Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

sanch
Posts: 423
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:55 am

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by sanch »

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ORIGINAL: ny59giants
Rabaul: 40-79-96, they repaired only 2 points of runway damage, the slackers! [:@]

Not really. If you look at all your LCUs, they are mostly highly disrupted (70s to 80s). They take one turn just to shake the cobwebs out (if not attacked again). On the second day, the disruption goes down to the 40s and you will get 'some' repairs done. By third day without attacks, their disruption is reduced again and they are basically fully functional.


Sounds normal, 2 working... 6 supervising

Image

Typical of the IJA - they don't send replacement parts out to the field. Instead they send a machine out to the field that they can use to MAKE parts. That there is an old-fashioned metal lathe (I've spent many hours working one of those beauties).
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10644
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

Well not really old-fashioned. I've got a very similar model in my shop right now ... Oh hold it ... I'm not that young and it was my Uncle's who got it from my grandfather. But it still works just fine. Keeps me in 63 F100 and 68 Mustang parts. :)
Pax
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16092
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Very nice skill to have. I worked in a machine shop summers and breaks during my first few years of college and got to a point where the shop chief would hand me a blueprint, tell me how many he wanted and turn me loose. Sadly that skill is long gone on me. It was almost 40 years ago. [:(] Wish I had a way to keep it up but as a college student I hardly had the means to keep a car let alone buy a lathe.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Lokasenna »

I spy 7 supervisors, with one of them being mostly out of frame...
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by MakeeLearn »

The soldier on the extreme left was on break.






Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

The soldier on the extreme left was on break.
He's there to supervise the supers.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16092
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

8 Jul 43

Sub War

Ted apparently found my FOB at Ambon. The Peto moved into that base and took a shot at a TK dropping off fuel, but luckily missed. She got away from the escorting PB.

The Rasher sank an xAKL off Truk. That damn sub has been reported sunk half a dozen times. [8|] As my mother-in-law would say, they (the intel weenies) are a piece of work. [:D]

Finally, the I-31 sank an xAK off Cold Bay, which was part of an empty convoy heading back to the US west coast after dropping off supply at Dutch Harbor. That’s the third cargo ship of that convoy hit. Two were sunk enroute to Dutch Harbor a few days ago.

5 Fleet
4 Fleet


Nothing to report.

SE Fleet

Rabaul’s port was the main target today. Over 200 bombing sorties didn’t do much at all really.

Current damage:

Rabaul: 44-79-90, port damage up only 4(!) and runway down 6.
Kavieng: 78-88-7, runway down 9.
Manus: 92-100-54, port up 1 and runway down 11.

Pretty soon it’ll be time to station some fighters at Kavieng to work over the bombers when they come back. I won’t do it until the service damage is <50.

I thought I was doing pretty well against his bombers. Obviously, that’s a pipe dream. I can’t cut down his numbers no matter how many fighters I have opposing them. That’s truly amazing. I cheer when I get a new air unit. They’re pretty few and far between for the most part. I have no model getting more than 4 replacement airframes a day. Sheesh.

SRA

Yesterday, I noticed that one of the carrier TFs (not sure whether CV or CVE) stopped off in Pt. Moresby. I figured it was to replenish but thought it might be headed toward Merauke. Turns out I was right. That carrier group is passing Horn Island. I have a sub there keeping an eye on it as well as naval search from Hollandia and some Betties stationed in the SRA.

I have 36 Betties in the area but only a dozen Tojos. I moved a 31 plane G3M3 Nell daitai there from Little Andaman Island. All the Betties and Nells are on night naval attack. Let’s see if some of them fly. In addition, I have that elite Tojo sentai moving toward the area. I’d love for them to tangle with some Hellcats and put those carrier fighters in their place.

It actually turned out to be a nice move on my part. First, and most important, it got Ted reacting to me for a change. I assume the carrier TF is the CV TF. (I’m hoping that is the case). It pulls a major asset away from his current focus, Rabaul. Sure he has 200+ bombers still there, but they can’t take ground. Without carrier support, I can chew up invasion forces pretty easily. Well, at least until they land. It gives me carrier superiority in the SE Fleet AO. It also gives me a reason to go on the offensive. Here’s what I did this turn:

KB1 (Akagi, Kaga, Ryujo and Hosho) is steaming west from Truk to support MKB (Ryuho, Unyo, Taiyo, Chuyo) should the US carriers get ambitious. Between them, they have 123 fighters, 99 Judies/Vals and 90 Kates. In addition to that there are 12 land based fighters and 67 Nells/Betties with another 42 elite Tojos enroute. I’m hoping to set up a trap to whittle down the carrier planes (and maybe a carrier or two). I’ll settle for damage to force the carriers to withdraw. I’m moving subs in position to pick off the odd damaged ship or two. It is a potential danger for those subs since it's all shallow hexes, but isn't that what they get paid for? [:D]

KB2 (Shokaku, Zuikaku and Soryu), composed of 98 Zeros (including 26 A6M5c), 54 Judies and 54 Kates is heading SE from Truk to see if they can surprise some Allied shipping around the Solomons. The second US carrier TF was last spotted at Milne Bay (yesterday). I think it is the CVE TF. If they spot my carriers, they’ll run. If I can’t find any suitable targets, I may have some of the fighters fly LRCAP over Rabaul for a couple of days to whittle down the bombers a bit. At any rate, it’s all about delaying the Allied monster. Death of a thousand cuts would be nice too.

Once Rabaul’s airfield is back in business, I can fly in a bunch of rested fighters to work on the bombers once again.

Burma

Five more Allied fighters are shot down. Another elite pilot to add to TRACOM. I keep 6 elite pilots with this sentai and ship the rest to TRACOM to work over the flying monkeys and try to accelerate a few.

China

Nothing to report.

Other Stuff

I noticed something very interesting today. Every day, I check my aircraft R&D. I look for repairing factories as well as % gain for plane types. I accidentally moused over the five Sam factories and noticed it is at 7%! I have no clue how that happened because the factories are currently at 3(27), 3(27), 2(28), 1(29) and 1(29). Anyone have an idea how that happened? I didn’t think R&D could advance if there wasn’t a fully repaired factory. Apparently it can!


Image
Attachments
RnD.jpg
RnD.jpg (323.26 KiB) Viewed 246 times
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9891
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by ny59giants »

I thought I was doing pretty well against his bombers. Obviously, that’s a pipe dream. I can’t cut down his numbers no matter how many fighters I have opposing them. That’s truly amazing. I cheer when I get a new air unit. They’re pretty few and far between for the most part. I have no model getting more than 4 replacement airframes a day. Sheesh.

Fire your economics minister!! [:D]
[center]Image[/center]
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Zorch »

How is your average pilot quality holding up? Is attrition getting to your aces?
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

I'll start with one carrier per division with the M5c and go from there.

I'd do that or the CVL's, wouldn't go further 'til the results are in. Then again you could always go back. That is as long as your CV's are still around.[:'(]
You're right about the load on the Emily. I keep going back and forth between range and load. Thanks for making me unsure....again.

No problem.[:D]
I have no model getting more than 4 replacement airframes a day. Sheesh.

Seems a bit short, but if its working for ya.... Hey, no need having bunches of 1st or 2nd gen A/C that'll have no function (other than kami) when you start getting late war planes.
I accidentally moused over the five Sam factories and noticed it is at 7%! I have no clue how that happened because the factories are currently at 3(27), 3(27), 2(28), 1(29) and 1(29). Anyone have an idea how that happened? I didn’t think R&D could advance if there wasn’t a fully repaired factory. Apparently it can!

AFAIK that can't happen. The only thing I can suggest is you had early repairs to a small R&D factories. IOW you had several 1(1) factories that remained that way for a month or so and then you expanded them to 30, they would then be 1(30). I've had it happen once or twice, but not to a level of seven.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

Rex - Why not?? These are the FF version of the George.

One other thing that I just remembered, as I wanted to check on this first. The George was derived from the Rex, not the other way around.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16092
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi
I accidentally moused over the five Sam factories and noticed it is at 7%! I have no clue how that happened because the factories are currently at 3(27), 3(27), 2(28), 1(29) and 1(29). Anyone have an idea how that happened? I didn’t think R&D could advance if there wasn’t a fully repaired factory. Apparently it can!

AFAIK that can't happen. The only thing I can suggest is you had early repairs to a small R&D factories. IOW you had several 1(1) factories that remained that way for a month or so and then you expanded them to 30, they would then be 1(30). I've had it happen once or twice, but not to a level of seven.

I can't figure it out either, Rusty. But it's right there in the picture. I have all my turns for the entire game (yeah, I'm crazy) so I'm going to go back and sample to see what's up. Also note that until maybe a month ago, I was researching the A7M3, not the A7M2. I'll let you know what I find out.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

Yeah, the 7% isn't that big a deal, who knows what happened. Why I'm really posting here is that it dawned on me last night that you were still researching the A6M8. If you don't like the range on the M5c, the M8 is even less at four for normal range. I can see they're all fully repaired, but it'll still take you quite a while to get the thing operational, and that's with the engine bonus. Do you think it would be better to switch them to say the Sam and get it cranking once everything is repaired? Just a thought. Maybe some others can chime in here with some ideas.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16092
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

9 Jul 43

Sub War

Too much excitement today. First, the Scamp (I thought I damaged her – damn FOW) torpedoed the xAK Tokusima Maru. She survived (so far) and is heading to Soerabaja for repairs. I'm a bit concerned because she has 13 fires remaining.

Ambon was the sub hotbed today. There are two Allied subs in the hex (at least). First, the Runner was caught by Nowaki and hit by a DC. Then, the Peto put a torpedo into the CVE Taiyo and then was prosecuted and hit with 2 DCs by her screen. Taiyo is now disbanded in port with 3-25(25)-14(11)-0 damage. She’ll eventually finish temporary repairs and head to Soerabaja or Singapore for complete repairs. During the turn, I saw 2 Allied subs still sitting in the port hex.

Note: I got the turn from Ted (haven't run it yet). We were jawing back and forth today during work. Apparently Peto has 75 flot damage and is headed home (wherever that is).

Ted commented that his subs are the only thing that can actually hit my carriers. Now that I think about it, he’s right.

Something hit a mine. Not sure where but it may have been the S-28.

5 Fleet
4 Fleet


Nothing to report.

SE Fleet

The Great Bomber Horde hit Rabaul’s airfield, Kavieng’s airfield and Manus’ port, increasing damage to all of them:

Rabaul: 44-94-98
Kavieng: 78-91-39
Manus: 98-100-49

Gotta figure something out here. These bases are beat up to a point where he can maintain it unless I can get fighter cover over them. Gasmata and another base just to the west of Rabaul are undamaged but have little supply to sustain fighters for very long. Gasmata probably won’t get anything other than the transports that are dropping a little supply (from Truk) but that other base may get some supply from fast transport TFs. That base is within range of SBDs, Avengers and Beauforts, but I think there’s enough supply there to support a fighter unit to protect the TF as it dumps off supply. We’ll see. I’ll set that up tomorrow and fly the fighters in at the last minute so it possibly slips below Ted’s radar.

SRA

The Taiyo will survive, but MKB and the surface fleet are now stuck at Ambon. I have about 4 ASW TFs prosecuting the area for subs. Hopefully, both of the subs took enough damage that they will leave, but I expect that not to be the case. I moved the 27 Vals off Taiyo to the airbase at Ambon. The pilots are naval attack and ASW trained so they’re set to ASW to cover Ambon and the surrounding 6 hexes. I may move in an ASW trained Sally sentai too (from the Palembang area which is quiet again now) if I have enough AS to support them. Have to check.

About the US carriers that were near Horn Island yesterday? They just vanished. (Note: Ted admitted they were his big boys.) I’m pretty sure they retired to the east because I have subs to the west and substantial naval search covering the area. They could still be around, but I doubt it.

I have 27 IJA transports at Soerabaja that I will move to Ambon tomorrow. I'll use them to drop an IJA para regiment on Timoeka eventually to try and take out the 4 Marine Raider Battalion there. I want it to coincide with a naval bombardment with my BBs. Gotta clear those pesky subs out of Ambon first…..and confirm the US CVs aren’t in the area. I originally wanted to do a naval invasion but am reconsidering. The Raiders are good, but I’ll bet there are no engineers there, so no forts. A couple bombardments, first with 4 BBs then with 4 CAs should put a hurting on them.

Note: Ted said he sent his carriers toward Merauke to prevent further raids in the area.

Burma
China


Nothing to report.

Other Stuff

It looks like the Ki-100-II Tony is 3 days out. In 1 day, I’ll shift 2x30 factories to the A7M2 and 1x30 to the Ki-84a Frank. The remaining 3x30 will become operational and probably increase to 60 each.

Rusty, I’m going to make a decision on the A6M8 in the next couple of days. Your argument is compelling. There are 4x30 R&D factories on it and it will advance to 7/45 in 3 days. When it advances, I’ll either keep going or change all of them to the A7M2. I currently can’t see the stats and need to look at them. Should I decide to change it, I’ll increase the A7M2 R&D factories from 5 to 11 in the next few days (5 currently + 2 from the Tony + 4 from the A6M8).

I’ve got a nice group of carriers coming soon. The CVLs Chitose and Chiyoda are coming in a little less than 2 months, early September. About a week or so later, I’ll get 3 CVs, the 63 capacity ones. Then in early October, I get 2 more CVL conversions (Mizuho and Nisshin). That’s over 300 additional capacity by mid-October!
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9891
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by ny59giants »

The Great Bomber Horde hit Rabaul’s airfield, Kavieng’s airfield and Manus’ port, increasing damage to all of them:

Rabaul: 44-94-98
Kavieng: 78-91-39
Manus: 98-100-49

Gotta figure something out here. These bases are beat up to a point where he can maintain it unless I can get fighter cover over them. Gasmata and another base just to the west of Rabaul are undamaged but have little supply to sustain fighters for very long. Gasmata probably won’t get anything other than the transports that are dropping a little supply (from Truk) but that other base may get some supply from fast transport TFs. That base is within range of SBDs, Avengers and Beauforts, but I think there’s enough supply there to support a fighter unit to protect the TF as it dumps off supply. We’ll see. I’ll set that up tomorrow and fly the fighters in at the last minute so it possibly slips below Ted’s radar.

So ship in about 100 heavy AA guns. I would go with Manus first. They don't cost too much to rebuild, if you have to.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16092
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Ooh, good idea. Rabaul has a bunch but that's about it.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16092
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

10 Jul 43

Sub War

Another of my tankers probably bites the dust. In the deep water pass south of Tarakan, the Greenling put a torpedo into the TK Ogura Maru #3. She was empty and she didn’t go down, but she probably will. I need to dedicate an ASW TF to that hex with ships that have good (better than Type 95 and preferably Type 2) depth charges. Her current damage is 30-55(34)-26(17)-17. It all depends on the fire. She’s currently limping along to Tarakan, 4 days out.

The I-17 caught a convoy ~10 hexes SW of Astoria, probably full, and put a torpedo into the xAK Barossa. She didn’t go down either but later in the day, the I-17 put another torpedo into her and down she went.

5 Fleet
4 Fleet


Nothing to report.

SE Fleet

First, the mundane. A total of 170 bomber sorties hit Rabaul’s airfield causing light damage. To be honest, the airfield there is trashed so there wasn’t much more they could do.

Manus got hit by 31x 2E bombers causing a bit of additional runway damage and Tulagi was visited by 10x 4E bombers. I’m not sure what they really were after because they missed.

Ok, KB2, with Soryu, Shokaku and Zuikaku, got within range of Buka and launched a couple of attacks against the shipping there. The first, with 9 Kates escorted by 14 Zeros, put 4 torpedoes into the LSI(L) Westralia sinking her outright. She was a biggun, but empty, which I figured.

The second attack of 18 Kates escorted by 28 Zeros found the APA Dheridan and AKA Libra and put 3 and 2 torpedoes into them respectively. Neither was reported to have sunk but I’ll bet they’re not too happy. It’s interesting to note that both attacks came from Soryu’s TB complement and that Shokaku and Zuikaku didn’t launch any TBs at all.

I’m curious as to why none of the DBs flew. They were 7 hexes out and 27 of 54 Kates flew but none of the 54 Judies flew. A couple of 500kg bombs would have sealed their fate. By the way, one Kate was lost to flak. Not a bad trade rate.

I’ll assume the two ships survive, so I’m going to try and get some subs to the west to try and intercept them when they crawl to safety. I haven’t been putting subs in that area because it’s become so dangerous. One RO sub is just a few hexes away and can get into position. We’ll see what happens. Right now the airfield there is level 1. There are some fighters and bombers at the airbase. I chickened out and moved my carriers a bit north. It didn’t dawn on me that the bombers wouldn’t fly until the airfield reached level 2. I should have stayed there and took them on again. He’s probably going to run with his ships, but they may be badly damaged and unable to move very fast. We’ll see what happens.

So 9 of 27 torpedoes hit, a 33% rate. That was pretty good compared to the past. Hope this is tidings of things to come. I suspect the Allied ships were parked there. It’s a lot easier to hit a stationary target.

SRA

Nothing much happened here. A handful of Nells bombed the Raiders at Timoeka. His CVs have pulled back and were spotted 2 hexes east of Horn Island. KB1 (Akagi, Kaga, Ryujo and Hosho) is still rounding the tip of PNG to team up with MKB1 to support an attack on Timoeka. They’ll be on the north side of PNG tomorrow only 3 hexes from Timoeka. The plan is to bombard it into the stone-age with BBs then CAs and drop a para regment on it. The combined carriers will surge forward a bit to sweep Merauke and kill off the Allied fighters there then bomb the airfield to kill off any PBYs there. That’s the plan, anyway.

Timoeka made a level 2 airfield today. That’s curious because it was a dot base yesterday. A gazillion Seabees? In my daily bombing raid, I keep seeing only the 4 Marine Raider Battalion.

Right now I have a 3 CA TF four hexes west of there. I’m sending them in to visit tomorrow. Hopefully, they’ll trash that brand spanking new airfield. I expect enemy fighters there shortly.

It turns out I had a chutai of transports at Ambon that I had forgotten about. I moved the transports from Soerabaja there so now I have 36 available to move my para regiment.

Burma

Nothing to report.

China

Two more Chinese units wandering around the countryside were killed off today.

Other Stuff

Reinforcements:
RO-110 – Off to Truk for use in SE Fleet area.
xAK Hoten Maru – Std-A, will convert to a TK.

The G4M2a Betty R&D advanced to 5/44 (will become operational around 12/43 or so). There is one repaired factory with another at 13(17).

The Ki-100-II Tony is at 92% to reach Jul 43. I moved 1 factory to the Ki-84a Frank and 2 to the A7M2 Sam leaving 3 on the Tony that will become operational in 2 days. I now have 7 Sam factories and 9 Frank factories. Three of the Frank factories will become operational and the other six will research the Ki-84r. I anticipate the Ki-84r to become operational around 12/20/43. I have no estimate on the Sam.

I have decided to give up on the A6M8 R&D. Those 4 factories will change to the A7M2 R&D when the A6M8 advances to 7/45 in 2 or 3 days. That’ll bring me up to 11x A7M2 factories.

The sub reinforcement frees up another 24 naval points. I’m pretty sure that now I can accelerate 2 of the 3 CVs every day. I hope the three CVs will become available mid-September 43. They will be a TF unto themselves with 189 aircraft (81 fighters, 54 dive bombers, 27 torpedo bombers).
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16092
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

11 Jul 43

Sub War

Despite the couple hundred Allied bomber sorties, it was a pretty good turn today. It all started with the Ikazuchi driving the Gurnard to the surface at Ambon and sinking her, I think. If not, she'd definitely hurting after having been hit 3 times with depth charges and multiple times with the DDs full arsenal.

5 Fleet
4 Fleet


Nothing to report.

SE Fleet

I had detached the Kongo and Haruna from KB2 to make a dash for Buna and shoot the place up and (hopefully) shoot up some of the planes there. It worked out pretty well. They caused a fair amount of airfield damage and destroyed 3 each Wildcats and Dauntlesses while damaging 9 and 11 more respectively. It was so successful that I'm sending them back in to try it again and (again hopefully) destroy some of those damaged planes.

I also noticed there are ships in port at Buna, 3 to be exact. I'm moving KB2 to a point 5 hexes from Buna and am launching full loads of planes on port attack at Buna (secondary, after naval attack) to take out the APA and AKA (and LSI(L) if she is still around).

I moved 24 fighters to Talasea with 6 on CAP and the remainder on LRCAP of Rabaul. My hope was to shoot down a few bombers. It worked. He sent 14 fighter sorties (2 sweeps before the bombers came) and 177 bomber sorties escorted by another 20 fighters against my 54 fighters. Let's see, 20 fighters on LRCAP but 54 fighters present. I forgot that I set most of KB2s fighters on LRCAP too and a lot of them showed up for the fun. When it was all said and done, I lost 5 Zeros shot down, mainly from the carriers, but only 2 carrier KIA and 1 carrier WIA. Overall, I lost 13 carrier Zeros, mainly op losses and written off. The Allies lost 15 fighters and 10 bombers. Not bad at all. It's interesting to note that Rabaul's damage remained the same. The airfield was already trashed so there was nothing more to damage.

Manus took more airfield damage from 60 bomber sorties.

Here's the current damage:

Manus: 94-100-95
Kavieng: 78-91-30
Rabaul: 44-100-99

I expect Ted to go after Talasea tomorrow. I pulled all the fighters out except a few that are damaged. That's ok. It'll give the other airfields a chance to repair a bit.

SRA

The 3 CA bombardment TF hit Timoeka causing significant damage to the airfield and port. It was a nice bombardment.

I still can't replenish my BB main gun ammo (poor planning). I have 2x AKEs that will arrive tomorrow. Maybe that will do it, but I am also shipping a naval HQ there to be sure. I'm confident the CAs will be able to replenish, but we'll see about the BBs.

For the first time in a while, I don't see any enemy subs in or around Ambon. The two that were there are either sunk or badly damaged and attempting to limp to a friendly port.

KB2 will reach a point 3 hexes from Timoeka tomorrow. I can't recall if I gave them any attack orders (it was pretty late and I was pretty tired). It'll be a surprise for all of us! [:D]

Burma
China


Nothing to report.

Other Stuff

The Ki-84a R&D advanced to 11/43 (will become operational in 8/43).

The Ki-100-II Tony became operational. 3x30 factories became operational, 2x30 converted to the A7M2 R&D and 1x30 converted to the Ki-84a R&D. So, the production is 90 per month and I increased one factory to 60. Let's see what they can do!
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

You're right about the load on the Emily. I keep going back and forth between range and load. Thanks for making me unsure....again.

Maybe this will help you decide. In my AI game I'm running short of Mavis'. I really didn't want to produce the first Emily as it won't carry radar, but I have no choice if I wish to keep these patrol units fully supplied with A/C (I converted production to Emily's when they became available). Now all that said I noticed the Emily patrol version has a load capacity of 4400 and a normal range of 25. That's more capacity and range than the transport version of the Mavis. Since both types can perform essentially the same missions maybe its time for you to retire the Mavis-L in favor of the Emily-L, and let the patrol Emily's take over the duties you had in mind for the Emily-L.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by mind_messing »

Would it be possible for to get a picture of the strategic situation with SE Fleet?

ORIGINAL: ny59giants
The Great Bomber Horde hit Rabaul’s airfield, Kavieng’s airfield and Manus’ port, increasing damage to all of them:

Rabaul: 44-94-98
Kavieng: 78-91-39
Manus: 98-100-49

Gotta figure something out here. These bases are beat up to a point where he can maintain it unless I can get fighter cover over them. Gasmata and another base just to the west of Rabaul are undamaged but have little supply to sustain fighters for very long. Gasmata probably won’t get anything other than the transports that are dropping a little supply (from Truk) but that other base may get some supply from fast transport TFs. That base is within range of SBDs, Avengers and Beauforts, but I think there’s enough supply there to support a fighter unit to protect the TF as it dumps off supply. We’ll see. I’ll set that up tomorrow and fly the fighters in at the last minute so it possibly slips below Ted’s radar.

So ship in about 100 heavy AA guns. I would go with Manus first. They don't cost too much to rebuild, if you have to.

I'd advise against this. Not because it's a bad idea, it makes perfect sense, but because it will burn supply like crazy on an island in a remote theater.

100 AA guns will burn more supply than the Allies will ever bomb. The airbase supply dumps make take 1 hit in a raid, or 10, and supply loss will vary. With 100 AA guns, the supply will be eaten up every raid, irrespective of damage caused.

To that end, my advice is keep your AA guns centralized around the major supply centers in the DEI and Home Islands. Out in the wilderness they're a liability, but they're an invaluable asset in the industrial heartland.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”