Stelteck
Moscow is isolated, still only the 7th panzer division guard it and so the soviet have a decent chance to free moscow one turn more. Worst case scenario we get moscow during the snow turns.
The jaws close around Moscow - but we fully expect them to be opened up again. Nevertheless we give the HQ of 7 panzer a new leader and stack it with support units to make its attack as painful as possible for our opponents.

Stelteck
Yes they really lack troops.
ANd the troops present did not have time to dig.
They needed 30 more divisions one month ago here
They probably should have scrapped other fronts. But difficult to do in multiplayer game
While it is true to some extent that playing a team side constrains you to a broad front strategy, I would contend that it does not necessarily prevent concentration of forces. By moving Centre's command boundaries with other commands towards the centre we have created our own concentration. The Soviet team equally could move their boundaries in a similar manner and may have done so. There is no reason that the Soviet South commander could not have their boundary with the West commander at the Oka. Or even at Moscow itself. However it would also mean every commander is involved in the battle for Moscow rather than strict demarcation of responsibilities. I believe with some imagination, but also some bureacracy and extra time, you could emulate anything you can do in a solo game within a team game.
It looks like almost everything is perfect, but ....

One setback as one of our airbases gets displaced during the go. More than 40 fighters, mostly Bf109E3s, get destroyed.

[/img]


























