Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. Allied #4. USN. Bismarck Sea. Naval Battle. Round 1.

It's a disaster for the USN ... the second one this turn. With nothing really left to lose the USN and RN forces stay.

Image
Attachments
04ALUSN..SeaRD1.jpg
04ALUSN..SeaRD1.jpg (1.39 MiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 2. Searches.

Round 2 searches in the Bismarck Sea also go the Japanese way.

Instructions?

Image
Attachments
04ALUSN..SeaRD2a.jpg
04ALUSN..SeaRD2a.jpg (325.65 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 2. Searches.

Round 2 searches in the Bismarck Sea also go the Japanese way.

Instructions?
Debated avoiding, but in the end the transport is too tempting.
Engage the 1-box only. Use 2 SP to reduce AA to ne.
Use remaining SP to increase damage and target the transport.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 2.

Brutal for the USN, but could have been a lot worse. The USN TRS and BB both survived their damage rolls.

Image
Attachments
04ALUSN..SeaRD2.jpg
04ALUSN..SeaRD2.jpg (915.02 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 3.

The USN stays for another potential round; however, both search rolls fail (allies 9, axis 8).
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. IJN Intercept Attempt. The Solomons.

An IJN sub unit attempts, but fails, to intercept the unescorted Yorktown on it's way back to Pearl Harbor.

Image
Attachments
04ALIJN..Attempt.jpg
04ALIJN..Attempt.jpg (228.66 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USN/RN. Attempted Naval Combat. Bay of Biscay.

Search rolls, allies 8, axis 5. Neither side finds.

Image
Attachments
04ALUSN..fBiscay.jpg
04ALUSN..fBiscay.jpg (366.76 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USMC. Amphibious Invasion of Eniwetok.

Folks this is the USMC 1st marine division! The same division that was featured in the HBO mini-series, "The Pacific".

Image
Attachments
04ALUSMCEniwetok.jpg
04ALUSMCEniwetok.jpg (233.08 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USSR. Main Front.

Not good.

Image
Attachments
04ALUSSR.jpg
04ALUSSR.jpg (1.32 MiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USSR. The Caucuses.

I don't know the exact rule but my guess is is that Turkey is REAL close to coming in on the side of the axis. [&:]

Image
Attachments
04ALUSSRCacucses.jpg
04ALUSSRCacucses.jpg (960.97 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Axis #5. Weather.

Well, I must say that weather roll was a bit of a break for the allies.

Image
Attachments
05AXWeather.jpg
05AXWeather.jpg (167.13 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

Germany needs to get 4 German corps units on the USSR-Turkey border. That means the 4-3 Rumanian MTN won't count.

There are 4 German corps that could do that fairly easily, ... if the Russian units would just get out of the way,
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

Germany needs to get 4 German corps units on the USSR-Turkey border. That means the 4-3 Rumanian MTN won't count.

There are 4 German corps that could do that fairly easily, ... if the Russian units would just get out of the way,
I have a feeling that Pat will force the issue even if they don't "voluntary" move aside. [:)]
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Commentary: Yes, I plan on forcing the issue. It would have been easier if the weather had not turned.

MJ 43 i5
Options: Germany and Italy take combined actions. Japan takes a land action.

Italy moves a transport out to the E. Med and picks up the 4-1 GAR (stops in the 2-box). The Germans moved the Romanian CP to the Black Sea.

Italy searched in the E. Med and the rolls were 7/9 so no contact.

Two ground strikes, one in Siberia with the lowest strength JP bomber and one on your southernmost stack on the Iberian Peninsula (image below). Do you wish to intercept?

Image
Attachments
MJ43i5GSoptions.jpg
MJ43i5GSoptions.jpg (2.1 MiB) Viewed 193 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Intercept with the USAF P-38F Lightening and the CVP with the highest air-to-air. Put theP-38F in the lead and stay until the status of the bomber is determined.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MJ43 i5 Ground Strikes.
The air combat was bloody. The US lost two plans, but no pilots. The Italians lost a fighter and the pilot. The bomber made it through and hit one target.

Image
Attachments
MJ43i5GSresults.jpg
MJ43i5GSresults.jpg (2.42 MiB) Viewed 193 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Note, during the movement phase the German XX Corp moved into Batum and then back to the swamp, forcing the RU fleet to rebase. I made the decision for you that the best of the two options for rebasing was Odessa (the other port will likely be overrun in my next impulse.
The corp was disorganized and I had hoped to reorg it with air transport, but I had forgotten that it cost two reorg points during a combined. So, it remains flipped at this moment.

Image
Attachments
MJ43i5Ba..ituation.jpg
MJ43i5Ba..ituation.jpg (2.52 MiB) Viewed 193 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #7. Actions.

Image
Attachments
07ALActions.jpg
07ALActions.jpg (462.57 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #7. End of Turn Check.

Well, nothing from the allies to report this impulse. About all they did was to push a few units around on the map.

The turn continues.

Image
Attachments
07ALEOT.jpg
07ALEOT.jpg (104.88 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30951
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Axis #9. Weather.

Fighting weather returns ... which isn't good news for the allies, especially the Soviets.

Image
Attachments
09AXWeather.jpg
09AXWeather.jpg (166.64 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”