Shikuka: Ditto.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition



ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
10/12/44
Shikuka: These bombers might be coming from enemy carriers at Ominato (sighted yesterday).
![]()
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
I might give it a try. Sounds sensible.
My concern about using a division reinforced with armor, engineers and arty is the 6k stacking limit. My experience has always been that anything at or above 3x does terrible things to supply. But at this point, I should be able to bring umpteen zillion supply.
I'll be back for Marcus later.



ORIGINAL: Commander Cody
I took about 10 days off from reading AARs and lo and behold, it's Sakhalin Armageddon 2: The Rematch. Thanks for this highly informative and entertaining AAR.
Regarding that Marcus invasion, I would humbly suggest landing everything on the first day. In my last Ironman campaign vs. computer IJ, I purposely sliced through the Marshalls and Carolines to get a better handle on atoll attacks. My typical force attacking a 6,000 stacking limit atoll would be 1.5-2 ID or MD, 2 arty bn, 2 tk bn, 1 combat eng bn or rgt and sometimes a corps HQ and/or amphib force HQ. I would land about 25,000 to 40,000 troops in the first two days (2-day turns). Each invasion TF would include LSTs, AKs and/or AKAs carrying only supply. In each case the atoll would be taken with enemy units destroyed and then I'd use empties to pick up the assault troops as I landed base forces on Day 3. [EDIT: I would also try to include 100-200 naval support in an eng amphib brigade, HQ or naval base force.]
So, in other words, I found you can seriously overstack atoll invasions as long as you have plenty of supply along that can be fed in each day. I also found you don't necessarily have to do shore bombardment in advance if the invasion force is big enough, although having slow BBs in the invasion TF is good.
Cheers,
CC




