to interrupt this mutual admiration society for a healthy dose of reality...but I'm having way too much fun.
anarchyintheuk
Posts: 3958
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: OT:Just because

Post by anarchyintheuk »

That actually settles where I'm eating tonight.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: OT:Just because

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Zorch

I'd like to interrupt this mutual admiration society for a healthy dose of reality...but I'm having way too much fun.
warspite1

Don't let Mrs Zorch hear you say that......
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Zorch

I'd like to interrupt this mutual admiration society for a healthy dose of reality...but I'm having way too much fun.
warspite1

Don't let Mrs Zorch hear you say that......
No problem - There is no longer a Mrs Zorch.[;)]
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”