Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi
Yeah, I was surprised at the inability to kill Hellcats today.

Keep in mind that fighters assigned to escort duty are at a disadvantage. That coupled with a superior A/C and you can't expect too much. Besides as you said they did their jobs and kept his fighters off your bombers. OTOH your fighters should do a bit better against his escorting fighters. Don't expect miracles, but you might get 1:1 if you have a numbers advantage over him. Its why I like the Zero 5c, good firepower against a disadvantaged opponent. At least I hope it works. Looks good on paper.[:D] At any rate you don't really want to down fighters do you? Its bombers you want.

Yeah, I know escort is tough on fighters. I'm always torn. Good pilots are shredded as much as mediocre pilots. It's a necessary evil.

I have Soryu carrying the M5c. They were set to 0 distance, to be used just for CAP over the TFs. Their range sucks. But in this case, the enemy carriers were all 2-4 hexes from my carriers. They would have flown escort. I wonder how they would have done?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Ok, next topic of discussion: IJA fighters

Here's what I have producing. Note that the Frank will start producing in a few days.

Model/Pool/Production

Ki-44-IIc Tojo / 63 / 120
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar / 67 / 128
Ki-100-II Tony / 56 / 120
Ki-84a Frank / 0 / 120

What should I change? scrap? increase? keep?

Keep in mind that I'm in late '42 in my game.

This is how I see it. Too many Oscars. When Frank comes online cut them in half or less and put 'em to Frank. I like the Oscar for late war escort, but you shouldn't need too many. BTW the Ki-43-IIIa has the longest range of all the Oscars. As for the Tojo and Tony, I'd probably reduce them by 25% and put that to Frank as well. Remember as you start to field Franks the other model pools will grow and the more limited use will mean less loss as the Franks take over. Just my .02 Mike. Let's see what the pros say, and then make a more educated choice.

People love the Frank. In all my years of playing this game, I've never had a Frank! This will be a first. I was planning on reducing the Oscar to about 100 in the pool and switch half or so of the factories to probably the Frank. I have only 2 sentai fielding the Oscar right now, one in China strafing troops with very good success and the other at Truk doing nothing. The Tony has been awful so far. They get shredded by the P47. The Tojo still is doing well against everything the Allies throw at them. They haven't fought the Hellcat yet though. The vast majority of the IJAAF is fielding the Tojo, but that'll change to the Frank soon.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi

I've got a question for you. Where's that CVL that builds in November '42 without its air groups. They inexplicable come in a year later, mistake I assume, but whatever. That's another 30 plane CVL that could have some LBA fighter group on it to up your CAP.

That's the Ryuho. She's currently at Ambon with 3 CVEs, in case Ted gets frisky there. Hosho will eventually move down there as well.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: rustysi
ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

Many of us had suggested and you agreed to get all your CV/CVLs back together. So I know you are kicking yourself for not following that "self" advice. [:D]

At least Mike had his other CVs within supporting distance. Ted didn't; he could have had the last strike if his other 2 or 3 CV/CVLs were closer.

Yep, I made a mistake, but salvaged it. Fortunately, it was MKB and 2 carriers survived. They're currently at Truk repairing damage.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: rustysi

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Ok, next topic of discussion: IJA fighters

Here's what I have producing. Note that the Frank will start producing in a few days.

Model/Pool/Production

Ki-44-IIc Tojo / 63 / 120
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar / 67 / 128
Ki-100-II Tony / 56 / 120
Ki-84a Frank / 0 / 120

What should I change? scrap? increase? keep?

Keep in mind that I'm in late '42 in my game.

This is how I see it. Too many Oscars. When Frank comes online cut them in half or less and put 'em to Frank. I like the Oscar for late war escort, but you shouldn't need too many. BTW the Ki-43-IIIa has the longest range of all the Oscars. As for the Tojo and Tony, I'd probably reduce them by 25% and put that to Frank as well. Remember as you start to field Franks the other model pools will grow and the more limited use will mean less loss as the Franks take over. Just my .02 Mike. Let's see what the pros say, and then make a more educated choice.

People love the Frank. In all my years of playing this game, I've never had a Frank! This will be a first. I was planning on reducing the Oscar to about 100 in the pool and switch half or so of the factories to probably the Frank. I have only 2 sentai fielding the Oscar right now, one in China strafing troops with very good success and the other at Truk doing nothing. The Tony has been awful so far. They get shredded by the P47. The Tojo still is doing well against everything the Allies throw at them. They haven't fought the Hellcat yet though. The vast majority of the IJAAF is fielding the Tojo, but that'll change to the Frank soon.


Ok, you didn't give us engine production and pools.

I would be loathe to eliminate any fighter production, especially if engine production and pools are strong. You simply need so many fighters!

You will want 250 plus Franks,plus you will want the Frank R (much better high altitude fighter).

As good as the Frank is, you need multiple frames to eke the most of your defense. Nowhere should you rely upon only one model of fighter, with the possible exception of deep defense versus long legged enemy bombers.

The A6M5c and Ki100 are your bomber killers. SR1 they can be sandwiched by Franks and Oscars for protection and can do very good work. The Oscar is your low altitude CAP and Escort when you need numbers. Tojo IIc flies at the 2nd highest CAP altitude setting ready to climb and dive.

Franks and Georges both make great escort fighters too, as do the Tojo IIc if you don't need range. 4 Squadrons of George escorting in a high altitude torpedo strike can penetrate Allied carriers at present and perform as a mild sweep against Hellcats.

The Oscar IIIa is a great long range escort, and especially valuable paired up with torpedo bombers and restricted search arcs to lay a deep strike on Allied shipping. I can't believe you only have two of them!

Your strongest defense against sweeping Jugs is a structured low altitude CAP with Georges and Franks although you can use many other combinations too. It is hard not to keep the George as a sweeping beast.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Here's the engine info:

Type / Pool / Production

Ha-32 / 499 / 270
Ha-33 / 574 / 420
Ha-34 / 708 / 360
Ha-35 / 606 / 540
Ha-45 / 976 / 660
Ha-60 / 380 / 0 - mistakenly built a bunch of these. Using them for the D4Y1/2.

Ha-43, in R&D, 4 factories on it (all I have for R&D), currently 5/45, will become operational 5/44.

Edit: Just starting the Frank-r. Will be operational 2/44.

Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Lowpe »

How about fighter bombers? What are you making - r&d'ing there?
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

Just a few things I wanted to say the other day, but forgot/ran out of time.
I bombarded again today. I’ve noticed their AV increased to about 15k while mine is still at 6k. I’ll let the supply replenish and then try a deliberate attack to see what I’m really up against. In the mean-time, I bomb daily with 130 or so Sallies.

I think you may be a little premature here. Think I wait a while and just keep bombing/bombarding for a bit more.
I suspected that was the case. Not sure which one though. First thought would be Wasp because she's the smallest. But look at the hits:

Yorktown: 2x500kg, 1x250kg, heavy fires, fuel storage explosion, don't think she sank.
Wasp: 2 torpedoes, 2x500, 1x250, heavy fires, heavy damage, fuel storage explosion.
Saratoga: 2 torpedoes, 5x500, 1x250, fires, heavy damage.

I'll take any (or all ) of them.

Been thinking about this as well. I still think its Wasp that went down, but the other two are in serious trouble. My guess is he looses at least one more even with no other attacks. I would suggest you try to dog 'em with whatever subs you have in the neighborhood, and from your screen shot there seem to be quite a few.

On a final note... I know I watch pilot fatigue closely, as I'm sure the rest of us do. One thing I learned the hard way a while back was to also keep an eye on CV A/C's fatigue levels. These really seem to ramp up after serious CV ops.

It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

Something else I just remembered.....

CVLs Mizuho and Nisshin (21 F and 9 TB each)

You don't really need TB's on either of these two, they have no torp capacity. I'd either fill them with fighters or some combo of fighters and DB's.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

That's the Ryuho. She's currently at Ambon with 3 CVEs, in case Ted gets frisky there. Hosho will eventually move down there as well.

Remember her air groups will arrive in Nov. '43.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

I have Soryu carrying the M5c. They were set to 0 distance, to be used just for CAP over the TFs. Their range sucks. But in this case, the enemy carriers were all 2-4 hexes from my carriers. They would have flown escort. I wonder how they would have done?

They are the first Zero with armor. Don't know how much that'll help, but....
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi

Something else I just remembered.....

CVLs Mizuho and Nisshin (21 F and 9 TB each)

You don't really need TB's on either of these two, they have no torp capacity. I'd either fill them with fighters or some combo of fighters and DB's.

Didn't know that! Mizuho will get fighters and Nissan (the slow poke) will get DBs for ASW for escort duty. Thanks!
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi
I have Soryu carrying the M5c. They were set to 0 distance, to be used just for CAP over the TFs. Their range sucks. But in this case, the enemy carriers were all 2-4 hexes from my carriers. They would have flown escort. I wonder how they would have done?

They are the first Zero with armor. Don't know how much that'll help, but....

I am aware of that. Short range but armor. CAP duty primarily.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi

Just a few things I wanted to say the other day, but forgot/ran out of time.
I bombarded again today. I’ve noticed their AV increased to about 15k while mine is still at 6k. I’ll let the supply replenish and then try a deliberate attack to see what I’m really up against. In the mean-time, I bomb daily with 130 or so Sallies.

I think you may be a little premature here. Think I wait a while and just keep bombing/bombarding for a bit more.
I suspected that was the case. Not sure which one though. First thought would be Wasp because she's the smallest. But look at the hits:

Yorktown: 2x500kg, 1x250kg, heavy fires, fuel storage explosion, don't think she sank.
Wasp: 2 torpedoes, 2x500, 1x250, heavy fires, heavy damage, fuel storage explosion.
Saratoga: 2 torpedoes, 5x500, 1x250, fires, heavy damage.

I'll take any (or all ) of them.

Been thinking about this as well. I still think its Wasp that went down, but the other two are in serious trouble. My guess is he looses at least one more even with no other attacks. I would suggest you try to dog 'em with whatever subs you have in the neighborhood, and from your screen shot there seem to be quite a few.

On a final note... I know I watch pilot fatigue closely, as I'm sure the rest of us do. One thing I learned the hard way a while back was to also keep an eye on CV A/C's fatigue levels. These really seem to ramp up after serious CV ops.


I haven't spotted the carriers up close since the battle. Still looking. Finding other ships though.

Aircraft fatigue is something I know nothing about. Can it decrease without maintenance? (Don't think so, but I really have no idea.) Anything in the manual I've missed? How about the forum?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

How about fighter bombers? What are you making - r&d'ing there?

I'll give you those numbers tonight after work.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16734
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: rustysi
That's the Ryuho. She's currently at Ambon with 3 CVEs, in case Ted gets frisky there. Hosho will eventually move down there as well.

Remember her air groups will arrive in Nov. '43.

Yep, I know. Been watching them inch close to arriving. [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by ny59giants »

CV/CVL air group management - I monitor both pilot fatigue and plane damage (time to repair). After prolong activity, I often have to fly off and transfer groups to a base to speed up recovery time. Often you will see 5 days or more time for planes to repair if on CVs. This is a very slow process. So, they go ashore. Your Judy and Jill with SR 2 or 3 need the extra time ashore to repair and recover, IMO.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: rustysi

Just a few things I wanted to say the other day, but forgot/ran out of time.
I bombarded again today. I’ve noticed their AV increased to about 15k while mine is still at 6k. I’ll let the supply replenish and then try a deliberate attack to see what I’m really up against. In the mean-time, I bomb daily with 130 or so Sallies.

I think you may be a little premature here. Think I wait a while and just keep bombing/bombarding for a bit more.
I suspected that was the case. Not sure which one though. First thought would be Wasp because she's the smallest. But look at the hits:

Yorktown: 2x500kg, 1x250kg, heavy fires, fuel storage explosion, don't think she sank.
Wasp: 2 torpedoes, 2x500, 1x250, heavy fires, heavy damage, fuel storage explosion.
Saratoga: 2 torpedoes, 5x500, 1x250, fires, heavy damage.

I'll take any (or all ) of them.

Been thinking about this as well. I still think its Wasp that went down, but the other two are in serious trouble. My guess is he looses at least one more even with no other attacks. I would suggest you try to dog 'em with whatever subs you have in the neighborhood, and from your screen shot there seem to be quite a few.

On a final note... I know I watch pilot fatigue closely, as I'm sure the rest of us do. One thing I learned the hard way a while back was to also keep an eye on CV A/C's fatigue levels. These really seem to ramp up after serious CV ops.


I haven't spotted the carriers up close since the battle. Still looking. Finding other ships though.

Aircraft fatigue is something I know nothing about. Can it decrease without maintenance? (Don't think so, but I really have no idea.) Anything in the manual I've missed? How about the forum?

Another approach is to 'downgrade' and then 're-upgrade' the airframes while in port. They'll act as if all the 'new' airframes are at "0" for maintenance once they're back on board. It may take a week or so to have all of them uncrated and available, so don't do this workaround if action is imminent.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: rustysi

Something else I just remembered.....

CVLs Mizuho and Nisshin (21 F and 9 TB each)

You don't really need TB's on either of these two, they have no torp capacity. I'd either fill them with fighters or some combo of fighters and DB's.

Will the TBs have access to 800kg bombs while on either of them?
Image
User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by rustysi »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: rustysi

Something else I just remembered.....

CVLs Mizuho and Nisshin (21 F and 9 TB each)

You don't really need TB's on either of these two, they have no torp capacity. I'd either fill them with fighters or some combo of fighters and DB's.

Will the TBs have access to 800kg bombs while on either of them?

AFAIK that's determined by unit exerience, so it wouldn't matter. If they pass the checks for said load it should just come from the ships' ops supply. Personally I'd rather have a dive bomber carry them for the better accuracy. To my knowledge though that won't happen until one of the last Judy versions. Not yet available, so...
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”