Tourney game amadeus (Axis) vs Mika (Allies)

[Amadeus]

I still disagree. For me I won this game. Any other unit in London would have been killed. Under these conditions it is nearly impossible to take London. But not because of good defense but a gamebreak AA unit.

[LLv34Mika]

I did the same in other games... with no success.
Well, not with no success, with a snowballs chance in hell of success!

Mr Sugar bombed the crap out of London in no time. That was really really really depressing.
And I guess there was another game (Sugar vs... can't remember, there is an AAR too) in which the British even had AA level 4 in cities (I only had 2) and it didn't help.

But it's hard to compare. We don't know the other circumstances. I will just try it myself to see what works and what does not work.

[Sugar]

I also tried to bomb the AA out of the city, and I should have succeeded with 10 bombers in the 3. run; but due to the losses in previous turns the predictions went into the ground, so I decided to 1. eleminate the belonging HQ and 2. to win air superiority. Next spring I landed a few units and took the city, and even if I had to hold the city for the next turn, there wa nothing left to counterattack.

I can`t see a gamebreaker, if I look at the stats your losses were too high in total and your focus an London too weak, Amadeus. I understand it`s frustrating, but I guess Du hast die Flinte zu früh ins Korn geworfen. Doesn`t look like a defeat for the Axis at all.

[James Taylor]

I'd say for tournaments there needs to be different victory conditions.

[Sugar]

Why not produce better balancing at first? These conditions were the same in Breakthrough SoE, and that was very well balanced, according to the best players I met.