Islands of Destiny: RA 5.0 Japanese Side

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1945

Post by John 3rd »

April 16, 1945

Busy turn as Dan takes Antung, Korea and Kluong, Malaya.

The ground action doesn't go all the Allies way as a host of Japanese Infantry units CRUSH the 23rd Indian Division at 91,42 getting a 342-1 result yielding 3,906 Cas, 71 Guns, and 67 V. OUCH.

In the air Dan hits Sapporo with -29s and does moderate damage.

Over Shimonoseki B-29 and B-24 appear without any Fighter Sweeps. They are met by 74 angry Japanese Fighters who chew them up. NICE!

The CA TF moves into the Yellow Sea and Dan's target fixation works quite well. ALL his strike aircraft flew at various ground targets and nothing flew shipping missions. My TF sat in the middle of the Yellow Sea without being touched. The TF splits in two and lunges at a pair of targets. We'll hope for success in at least one direction. Three Fighter units are assigned to aircover tomorrow.


Image
Attachments
041645.jpg
041645.jpg (386.16 KiB) Viewed 319 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1945

Post by John 3rd »

VP SCORE

April 16, 1945

Japan 77,124 +581
Allies 144,294 +1,196




Image
Attachments
041645a.jpg
041645a.jpg (256.08 KiB) Viewed 319 times
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1945

Post by John 3rd »

The war goes on hold as I travel to Manhattan, KS Thurs--Monday. No turns but I will Post from time-to-time.
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
adarbrauner
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: April 1945

Post by adarbrauner »

You get very good results in the air during his bombardment runs, consistently.

From what you say about the raid in Yellow Sea, that was an excessive dangerous mission from embarked air strike - or did you count on surprise factor while his air wings involved in ground strikes?

Where are you providing air cover from???

And what the degress route shall be? Aren't you afraid to be met by killer splinters of main carrier fleet (maybe an occasion for an ambush from your side)?
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: April 1945

Post by ny59giants »

Can we get an update supply level screen shot? Hit the "B" button and sort by supplies please. I would like to see where you have the most supplies at.

Call you today while I visit my families.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: April 1945

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

VP SCORE

April 16, 1945

Japan 77,124 +581
Allies 144,294 +1,196






He's lost 1,435 B-24Js and upwards of 600 B-29s? Appalling.
Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: April 1945

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy



He's lost 1,435 B-24Js and upwards of 600 B-29s? Appalling.

Of more interest to me is the Frank losses. This game has been a great example of expending Franks in attritional warfare against the Allies. I think there are 3000+ Frank A losses to add to the 3,000 Frank B losses pictured here.

with respect to your earlier idea about expanding bases, I doubt this has much practical application, but making sure that those far flung Japanese outpost bases (and Manchuko) have supply to maintain full VP allowance would be a better bet. However, if there is local supply and engineers present, building bases to gain VP is a solid strategy. I just think the supply must be a limiting factor on this strategy.

User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: April 1945

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: John 3rd

VP SCORE

April 16, 1945

Japan 77,124 +581
Allies 144,294 +1,196






He's lost 1,435 B-24Js and upwards of 600 B-29s? Appalling.

Yes, I think Dan has just done the math and is willing to take the losses in view of the VP haul he is getting out of his bombing campaign. He has little sympathy for his air crews as long as the job gets done...War is cruel.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
AcePylut
Posts: 1487
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:01 am

RE: April 1945

Post by AcePylut »

Pixeltruppen matter not, to the all-knowing all-seeing mouse-clicker!
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: April 1945

Post by jwolf »

Absolutely correct. Really, if Dan didn't mind -- too much -- the sacrifice of an entire army in Sumatra, then he won't lose a lot of sleep over the loss of bombers and their crews, if in the process they are getting done what he wants them to.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: April 1945

Post by Chickenboy »

Oh, I know. I'm just saying that-in my opinion-I find this point of view appalling. Your / his mileage may vary. [8D]
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: April 1945

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I just think the supply must be a limiting factor on this strategy.

Unless it isn't a limiting factor on this gotterdammerung. Then it's a reasonable way to go for producing a few extra VPs.
Image
adarbrauner
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:40 am
Location: Zichron Yaaqov, Israel; Before, Treviso, Italy

RE: April 1945

Post by adarbrauner »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy



He's lost 1,435 B-24Js and upwards of 600 B-29s? Appalling.

Of more interest to me is the Frank losses. This game has been a great example of expending Franks in attritional warfare against the Allies. I think there are 3000+ Frank A losses to add to the 3,000 Frank B losses pictured here.

with respect to your earlier idea about expanding bases, I doubt this has much practical application, but making sure that those far flung Japanese outpost bases (and Manchuko) have supply to maintain full VP allowance would be a better bet. However, if there is local supply and engineers present, building bases to gain VP is a solid strategy. I just think the supply must be a limiting factor on this strategy.




I'd like just to point you out that in last months air war has been in greater part defensive for Japan and over own controlled territory, thus I'de be much interested in having a look at the allied pilot pools, and relative skills, to see what CR is now throwing against John III in this respect...

a possible ray of light and hope for Japan.
palioboy2
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:15 pm
Location: Canada

RE: April 1945

Post by palioboy2 »

The 8th air force lost over 4000 heavies in their bombing campaign over Germany and that ignores 15th AF loses also all the tactical air forces . The airwar in this campaign is much more comparable to the airwar over Europe then the IRL airwar over Japan. Dan really wasn't able to hurt Johns air force in any meaningful way before his bombers were over the home islands. I think his loses are quite reasonable considering the situation and the effectiveness of Japanese fighters.
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1945

Post by John 3rd »

Home from my weekend with Mom. Appreciate the commentary while I was gone.

Sent the April 17, 1945 turn just a few minutes ago so the depression my commence again.

VP April 17, 1945
Japan 77,136 +12
Allied 144,833 +539


Dan doesn't care about his aircraft losses. As was said above, he lost an entire field army in Sumatra and another in Celebes. A few hundred planes don't make a difference whatsoever.

Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: April 1945

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Home from my weekend with Mom. Appreciate the commentary while I was gone.

Sent the April 17, 1945 turn just a few minutes ago so the depression my commence again.

VP April 17, 1945
Japan 77,136 +12
Allied 144,833 +539


Dan doesn't care about his aircraft losses. As was said above, he lost an entire field army in Sumatra and another in Celebes. A few hundred planes don't make a difference whatsoever.


I am sure he cares, he is trying to use them responsibly, but they are a means to an end. I suspect you care about your 6000 Frank losses, but you still use them whenever you think you have an advantage or are forced to.


palioboy2
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:15 pm
Location: Canada

RE: April 1945

Post by palioboy2 »

Exactly can't make an omelette without scrambling eggs. It's not like Dan has been sending them on a long series of Schweinfurt raids. It has just been a brawl to the death in the skies over Japan, it was bound to happen with the huge air force John could put in the skies over the HI. Not to mention basically all the flak the Empire could muster even at the expense of his troops in the field.
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: April 1945

Post by JohnDillworth »

Dan doesn't care about his aircraft losses. As was said above, he lost an entire field army in Sumatra and another in Celebes. A few hundred planes don't make a difference whatsoever.
I don't think it is just aircraft. I think the bombing and squad loses are whats running up the points. You might be able to replace destroyed squads, but the points still count
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17785
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: April 1945

Post by John 3rd »

What I need is a victory without a lot of cost on points for the Allies. Am WORKING on that...
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: April 1945

Post by MakeeLearn »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

What I need is a victory without a lot of cost on points for the Allies. Am WORKING on that...


OR.... make his victories VERY expensive.






Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”