LF advice about a scenario vs PO

The sequel of the legendary wargame with a complete graphics and interface overhaul, major new gameplay and design features such as full naval combat modelling, improved supply handling, numerous increases to scenario parameters to better support large scenarios, and integrated PBEM++.
Post Reply
jjdenver
Posts: 2480
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:07 pm

LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by jjdenver »

Hi,

I'd like to play a scenario vs the PO. My preference is for large/monster scenarios. I'm intrigued by the various Indo-China/Vietname scenarios, the Iran-Iraq war, and all of the east front large scenarios as well as the full WW2 scenarios europe in flames, etc.

Can someone suggest or rank some of these scenarios and any others that you love that will play well vs a PO and also which sides work for human vs PO? I don't want to sink many hours in just to find that play vs the PO is a dud.

Thanks
AARS:
CEAW-BJR Mod 2009:
tm.asp?m=2101447
AT-WW1:
tm.asp?m=1705427
AT-GPW:
tm.asp?m=1649732
Meyer1
Posts: 931
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by Meyer1 »

Directive 21 vs the soviet PO: large-monster-east front, all check [:)]

Never played it myself but heard great things about it. Also is very popular and so tested.

jjdenver
Posts: 2480
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:07 pm

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by jjdenver »

Thanks Meyer. I read through the documentation for Directive 21 and it seems like it might be overwhelming as German for an inexperienced player. The docs say the soviet force will get out of control (paraphrasing) if certain important cities aren't taken on time...or something to that effect so maybe I'd better find a scenario that isn't intended for expert players.

Any idea if any of the WW2 full war scenarios like:
Europe at war 1939-45
Third Reich 1943-45
World at War 1939-45
Sino-Japanese War 1937-45

or these:
Boonie Rats 65-72
Indochina 1951-55
Vietnam 65-68

are good vs PO from either/both sides?

Thanks
AARS:
CEAW-BJR Mod 2009:
tm.asp?m=2101447
AT-WW1:
tm.asp?m=1705427
AT-GPW:
tm.asp?m=1649732
User avatar
Silvanski
Posts: 2511
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Belgium, residing in TX-USA

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by Silvanski »

Will post a converted/updated version of my Alternate History scenario-mod Europa 1947 soon... Both sides PO enabled, large 25 km/hex map covering Europe, North Africa and the Middle East... over a 1000 units per side, no Theater Options needed, lots of events in place which handle supply, reinforcements, wihdrawals etc
The TOAW Redux Dude
Meyer1
Posts: 931
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by Meyer1 »

ORIGINAL: jjdenver

Thanks Meyer. Any idea if any of the WW2 full war scenarios like:
Europe at war 1939-45
Third Reich 1943-45
World at War 1939-45
Sino-Japanese War 1937-45

Checking the briefings, looks like all of these are PBEM only.


[/quote]
jjdenver
Posts: 2480
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:07 pm

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by jjdenver »

Thanks. I looked at TGW 1941-1945 and the briefing says:
"PBEM with PO for both forces"

Does this mean the PO can play axis or allies? Or does it mean you can play PBEM and set part of your forces to be run by the PO instead of running them yourself?
AARS:
CEAW-BJR Mod 2009:
tm.asp?m=2101447
AT-WW1:
tm.asp?m=1705427
AT-GPW:
tm.asp?m=1649732
Meyer1
Posts: 931
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:01 pm

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by Meyer1 »

ORIGINAL: jjdenver

Thanks. I looked at TGW 1941-1945 and the briefing says:
"PBEM with PO for both forces"

Does this mean the PO can play axis or allies? Or does it mean you can play PBEM and set part of your forces to be run by the PO instead of running them yourself?
Hmmm I don't PBEM so your second question is interesting... but the answer for the first one is yes, you could play against the computer as the Germans or the Soviets.
Raindem
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Arizona

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by Raindem »

Campaign for South Vietnam, 1965-75 is playable against the PO from either side.
Grab them by the balls. Their hearts and minds will follow.
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42830
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by larryfulkerson »

You may already know this but I'm doing an AAR with D21 as my subject and I'm having a blast.

AND I don't think it's all that complicated. Just bigger. And it's got a SOVIET PO.
It's FITE with a PO to play against. What could possibly go wrong.
I'm having more fun than a cat on a five hole bird house.
Bringing Catch-22 To Life in the Mexico Desert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyPr2n6N0aU
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42830
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: LF advice about a scenario vs PO

Post by larryfulkerson »

ORIGINAL: Raindem
Campaign for South Vietnam, 1965-75 is playable against the PO from either side.
CSV is one of my favorites, maybe because I'm in the game at Bien Hoa.
At any rate, I'm thinking it might be a little more complicated for the rank
beginner. What with the EEV to care about. But hey, intelligence matters and
if you can handle the concept then yeah, get after it. It was new to me and
confusing at first but working with it and watching how it works makes sense
now. It's not easy but it's doable.
Bringing Catch-22 To Life in the Mexico Desert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyPr2n6N0aU
Post Reply

Return to “The Operational Art of War IV”