spots are in this image. It's going to get rougher in this area during the winter
I have a feeling.

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
Here's the adjacent section to the south of the previous image. Some of my weak
spots are in this image. It's going to get rougher in this area during the winter
I have a feeling.
![]()
That sounds like a great idea...I'll get busy and do it. Glad you like the publicationORIGINAL: AppendixSELove your AAR'sORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
Here's the adjacent section to the south of the previous image. Some of my weak
spots are in this image. It's going to get rougher in this area during the winter
I have a feeling.
![]()
I would try and shorten the lines up there. Anchor a line of defence between the lakes.
Ilmen is a good anchor with the rails closeby.Then you can have a small reserve and a
continuous line. Otherwise you will burn unit cohesionif retreating when the offensive
starts.
They will never make it. The Soviet PO destroys they Axis PO all by themselves if you let a game play out. The Axis need more units, would have to break all the divisions into regiments and beef them up to make a fair fight. The Axis PO probably needs more than the 5 objective tracks available in order to program them correctly with this size of a map. I have been thinking of a way to do it but it takes a lot of reworking and it would have to be a totally separate scenario from this one because a lot of events would have to be changed as well the the OOB. The Axis wear themselves out by the time they reach Smolensk and need a lot of boosters. The one thing the PO does well is build the rail network out but I think it cheats.ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
Just for grins I zoomed out and asked for all the tracks and this is what I saw. The
objectives go much further to the east than where the current front lines are. They
must have been optimistic for the Axis PO. I'll have to let Elmer play Elmer for 45
turns one of these days just to see if they can actually get out that far.
![]()