Godzilla {J: Andav} vs. Rodan {A: witpqs}

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

1942 May 29

The remaining outback in China. That base force has marched all the way from Sining I think it was.

Image
Attachments
420530China3.jpg
420530China3.jpg (448.19 KiB) Viewed 382 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

1942 May 29

The front in Australia. Daly Waters has only a commando unit to protect it from para assault but will take in substantial forces withdrawing toward it.

Image
Attachments
420530Aus1.jpg
420530Aus1.jpg (467.01 KiB) Viewed 382 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

1942 May 29

The second line and reinforcements in Australia. Armoured units are moving up from Alice Springs, Cloncurry (after a TOE upgrade in 2 days) and Normanton. Infantry and artillery are also moving up from Alice Springs. Alice Springs and Cloncurry are also being built up as 4EB bases; Cloncurry has twice the engineers so should get on line sooner.

Image
Attachments
420530Aus2.jpg
420530Aus2.jpg (462.72 KiB) Viewed 382 times
dave sindel
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:51 pm
Location: Millersburg, OH

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by dave sindel »

Thanks for all the maps George.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18294
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by RangerJoe »

Thank you for the maps.

Are you thinking of withdrawing some Chinese forces into the mountains to be supplied from India? I am referring to the restricted ones that get trashed. Rebuilt, supplied, and trained then come out of the mountains into the hill and rough country to harass the Japanese?
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Thank you for the maps.

Are you thinking of withdrawing some Chinese forces into the mountains to be supplied from India? I am referring to the restricted ones that get trashed. Rebuilt, supplied, and trained then come out of the mountains into the hill and rough country to harass the Japanese?
The mountain bases is the last redoubt, so to speak. As much supply as possible is already being flown into China from India and that amount will increase as more and more C-47's come on line.

The Chinese Army units now at Ledo are likely the only ones which supply will help to grow unless and until the Allies are able to relieve the siege of China in a major way. The plan has been to use those units to safeguard that area of India so Allied units can invade somewhere behind Burma. If the Empire continues to thwart our plan by not sending forces across the Burma-India frontier we will go to plan B. Possibly - not sure - plan B will consist of sending those Chinese Army units into Burma after they have been fully fleshed out. There they can threaten, tie up units, etc while the Allies open another front.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18294
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by RangerJoe »

I was thinking that if you have units where most if not all of the squads and devices were disabled, then it might be better to move them where they could get supply from India and, if nothing else, be able to "repair" the disabled devices and squads without taking supply from Chinese bases. I can understand if a player does not do so since it will take a long time and things might move faster than it would take. Since I have played only the computer, I have never been in such a position to do so.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by zuluhour »

It looks like he wants China done. That is a lot of effort on Paoshan. If I am correct you should have ample time gather strength.
Supply for him will begin to get really tough in monsoon season and I expect the Chinese to pull off some decent defensive
actions for you. Some will be unexpected I'm sure. Any signs of prep for India? I think I asked you that a short time ago and
you thought he may make use of a lightly defended port for a beach head. I think he is to timid for this. Everything looks methodical
yet conservative, in my eyes. I know it's a lot easier looking in. Why he did not land directly on Darwin or at least Wyndham
is puzzling to me. This is where I get my conservative/timid view.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

I was thinking that if you have units where most if not all of the squads and devices were disabled, then it might be better to move them where they could get supply from India and, if nothing else, be able to "repair" the disabled devices and squads without taking supply from Chinese bases. I can understand if a player does not do so since it will take a long time and things might move faster than it would take. Since I have played only the computer, I have never been in such a position to do so.
The only supply flowing from India to China now is via aircraft.
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by zuluhour »

I missed the unit at Akyab. That is the most conservative rout to India. Did he walk there?
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

I missed the unit at Akyab. That is the most conservative rout to India. Did he walk there?
Yes, and long enough ago I am constantly surprised no enemy unit has appeared at Cox's Bazar. If he is coming to India at all it is either when he is good and ready or via another route.
User avatar
Rafid
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 3:26 pm

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by Rafid »

If he is serious about northern Australia he might not push into India at all. In your last game he played fairly conservative in terms of expansion and besides him beeing more aggresively in China this time he still is. So if Australia is major undertaking, he might not start a second push beyond the historical perimeter (though one might argue that a 1944 sucidal push into China is historical: Operation U-Go).
AFBTD
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 4:21 pm

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by AFBTD »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

1942 May 29

Overview map.

Image

[X(]

Anda ya¡...sera 1944
mis amigos; EL FRENTE ATLETICO, LA PANDA DEL MOCO, OCHAITA FANS
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: AFBTD

ORIGINAL: witpqs

1942 May 29

Overview map.

Image

[X(]

Anda ya¡...sera 1944
I don't understand? He has cleaning up to do, including most of the Gilbert Islands. Even so, he's got everything else historical and has not suffered any major losses.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Rafid

If he is serious about northern Australia he might not push into India at all. In your last game he played fairly conservative in terms of expansion and besides him beeing more aggresively in China this time he still is. So if Australia is major undertaking, he might not start a second push beyond the historical perimeter (though one might argue that a 1944 sucidal push into China is historical: Operation U-Go).
I don't know the limits of his objectives in Australia. He is serious about *northern* Australia but it's easy to smash in there and be ready to pull out important forces to save them when called for. He probably will at least send forces as far as they can go without meeting major resistance. When they do meet major resistance, what then? Does he reinforce? It's pretty hard to supply an overland offensive there. Does he spring 'the next' invasion into the Perth area or some other area? I could only guess and I'm not that good at guessing. I need to be on guard against this invasion and potentially plus the next one (just for the sake of argument, Perth area) pulling too many forces away from southeastern Australia. Weakening defenses there fatally would court disaster.

China is sort of its own beast versus historical in this game. Pressures there certainly reflect much of history, but the game's difficulty with certain things versus history makes it far more possible for a Japan player to conquer China and then redeploy large forces elsewhere. I want to put major pressure on the Empire to redeploy some forces before that happens and in that way shift the initiative. That's why summer the planned summer invasions instead of major reinforcements in areas still vulnerable.
User avatar
Macclan5
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:46 pm
Location: Toronto Canada

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by Macclan5 »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

I missed the unit at Akyab. That is the most conservative rout to India. Did he walk there?
Yes, and long enough ago I am constantly surprised no enemy unit has appeared at Cox's Bazar. If he is coming to India at all it is either when he is good and ready or via another route.

Guessing on my part of course.

1) Australia is a diversion.

Using a mock push in Australia to get you to divert US forces there as opposed to concentrating them for an earlier launch against the Gilberts or Marshalls. Further delays you advancing on Port Moresby if you are worried about Australia.

If Australia were the real intention I would have suspected a push from Perth as you noted / Darwin as a primary target - its not / perhaps even the North Eastern coastal landing supported from Port Moresby (already!). He had the Carriers there to do it and you could not have responded.

2) India

As I recall the last game - Cahm Rhan Bay , Vingh, French Indo China was essentially a hollow shell once you landed there. Further he did not have China in hand.

My guess is he wants China fully in hand - especially non coastal areas - to free up troops.

He is not over extending early in Burma - he is waiting for re-enforcement.

If he was going to "over extend" and push India early he would have already secured Port Blair and his "left shoulder".

I would guess he is coming in due time but not at the expense of hollowing out French Indo China nor being open to a back door counter like Cahm Rhan Bay - last game.


A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1942 May 29

Post by witpqs »

Thanks!
ORIGINAL: Macclan5

Guessing on my part of course.

1) Australia is a diversion.

Using a mock push in Australia to get you to divert US forces there as opposed to concentrating them for an earlier launch against the Gilberts or Marshalls. Further delays you advancing on Port Moresby if you are worried about Australia.
My current thinking on Port Moresby is to leave it for clean up operations long after bypassing the area.

If Australia were the real intention I would have suspected a push from Perth as you noted / Darwin as a primary target - its not / perhaps even the North Eastern coastal landing supported from Port Moresby (already!). He had the Carriers there to do it and you could not have responded.

2) India

As I recall the last game - Cahm Rhan Bay , Vingh, French Indo China was essentially a hollow shell once you landed there. Further he did not have China in hand.
I did keep the mountains and therefore tie up some additional troops (I mean additional beyond garrison requirements) but he was able to pull out many after deciding the mountain defenses were not going to crack on any practical time scale.

My guess is he wants China fully in hand - especially non coastal areas - to free up troops.
Agree. He's given early attention to breaking into the mountains but I have given early attention to fortifying that area. I am also hoping my cadre of Chinese Army units sent to India to thrive on Allied supply will provide some counterbalancing pressure.

He is not over extending early in Burma - he is waiting for re-enforcement.

If he was going to "over extend" and push India early he would have already secured Port Blair and his "left shoulder".

I would guess he is coming in due time but not at the expense of hollowing out French Indo China nor being open to a back door counter like Cahm Rhan Bay - last game.
India is strong enough now I think most likely any operation into India would be to grab Calcutta both to use the industry there and to deny to the Allies whatever is destroyed there after eventual recapture.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1942 May 30

Post by witpqs »

1942 May 30

INVADED
Amphibious TF 161 unloading at Bima
Amphibious TF 50 offshore of Kangean
Batavia, Changsha, Padang are also invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Boela is occupied by the Japanese
Japanese forces CAPTURE Bima !!!



Overall
• No carrier sightings.

• Withdrew a large number of air groups one day early today just to make certain I don't screw up and lose a zillion points by being late.


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near San Diego.


Pacific
• Enemy sub activity near Pago Pago.

• Pago Pago port is now size 4; with the size 5 air base stockpiles are now unlimited.


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Brisbane, Melbourne, Hobart.

• Another one bites the dust.
Ground combat at 65,129 (near Nookanbah)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 318 troops, 0 guns, 68 vehicles, Assault Value = 35

Defending force 42 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 34

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 34 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(-), disruption(-), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Allied ground losses:
52 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
8th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
Derby RAN Stn Base Force

• The Broome RAN Stn Base Force is facing destruction tomorrow or the next day.

• Fuel and Supply are unloading at Melbourne.

• Obviously KB1 will replenish before further operations, but what then? Perth? NE Australia? Adelaide?


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya
• Got one!
Sub attack near Soerabaja at 57,101

Japanese Ships
xAP Kashima Maru, Shell hits 17, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Stingray

xAP Kashima Maru is sighted by SS Stingray
SS Stingray attacking on the surface

• And another!
Sub attack near Boela at 80,110

Japanese Ships
xAKL Heiwa Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
PB Shonon Maru #11

Allied Ships
SS Snapper

SS Snapper launches 2 torpedoes at xAKL Heiwa Maru
PB Shonon Maru #11 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Shonon Maru #11 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Shonon Maru #11 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Shonon Maru #11 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Shonon Maru #11 fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


China
• Trying to keep our grip.


India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• The air group withdrawals have, uh, 'minimized' naval search activity from India. Replacements will be flying as soon as they learn to fly and get planes.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia


Complete combat report attached.
Attachments
combatreport.txt
(25.54 KiB) Downloaded 7 times
User avatar
zuluhour
Posts: 5244
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:16 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: 1942 May 30

Post by zuluhour »




India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• The air group withdrawals have, uh, 'minimized' naval search activity from India. Replacements will be flying as soon as they learn to fly and get planes.


[:D]
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1942 May 31

Post by witpqs »

1942 May 31

INVADED
Amphibious TF 50 unloading at Kangean
Amphibious TF 114 offshore of Kaimana
Batavia, Changsha, Padang are also invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Gorong is occupied by the Japanese
Japanese forces CAPTURE Kangean !!!



Overall
• No carrier sightings.

• CV Wasp has arrived at Balboa and is proceeding to Pearl Harbor with 3x DD.

• A number of TOE's upgraded today so the units affected should begin upgrading this next turn.


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near San Francisco.

• Empty troop convoy continuing peacefully back toward San Francisco.


Pacific
• A sizable convoy plying waters we do not want resupplied or reinforced.
Sub attack near Kusaie Island at 127,120

Japanese Ships
xAK Kohoku Maru
xAK Nishimi Maru
xAK Kunitu Maru
xAK Zuiko Maru
xAK Tamashima Maru
xAK Tateisi Maru

Allied Ships
SS Silversides

SS Silversides launches 2 torpedoes at xAK Kohoku Maru
Silversides diving deep ....
Sub escapes detection


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Brisbane, Aoba Island.

• Done.
Ground combat at 64,128 (near Derby)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 3686 troops, 32 guns, 17 vehicles, Assault Value = 101

Defending force 112 troops, 3 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 88

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 88 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender:
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Allied ground losses:
115 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
146th Infantry Regiment

Defending units:
Broome RAN Stn Base Force

• Fuel and Supply unloading at Melbourne.


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya
• Hanging on and making the Imperial chase them into the marshes!
Ground combat at 49,88 (near Singkep)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 4732 troops, 40 guns, 21 vehicles, Assault Value = 160

Defending force 709 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 12

Japanese adjusted assault: 134

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 134 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), morale(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
21 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
364 casualties reported
Squads: 14 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 23 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 2
Units destroyed 3

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
5th/B Division

Defending units:
Palembang Cdo
Riouw Cdo
PBg-Ld AA Afd
Palembang ML Base Force
Lahat Cdo

• Missed the escort.
Sub attack near Gorong at 82,112

Japanese Ships
PB Takunan Maru #5
xAK Syoto Maru

Allied Ships
SS Perch

SS Perch launches 2 torpedoes at PB Takunan Maru #5
Perch diving deep ....
PB Takunan Maru #5 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Takunan Maru #5 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Takunan Maru #5 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Takunan Maru #5 fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Takunan Maru #5 fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


China
• They are grinding us down but the process is slow in most places. The next place they will advance is Tienshui; a reinforcement unit is on the way in case there is time but likely not. It will not get them much.


India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• Enemy sub activity near Trivandrum, Karachi.

• The aircraft/troop convoy is one hex from Karachi with DL 3/3.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia
• Keeping them nervous in home waters.
Sub attack near Iriomote at 91,62

Japanese Ships
xAK Karachi Maru
xAK Ohio Maru
PB Kanko Maru

Allied Ships
SS Grampus

SS Grampus launches 2 torpedoes at xAK Karachi Maru
PB Kanko Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Kanko Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Kanko Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Kanko Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Kanko Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


Complete combat report attached.
Attachments
combatreport.txt
(28.29 KiB) Downloaded 8 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”