Outsourcing recon

Gary Grigsby’s War in the West 1943-45 is the most ambitious and detailed computer wargame on the Western Front of World War II ever made. Starting with the Summer 1943 invasions of Sicily and Italy and proceeding through the invasions of France and the drive into Germany, War in the West brings you all the Allied campaigns in Western Europe and the capability to re-fight the Western Front according to your plan.

Moderators: Joel Billings, RedLancer

Post Reply
User avatar
coolts
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:47 am
Location: Auf Wiedersehen, Pet

Outsourcing recon

Post by coolts »

Is there any penalty to flying recon missions with the air commands that don't generally fly AD's like coastal or troop carrier? That could clear 3 AD's from each of my combat air commands. I read an AAR where the poster recommended this.
"Gauls! We have nothing to fear; except perhaps that the sky may fall on our heads tomorrow. But as we all know, tomorrow never comes!!" - Chief Vitalstatistix
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15788
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: Outsourcing recon

Post by Helpless »

No penalties.
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2/CS-2 Development
User avatar
RedLancer
Posts: 4338
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:09 am
Location: UK

RE: Outsourcing recon

Post by RedLancer »

Historically 106 Group RAF, responsible for strategic recon, was under command of Coastal Command so don't think it's too gamey.
John
WitE2 Asst Producer
WitE & WitW Dev
User avatar
apd1004
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:35 am

RE: Outsourcing recon

Post by apd1004 »


I believe the reason for the AAR recommendations to put recon in your transport commands is because you will never give those commands any other air directives since air/airborne transport missions are not assigned using air directives. That means the transport commands have free AD slots that would otherwise go unused.
ORIGINAL: Red Lancer

Historically 106 Group RAF, responsible for strategic recon, was under command of Coastal Command so don't think it's too gamey.

In the USAAF, the photo recon squadrons were assigned to Photographic Reconnaissance Groups, which were attached to the numbered air forces such as the Eighth Air Force, similar to the Bomb Groups and Fighter Groups. Since we don't have those group HQ's in the game (we could edit them into a custom game I suppose), I don't feel game guilt at all assigning them to one of the transport commands as an alternative. I think we can get along without the bomber & fighter group HQ's but the recon HQ's would definitely be useful for this purpose.

Personally I use the IX Troop Carrier Command in 1943 as the holder for my high level recon and RAF Transport for the low level up north, and XII Troop Carrier for high level and Coastal for low level in the Med. I wish there was a second troop carrier command in the Med because I do have a few naval interdiction AD's assigned to Coastal which limits the recon AD's I'd like to have.

apd1004
_______________
Jeff Leslie
Akron OH, USA
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the West”