Ukishima Maru and Naminoue Maru art files / stats

[LargeSlowTarget]

Both stock and DBB have it wrong with those two ships, in those scenarios the two ships belong to the "Shanghai Maru" class, do 21 knots and have art portraying a ship with two funnels. This is all wrong.

The two ships should be distinct classes, do 17 knots max - since 16.5kn isn't modable - and have correct art.

Ukishima Maru should actually be an AMC instead of an AP.

See http://www.combinedfleet.com/UkishimaM_c.htm

I have "made" some art files that may serve the purpose - pic stolen from the net and modified to fit the purpose.

[LargeSlowTarget]

Zip file with the side and shil in .bmp format

[RichardAckermann]

Thanks! Looking nice.

[btd64]

Thank you LST....GP

[Kull]

That's great! Love the rainbow effect.

[John 3rd]

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

Both stock and DBB have it wrong with those two ships, in those scenarios the two ships belong to the "Shanghai Maru" class, do 21 knots and have art portraying a ship with two funnels. This is all wrong.

The two ships should be distinct classes, do 17 knots max - since 16.5kn isn't modable - and have correct art.

Ukishima Maru should actually be an AMC instead of an AP.

See http://www.combinedfleet.com/UkishimaM_c.htm

I have "made" some art files that may serve the purpose - pic stolen from the net and modified to fit the purpose.

The link provides armament. What do you think for range, troops and cargo?

[LargeSlowTarget]

ORIGINAL: John 3rd
The link provides armament. What do you think for range, troops and cargo?

Frankly, I have idea, so I looked for ships of comparable size.

Closest match displacement-wise seems to be the Bangkok Maru AMC and the Kongo Maru AP, so I use some variation of their stats.

I keep the endurance on the low side (i.e. closer to Kongo Maru AP than Bangkok Maru AMC) since in pre-war civilian life, Ukishima Maru was used on the Osaka - Okinawa run, so seems to have been build for short-range ops.

[John 3rd]

That helps. Thanks LST!