Islands of Destiny: RA 5.0 Japanese Side

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

Thank You John.

Anybody else have anything to add?
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: March 1945

Post by Capt. Harlock »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Thank You John.

Anybody else have anything to add?

Yes. To be pedantic, you hit the destroyer USS Twining (DD-540). Irving was the name for the Japanese plane. Mind you, Twining was a Fletcher-class, so putting her hors de combat is a good thing.
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

Do you think that amazing event will turn the events of the war???

I bet so. How could I have missed.

That is it. I am declaring victory, picking up my marbles, and going home. YES!
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

Turn Sent.

I brought in five 49 Plane Tony-100 Sentai. They were told to SWEEP and kill enemy fighters...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
SierraJuliet
Posts: 2430
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Tasmania

RE: March 1945

Post by SierraJuliet »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Turn Sent.

I brought in five 49 Plane Tony-100 Sentai. They were told to SWEEP and kill enemy fighters...
This bunch of pilots are going to be tad upset when they learn that you have sent them into the hornets nest at the same time as picking up you marbles and going home! I have a feeling that they think the war is still there to be won. [:D]
Kido Butai, although powerful, was a raiding force, and this is exactly how the Japanese understood its usage. 'Shattered Sword'
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: March 1945

Post by JohnDillworth »

BTW, what are you shooting at Tex? Are you targeting the CV's , transports or capital ships?
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

BTW, what are you shooting at Tex? Are you targeting the CV's , transports or capital ships?

There is, as normal, about 10-12 STF defending the hex. NO crap on that. There will be 3-4 PT TF, then 3-4 DD TF, and then 3-4 CA/CL TF, and then some large fellas named Iowa and New Jersey. This is before you even get to tankers, APA, AK, etc...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: March 1945

Post by zuluhour »

I would think more wind. Something in the range of 350 special attack a/c. When I was in 1946 with Lars, and I'll check with him tonight, he was prepared to deliver much larger strikes, and if memory serves me right from Greyjoy, you will overwhelm the A2A model as well as the CAP and deliver serious blows. Of course LRCAP and or escort and sweeps at various altitudes can't hurt.
just 2 cent

**another thought..... have you tried some night strikes? When I had large CVE TFs off Okinawa in 45-46 it was my biggest fear as I had neglected
night fighter deployment
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: March 1945

Post by JohnDillworth »

There is, as normal, about 10-12 STF defending the hex. NO crap on that. There will be 3-4 PT TF, then 3-4 DD TF, and then 3-4 CA/CL TF, and then some large fellas named Iowa and New Jersey. This is before you even get to tankers, APA, AK, etc...

I presume that aircraft will ignore PT boats and then randomly select among the other ships. Wiser players would know better if there is any preference. I'd heard that transports and CVE's were more likely targeted.
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: March 1945

Post by JohnDillworth »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

I would think more wind. Something in the range of 350 special attack a/c. When I was in 1946 with Lars, and I'll check with him tonight, he was prepared to deliver much larger strikes, and if memory serves me right from Greyjoy, you will overwhelm the A2A model as well as the CAP and deliver serious blows. Of course LRCAP and or escort and sweeps at various altitudes can't hurt.
just 2 cent

**another thought..... have you tried some night strikes? When I had large CVE TFs off Okinawa in 45-46 it was my biggest fear as I had neglected
night fighter deployment

Greyjoy
ALL RISE! [&o][&o][&o]
anybody ever hear from that guy?
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: March 1945

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
Anybody else have anything to add?

I think this muted test confirmed your pre-conceived notions about the role of kamikazes, John. I lose track of how many times posters (myself included) have called for a mass attack with LBA, Carrier-based, kamikazes and surface forces simultaneously. Feeding small (and yes 250 kamikazes is small) units into the meat grinder solo and then expressing shock about their demise will not yield revolutionary thinking about a balanced attack or the role that kamikazes could have / should have played to this point.
Image
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: March 1945

Post by ny59giants »

I agree with Chicken-san. Throw in the kitchen sink, two young male children, and a slightly used Union Pacific caboose into this attack. [:D] Vary your altitude, but try to have airframes with similar cruise speed go into together from the same AF to help get larger strikes in.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

I only had about 50% fly last turn due to weather. The attack should have been about 7-800 Fighters and 3-400 Attack Planes. Add another 250 Fighters, as detailed above, set for sweeps. We'll see the results this turn...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

March 16, 1945

With school back in session I have a better opportunity to do real Reviews of the day-to-day action. Will cover March 16th and then, with later Posts, hit the major areas of action.

KOREA
Gunzan
Hardly anything flies this day. Weather was pretty bad so we'll run with that. There were two Sweeps by 34 and 18 Tony Fighters flying at 30,000 Ft. They encounter 310 Fighters. The planes do pretty well--all things being equal--and win a 3:2 exchange in the air: 20 for roughly 30. Three anemic raids go in with 11 F 5 B (no survivors), 25 F 11 DB (no survivors), and 31 F 6 TB. Surprisingly all 6 Frances get thru and SINK APA Pres. Monroe with three hits. NICE!

To get Dan to pull back troops, I ordered a brand new ID to advance on Gunzan from the South. It has caused Dan to pull troops from Taiyku and the hex between Gunzan and Keijo. He'll bombard it tomorrow and probably hit it with 200 B-24 but it has already served its purpose to distract him.

Taiyku
My opponent has pulled all but an ID and a Brigade from this base. Those units face three full strength Japanese ID and 9 AA units plus two Eng Reg. We will attack tomorrow and see if there is any chance in this hex.

Keijo
The ground between Gunzan and Keijo has 8-10 units in it. I move (very slowly) two weak Artillery units towards and into the hex--once again--to 'fix' Dan in place while I try to take Taiyku.

Moppo
Been using this as an air base and station for my Midget SS and PT Boats. The Brits pay it a visit with 2 CL and 5 DDs, fight thru two TFs of ML and PT then bombard the AF for moderate damage. There is CD and about 350 mines present here.

Fast TF
I am allowed--AGAIN--to run my APDs (10 of them) back to Fusan while racing 5 of the 1,000 supply PG thru to get to Tiensin in NE China. This exchange is now running for the 3rd time and each time the two TFs bring in 10,000 supply to what was a very supply-starved region. It is looking way better now.

CHINA
Haichow
On the coast I have been using 50 Transport planes to bring in enough supply for the defenders to crush the single Chinese Corps here. Scored a 10-1 assault today and am position to make this Corps surrender fairly soon if nothing changes.

88,45 (SE Kaifeng)
Two Japanese ID and a Brigade crush a Chinese Corps with a 20-1 assault. The Chinese are hit by nearly 50 bombers during the day and then lose 3,448 troops and 14 guns. I lose 322.

This whole area around Kaifeng, the base NW of it, and Nanyang (to the SW) has seen a growing Japanese Offensive that has trashed at least four Chinese Corps and is set to take out at least 2-3 more.

Tsinan
This is a the big banana for the China Offensive.

Dan has sent the vast majority of his troops SE to take Tsingtao. That base, delightfully, continues to hold by a shoestring and keeps his 5+ ID occupied while the 3rd Tank Div holds the road between Tsinan and Tsingtao. Yesterday saw the arrival of five Japanese IDs with 4 AA units and two Eng Reg. We shall attack tomorrow and am pretty sure we only face the 9th (re-built) Aussie ID and two Inf-Tk units I crushed taking the hex just outside the city.

There is only a thin chance of taking the base but I wanted to try and get lucky. We'll know after tomorrow's attack.

Malaya
A group of 7 Lily DB smack down a small TF trying to run supplies into Victoria Point. An AM and 3 LSM are sunk for no loss.

The enemy has just taken Singora and many troops will be trapped at Alor Star. We shall not allow them to be lost! A TF of Escorts and 20 AK/AKL depart Singers to evacuate most of the troops present. Plan to lift them off--under Fighter Cover--and then bring them back to Singers to refit before advancing north again. This delaying action in Malaya has been magnificent. It has taken him nearly six months to advance to this point for very little cost to the Japanese while keep the Northern/Central Sumatra oil facilities running full bore.

Java
Soerabaja
A total of 48 Tankers are fully loaded with two CVEs and enough escorts to make each a 25 ship TF. These ships carry 417,154 Fuel and 76,466 Oil. Time to move tomorrow towards Balikpapan. The TFs shall be escorted by 3 CV and 2 CVL as they, once again, head for the Home Isles.

West Coast
For the first time in a year, a group of six long-range I-Boats will deploy near the Los Angeles area to see how lazy my opponent is with escorts. Three of the six are uselessly huge I-400 class. Had the points and said 'why not?' so I built them for this mission. They'll probably sink without hitting anything! [:D]


Those are the events from around the map.

Image
Attachments
031645.jpg
031645.jpg (447.5 KiB) Viewed 380 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

Here is what we find at Genzan.

Should note that I was 100% on target. The great troop killers from the sky appear overhead and destroy the 150th ID. Doesn't matter. This sacrificial lamb was a distraction to occupy his attention for a few days. It entered the hex at 32% strength! The units was nailed by a total of 233 B-24 and 30 2EB...


Image
Attachments
031745a.jpg
031745a.jpg (600.92 KiB) Viewed 380 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

March 19, 1945

My 'little boys' have been doing occasional damage. Sent in two TF of MTB and 3 Midget SS to Gunzan. Lost all Midgets and 4 MTB but scored two TT his and numerous small arms hits. It is something.

The Allies have laid a crap-ton of mines in the base hex and two of the Midgets were lost to them.


Image
Attachments
031945.jpg
031945.jpg (487.66 KiB) Viewed 380 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5246
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: March 1945

Post by zuluhour »

surely, his glorious highness would acquiesce to placing a Shotai special attack unit on night attack for the amusement of cadets on Kure??
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

That is an outstanding idea. In the interests of 'the cadets at Kure' this will be done next turn...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Hortlund
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 8:00 am

RE: March 1945

Post by Hortlund »

There is something that I have been wondering while reading (both) your AARs.

Why did you not fight for the Phillipines? Why did you never seem to draw a red line somewhere and commit all your forces?
The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: March 1945

Post by John 3rd »

That battle was in Sumatra when Dan invaded it in 1943. The Campaign was a resounding success with the destruction of several hundred Allied ships, an immense number of airframes, and the destruction of nearly 150,000 troops. It was a magnificent VICTORY!

The impact from that victory was the gutting of the Japanese 'small boys' in the Fleet. I lost soooooooooo many DDs and CLs that the Fleet has never recovered.

Twice I planned to go 'all in' after that but was caught out of position both times. That was my mistake.

We're going to be hitting the 'campaign lessons' phase of the AAR sometime soon and one of the big ones for me is being able to pull the final trigger for the 'fight to the death.' I was reticent for waaaaaay too long to lose the Fleet. I LOVE my CVs and BIG Boys. Had a devil of a time wrapping my mind around sending them to their doom. Won't happen next campaign. Course I do have to say that my personal opinions around my noble opponent's strategy of using the ENTIRE Allied CV Fleet as nothing but Fighter cover for 1,000,000+ AK-AP-APA--etc..., therefore, making it unassailable is a hugely contributing factor to that choice.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”