Nothing too drastic but did engage in some low risk strat bombing to make the score board look a bit better [:D]

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition







What are your long-term plans for the aerial ASW?ORIGINAL: njp72
Thus far the Allies haven't played the game except to engage me aggressively with his subs.
ORIGINAL: ITAKLinus
A couple of things:
1) apparently in the MOD Japan gets incredibly stronger than in standard Scen1. Is it possible to hold a part of your conquests in the mid-term ? (either India or Australia)
2) Manchukuo Garrison at 8862?! I mean, how have you achieved that? I'm in Scen1 a couple of months before you and I still have Manchurian Garrison intact due to PP limitations
Broadly speaking, if you haven't seen his unrestricted reinforcements divisions, he will counterattack somewhere. Or he's garrisoning heavily both P.H. and Karachi: since their loss would be a fatal blow
Autovictory seems quite close
ORIGINAL: GetAssista
What are your long-term plans for the aerial ASW?ORIGINAL: njp72
Thus far the Allies haven't played the game except to engage me aggressively with his subs.
There are mixed views among JFBs about the extent of usage of IJAF bombers for ASW duty. It is a given that IJAF bombers gradually lose efficiency in the primary role as war progresses and Allies get capable fighters. By 44 the most useful duty for the bulk of the rank and file of IJAF bombers might indeed be ASW and training for Peggy torps (edit: oh, yea, and Kami training). However, the beginning years are tough to call. Some JFBs advocate earmarking a lot of groups for ASW training from the beginning, foregoing faster advancement in China and elsewhere where you can bomb Allies unhindered in 41-42. But on the other hand in the mid 42 you will be able to fly 70 skill ASW Sallies/Helens over most of your active routes, dishing out pain.
Thanks Francesco, I agree I need to maintain the initiative at least through 42 if not early into 43. With new airframes entering service soon, I should have good superiority with regards to carrier air which should prevent the Allies from getting too ambitious [:)]ORIGINAL: ITAKLinus
oh well more PPs are quite useful as Japanese since you can trash China and other funny places.
Allies do not really benefit from that from my point of view: they do not have the possibility to employ those units for offensive duties and since they are fighting overwhelming Jap units, they are at disadvantage no matter what they do.
In the long run, they also marginally benefit from having more naval assets since what they get is sufficient to mount multiple offensive. I do not think they can mount far more operations with more assets.
As far as I can understand you can maintain the strategic initiative well into 1943. On normal Scen1 I consider a strong success to maintain the initiative until JUN-1943 with the strongest offensive efforts ending in Fall '42
ORIGINAL: uncivil_servant
Personally I think the only thing stopping you from taking all of India and Australia (and more) is yourself. You are limiting what you take as to not take too much too soon and your opponent go "No Mas". You're in February and can take all of India, Australia, and soon China as you have posted zero battles where you were pressed. I really don't think all those "extra" allied PPs used to buy out units that will disappear for North Africa is going to matter as they would have to make it to India and Oz to fight you.




