Field of Glory Napoleonics?

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

aaatoysandmore
Posts: 2846
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:35 pm

RE: Field of Glory Napoleonics?

Post by aaatoysandmore »

ORIGINAL: tanespain

I - and some wargamers more, I think- am not looking for strategical Napoleonics, or quasi-tactical (Battleground), but for a similar scale as the Field of Glory games.

And at that scale, no, there is not a lot of games :(

Battles of Napoleon circa 1980's and it still works on modern computers with DosBox. May not have the pretty graphics of FOGII but a good rendition just the same. [:'(]

Then today you have Norbsoft's Napoleonics series and Fields of Glory from the early 90's. So yes you are ahead of the scope when it comes to Napoleonics wargames. It doesn't have to be identical to be too many. [:'(]
User avatar
Agathosdaimon
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:42 am

RE: Field of Glory Napoleonics?

Post by Agathosdaimon »

ORIGINAL: tanespain

I - and some wargamers more, I think- am not looking for strategical Napoleonics, or quasi-tactical (Battleground), but for a similar scale as the Field of Glory games.

And at that scale, no, there is not a lot of games :(
actually apart from teh JTS games, there have been some other napoleonic games of late from Hexwar, which are tactical turn based but i think they are only on mobile platform still, i wouldnt be surprised if they appear on steam eventually, they had a peninsular campaign, russian campaign and waterloo campaign and they make for a bit of light fun.

Does anyone recall the "Napoleon's Battles" game from around 2001 or so - it ended up being a free cd in the boxed copy of Eric Youngs Squad Assault, - possibly the worst ever tactical napoleonic game made,(though still better than much of cheap asset flip garbage on steam)
User avatar
TDefender
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:29 pm

RE: Field of Glory Napoleonics?

Post by TDefender »

ORIGINAL: Agathosdaimon

actually apart from teh JTS games, there have been some other napoleonic games of late from Hexwar, which are tactical turn based but i think they are only on mobile platform still, i wouldnt be surprised if they appear on steam eventually, they had a peninsular campaign, russian campaign and waterloo campaign and they make for a bit of light fun.

I have a couple of them, good games but just for "very easy and relaxing time" (yes, expecially that kind of moments...) not else.

I really would enjoy something more similar to an evolution of the old Napoleon 1813 a buggy but very interesting game .
User avatar
Agathosdaimon
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:42 am

RE: Field of Glory Napoleonics?

Post by Agathosdaimon »

ORIGINAL: TDefender
ORIGINAL: Agathosdaimon

actually apart from teh JTS games, there have been some other napoleonic games of late from Hexwar, which are tactical turn based but i think they are only on mobile platform still, i wouldnt be surprised if they appear on steam eventually, they had a peninsular campaign, russian campaign and waterloo campaign and they make for a bit of light fun.

I have a couple of them, good games but just for "very easy and relaxing time" (yes, expecially that kind of moments...) not else.

I really would enjoy something more similar to an evolution of the old Napoleon 1813 a buggy but very interesting game .

you have my absolute agreement! Wargamer: Napoleon 1813, made by Steven Green (who was also behind the old microprose Field of Glory) is the greatest napoleonic game that almost was - if Scourge of War took up the 1813 campaign it would be the greatest, though i guess that is getting away from the Turn-based style that is the main topic here
aaatoysandmore
Posts: 2846
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:35 pm

RE: Field of Glory Napoleonics?

Post by aaatoysandmore »

I like Norbsoft's games as they are more command and control than having to move every individual unit though you can if you take up the Army command. I like to take a regiment or battery and play; dealing with the orders the ai sends me (usually right into the thick of things) and find those types most enjoyable.

Someday we may see Napoleonics in Fog2 but, not any time soon I would think. They have a lot of history to go through before they get to Napoleonics unless they bypass a lot of history which I don't recall them doing in FogI.
User avatar
Agathosdaimon
Posts: 1051
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 2:42 am

RE: Field of Glory Napoleonics?

Post by Agathosdaimon »

ORIGINAL: aaatoysandmore

I like Norbsoft's games as they are more command and control than having to move every individual unit though you can if you take up the Army command. I like to take a regiment or battery and play; dealing with the orders the ai sends me (usually right into the thick of things) and find those types most enjoyable.

Someday we may see Napoleonics in Fog2 but, not any time soon I would think. They have a lot of history to go through before they get to Napoleonics unless they bypass a lot of history which I don't recall them doing in FogI.

well thats fin by me, i mean you are right FoG have alot and i would welcome more Renaissance and 17th-18th century too. I have for now too many games and not enough time, even less with a 5 month old now to look after, so really this is all just a bit of delighting in fantasy of what could possibly be and i am sure eventually will come to be
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”