Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Moderator: MOD_Command
RE: US Army / USMC Units
Please consider adding Aster 30 Block 1NT. thanks
-new Ka band seeker
-capable against ballistic missiles up to 1500 km range
-development scheduled to be complete 2023, production year after
https://www.mbda-systems.com/wp-content ... s.docx.pdf
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... le-defense
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ility.html
file:///C:/Users/Peter%20Kruk/Downloads/2016-06-14-France-and-Italy-Join-Together-to-Develop-Aster-30-Block-1-NT.pdf
-new Ka band seeker
-capable against ballistic missiles up to 1500 km range
-development scheduled to be complete 2023, production year after
https://www.mbda-systems.com/wp-content ... s.docx.pdf
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... le-defense
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ility.html
file:///C:/Users/Peter%20Kruk/Downloads/2016-06-14-France-and-Italy-Join-Together-to-Develop-Aster-30-Block-1-NT.pdf
RE: US Army / USMC Units
Spooky timing in relation to the post above. The Block 1 Aster 30 NT is already in the database but it's unusable since the Sylver A50 mount is not compatible with it. I've been trying to equip Type 45 destroyers with it but it seems that there isn't a compatible mount so the missile is unusable at the moment. Can we add some Sylver mounts to the weapon please?
-
TheOriginalOverlord
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: The Marines
RE: US Army / USMC Units
Could we get the USS Des Moines 1957 from CWDB put in here along with a "hypothetical" version with late 80s upgrades like this?
Des Moines class late 80's upgrade...4 x CIWS (white) 4 x Mk141 quad (yellow) 2x quad ABL tomahawk (red) Figure in new radars and ECM same as the Iowas etc... an Iowa "lite" if you will

Thanks!
Des Moines class late 80's upgrade...4 x CIWS (white) 4 x Mk141 quad (yellow) 2x quad ABL tomahawk (red) Figure in new radars and ECM same as the Iowas etc... an Iowa "lite" if you will

Thanks!
Semper Fi!
Jeremy

Jeremy
RE S-400 40N6
https://www.armyrecognition.com/july_20 ... sting.html
S-400 batteries with 40N6 both Russian and Chinese are dated from 2017 and 2018 respectively and the missile itself from 2013, this appears too optimistic based on reports the testing has only just been completed.
Could I suggest an in service date of late 2019 appears more realistic?
This ties in with apparent issues with the production facilities.
https://russiandefpolicy.blog/tag/9m96/
Regards
K
S-400 batteries with 40N6 both Russian and Chinese are dated from 2017 and 2018 respectively and the missile itself from 2013, this appears too optimistic based on reports the testing has only just been completed.
Could I suggest an in service date of late 2019 appears more realistic?
This ties in with apparent issues with the production facilities.
https://russiandefpolicy.blog/tag/9m96/
Regards
K
-
miller7219
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:59 am
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
Exploring the Columbian Navy. Could the new Patrol Zone Maritime platforms be added:
PZE-46 De Julio [Fassmer-80]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_a ... mbian_Navy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patruller ... %C3%ADtima
PZE-46 De Julio [Fassmer-80]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_a ... mbian_Navy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patruller ... %C3%ADtima
P-40 Long Track radar should be 3-D capable
Sensor DB ID 966: Long Track [P-40] mobile radar is a 3-D capable device but defined as only 2-D in v474 of DB3000. This sensor should be capable of returning altitude data which it currently does not. The description also says 2-D. Pictures show multiple feed-horns associated with 3-D operation.
[Not yet allowed to post links - see Wikipedia entry for P-40 radar]
Affected Units:
#1321 Algeria
#2649 Angola
#3144 Bulgaria
#305 Cuba
#1338 Czechoslovakia
#1474 Germany DDR
#2171 Greece
#1763 India
#1339 Iran
#1696 Iraq
#1340 Libya
#1286 Russia
#2565 Serbia
#270 Soviet Union
#1285 Syria
#1300 Ukraine
#2455 Yemen
#2564 Yugoslavia
[Not yet allowed to post links - see Wikipedia entry for P-40 radar]
Affected Units:
#1321 Algeria
#2649 Angola
#3144 Bulgaria
#305 Cuba
#1338 Czechoslovakia
#1474 Germany DDR
#2171 Greece
#1763 India
#1339 Iran
#1696 Iraq
#1340 Libya
#1286 Russia
#2565 Serbia
#270 Soviet Union
#1285 Syria
#1300 Ukraine
#2455 Yemen
#2564 Yugoslavia
RE: P-40 Long Track radar should be 3-D capable
Aircraft >> Russia #2510 An-22 Cock has in its description:
The GBU-44 originated out of the canceled 1990s BAT projectile, which was to have been an anti-tank guided cluster weapon. The BAT technology (and some actual prototype airframes) were converted into the Viper Strike missile, which is extremely useful in urban areas where collateral damage must be limited. Initially deployed by US Army MQ-5 Hunter UAV’s in 2003, it was also adopted by the USAF in late 2006 on AC-130 Spectre gunships and MQ-1 Predator UAVs.
The rest of it looks correct, just the description is off.
Is there a way to copy text when looking at the db viewer? I copied that from cmano-db.com.
The GBU-44 originated out of the canceled 1990s BAT projectile, which was to have been an anti-tank guided cluster weapon. The BAT technology (and some actual prototype airframes) were converted into the Viper Strike missile, which is extremely useful in urban areas where collateral damage must be limited. Initially deployed by US Army MQ-5 Hunter UAV’s in 2003, it was also adopted by the USAF in late 2006 on AC-130 Spectre gunships and MQ-1 Predator UAVs.
The rest of it looks correct, just the description is off.
Is there a way to copy text when looking at the db viewer? I copied that from cmano-db.com.
RE: F-35 External Loadout
I found this photograph on the USMC's website of an F-35B test flight. It looks like an external load of 4 GBU-12s. I figured you guys might want to add it to the "beast mode" configurations which would give the F-35B a whopping 8 GBU-12s. Man... the firepower is overwhelming...
https://www.marines.mil/Photos/igphoto/2001665682/
https://www.marines.mil/Photos/igphoto/2001665682/
RE: F-35 External Loadout
Can we get some boat capacity added to USN LPH's? Acknowledge that they don't have a well deck but there are certainly enough photos of lifeboats hanging from davits. (the DB photo for #677 for instance)
I'm looking for a few RHIBs, ROVs and PEP-104s, particularly for LPH 10 Tripoli in her MCM support work.
I don't have data for the request but believe it is reasonable to assume she carried support RHIBs and spare ROVs for the MCM vessels.
Thanks
I'm looking for a few RHIBs, ROVs and PEP-104s, particularly for LPH 10 Tripoli in her MCM support work.
I don't have data for the request but believe it is reasonable to assume she carried support RHIBs and spare ROVs for the MCM vessels.
Thanks
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Type 055 DDG Updates Request
Request the following updates to the Type 055 (Renhai) DDG/CG:
- change VLS quantity to 112 (currently 128)
- update radar to type 364B (currently 364A)
- add HHQ-9B (200km range) and HQ-9C (active homing) to DB
- add WS-64 ASBM to DB and VLS loadout
- add Sino-ESSM as hypo weapon to VLS loadout
- change helo hangar size to 2 medium (currently small)
Sorry, can’t post reference links as I don’t have enough previous posts to be allowed to do it.
Thanks!
- Tom
- change VLS quantity to 112 (currently 128)
- update radar to type 364B (currently 364A)
- add HHQ-9B (200km range) and HQ-9C (active homing) to DB
- add WS-64 ASBM to DB and VLS loadout
- add Sino-ESSM as hypo weapon to VLS loadout
- change helo hangar size to 2 medium (currently small)
Sorry, can’t post reference links as I don’t have enough previous posts to be allowed to do it.
Thanks!
- Tom
RE: Type 055 DDG Updates Request
Please consider adding AS-17D (KH-31 AD/PD) to Su-34 loadout.
Thanks
Thanks
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
As far as I know, South Korea A330 MRTT has a flying boom system. But CMANO's South korea MRTT has wing drogue refueling system. Because of this, All South Korea aircraft cannot be refuelled by MRTT.
I hope it gets fixed soon.
I hope it gets fixed soon.
RE: Type 055 DDG Updates Request
Can you please add the following ground vehicles to the DB3000?
M4 Sherman - Generic
M-47 Patton - Generic
M-48 Patton - Generic, Spain, South Korea, Turkey
SU-100 - Generic
M18 Hellcat - Generic
M36 Jackson - Generic
MT-LB - Generic
M-60 APC - Yugoslavia
M-80 APC - Yugoslavia
TAB APC - Romania
BDRM-2 - Generic
M4 Sherman - Generic
M-47 Patton - Generic
M-48 Patton - Generic, Spain, South Korea, Turkey
SU-100 - Generic
M18 Hellcat - Generic
M36 Jackson - Generic
MT-LB - Generic
M-60 APC - Yugoslavia
M-80 APC - Yugoslavia
TAB APC - Romania
BDRM-2 - Generic
RE: F-35 External Loadout
ORIGINAL: SeaQueen
I found this photograph on the USMC's website of an F-35B test flight. It looks like an external load of 4 GBU-12s. I figured you guys might want to add it to the "beast mode" configurations which would give the F-35B a whopping 8 GBU-12s. Man... the firepower is overwhelming...
https://www.marines.mil/Photos/igphoto/2001665682/
The F-35 only carries 2x bombs internally (except for SDBs that fit 8 internally on BRU-61s).
Lockheed recently published a bunch of papers through the AIAA on the F-35's development and they've handily included the following chart that lists the loadouts certified for Block 3F (also 2B previously):

- Attachments
-
- F-35 Block..adouts 1.jpg (682.5 KiB) Viewed 776 times
RE: F-35 External Loadout
Please Add KRI 521. Teluk Lada. IOC 2018-19
http://www.janes.com/article/81460/indo ... nding-ship
Good Datas
http://www.janes.com/article/81460/indo ... nding-ship
Good Datas
Indonesian shipbuilder PT Daya Radar Utama (DRU) launched a 117 m-long tank landing ship (LST) for the Indonesian Navy (Tentara Nasional Indonesia - Angkatan Laut: TNI-AL) on 28 June at the company’s facilities in Bandar Lampung on the island of Sumatra.
Named KRI Teluk Lada (with pennant number 521), the LST entered the water in a ceremony presided over by Indonesian Defence Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu, according to a statement issued by the TNI-AL that same day.
The platform, which is powered by two 3,285 kW engines, has a top speed of 16 kt, with a range of about 6,240 n miles at 13 kt.
The 16.4 m-wide vessel can carry up to 15 BMP-3F infantry fighting vehicles and a 10-tonne helicopter on its flight deck, as Jane’s reported in November 2016. The BMP-3Fs are currently operated by the Indonesian Marine Corps.
The LST can be equipped with up to two 40 mm gun systems on the foredeck, and 12.7 mm machine guns at various locations throughout the vessel.
The shipyard had previously built a similar but slightly longer ship, KRI Teluk Bintuni , which is now in service with the TNI-AL as a carrier for the army’s Leopard 2A4 main battle tanks (MBTs).Indonesian shipbuilder PT Daya Radar Utama launched the 117 m-long LST KRI Teluk Lada on 28 June at the company’s facilities in Lampung. (TNI-AL)
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: F-35 External Loadout
Ex English HMS Ocean get Brazil name and Pennant
A140 Atlantico
Source and infos on radar, weaps
http://www.janes.com/article/81405/braz ... er-carrier
A140 Atlantico
Source and infos on radar, weaps
http://www.janes.com/article/81405/braz ... er-carrier
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Type 055 DDG Updates Request
Some corrections:ORIGINAL: tshugart3
- add HHQ-9B (200km range) and HQ-9C (active homing) to DB
- add WS-64 ASBM to DB and VLS loadout
- add Sino-ESSM as hypo weapon to VLS loadout
- change helo hangar size to 2 medium (currently small)
- HQ-9B is there and has IR active homing, HQ-9C is still a rumor
- WS-64 is built for slant-launch, no sign of VLS capability
- The best I can think of ESSM hypothetical for China is quad-packed HQ-17 (Tor-copy, it's in database). The 850mm UVLS support shorter missiles too.
- Just clarify the larger hangars are for Z-20, not Z-18 because it's too big.
RE: Type 055 DDG Updates Request
About the HQ-9B:
Recent US sources suggest that the HQ-9B deployed on those artificial island bases have around 200km range. Seems to be an improved variant. And from official posters of Zhuhai Airshow we also know that the seeker is actually active radar.
About the Type 055's hangar and the Z-18 size: The Z-18 actually isnt too big when folded. There have been some discussions going on at various chiense defense forums and it is actually agreed upon that size wise; the Ka-31/Ka-28 is the one requiring the largest hangar due to its non-foldable tail and height. If the hangar can take a Ka-31 (as the Type 052C already can), then housing a Z-18 wouldnt be a problem at all. Of course, weight is another question here.
Recent US sources suggest that the HQ-9B deployed on those artificial island bases have around 200km range. Seems to be an improved variant. And from official posters of Zhuhai Airshow we also know that the seeker is actually active radar.
About the Type 055's hangar and the Z-18 size: The Z-18 actually isnt too big when folded. There have been some discussions going on at various chiense defense forums and it is actually agreed upon that size wise; the Ka-31/Ka-28 is the one requiring the largest hangar due to its non-foldable tail and height. If the hangar can take a Ka-31 (as the Type 052C already can), then housing a Z-18 wouldnt be a problem at all. Of course, weight is another question here.
RE: Type 055 DDG Updates Request
A bunch of SDF members are exchanging insults over this graph:

The reverse-search on Google only have one article to be found, and it's just a week ago. The leaked document image shows the alleged Chinese-developed glider rounds can reach above 100km, with over 25km of max altitude, while it will start gliding at 15km altitude. Such trajectory is very identical to the Italian VULCANO.

This is VULCANO 127mm by comparison. The Chinese one have some substantially bigger wings and canards, but lacks of fletching, and presumed to be attached with rocket booster instead.
http://news.ifeng.com/a/20180714/59173189_0.shtml (Simplified Chinese)
The response is mainly skeptical, but at the same time reasonable because China is building large amount of 052D and 055 destroyer, PLAN also has severe shortcoming of land-attack roles especially the lacks of information to VLS cruise missiles. The new addition of Sino-VULCANO can be an expensive but practical interm for some amphibious military operations.
My guesstimate of this round would be only HE variant only, specially for long range artillery strike instead of anti-ship or anti-air. The GPS(Beidou)/INS guidance is more likely applied than laser guidance since Chinese doesn't have Spec-Ops insertion or aerial deep strike capabilities to deploy forward-operated laser designation yet. The rest of vague information are too ambitious for my taste. The new round will also be ready alongside with 055's commission, which is probably at 2020 or even earlier.

The reverse-search on Google only have one article to be found, and it's just a week ago. The leaked document image shows the alleged Chinese-developed glider rounds can reach above 100km, with over 25km of max altitude, while it will start gliding at 15km altitude. Such trajectory is very identical to the Italian VULCANO.

This is VULCANO 127mm by comparison. The Chinese one have some substantially bigger wings and canards, but lacks of fletching, and presumed to be attached with rocket booster instead.
http://news.ifeng.com/a/20180714/59173189_0.shtml (Simplified Chinese)
Translation:
"China has developed the 130mm glider ammunition with 100km range. It has canards for steering, glider wings and rocket stage to achieve extra range, they will be deployed once it reached to the highest altitude. If wings aren't deployed, it can only reach 70km compare to 100km. It also has multiple methods of guidance, such as laser guiding, or GPS/INS guidance at terminal stage. Multiple variant of warheads can also be installed, including HE-Frag, HEDP, DPICM, Thermobaric and more."
The response is mainly skeptical, but at the same time reasonable because China is building large amount of 052D and 055 destroyer, PLAN also has severe shortcoming of land-attack roles especially the lacks of information to VLS cruise missiles. The new addition of Sino-VULCANO can be an expensive but practical interm for some amphibious military operations.
My guesstimate of this round would be only HE variant only, specially for long range artillery strike instead of anti-ship or anti-air. The GPS(Beidou)/INS guidance is more likely applied than laser guidance since Chinese doesn't have Spec-Ops insertion or aerial deep strike capabilities to deploy forward-operated laser designation yet. The rest of vague information are too ambitious for my taste. The new round will also be ready alongside with 055's commission, which is probably at 2020 or even earlier.
MQ-8C with Osprey radar
Additional information Osprey radar for MQ-8C. Please consider adding. thanks
Osprey multi mode surveillance radar:
file:///C:/Users/Peter%20Kruk/Downloads/Osprey_AESA_Radar_mm08527%20(1).pdf
AESA
air-to-air and air to surface radar
x-band
range- 200nm
http://www.leonardocompany.com/en/-/leo ... ey-us-navy
https://news.usni.org/2017/12/12/fire-s ... r-datalink
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... prey-radar
https://www.militaryaerospace.com/artic ... ships.html
Osprey multi mode surveillance radar:
file:///C:/Users/Peter%20Kruk/Downloads/Osprey_AESA_Radar_mm08527%20(1).pdf
AESA
air-to-air and air to surface radar
x-band
range- 200nm
http://www.leonardocompany.com/en/-/leo ... ey-us-navy
https://news.usni.org/2017/12/12/fire-s ... r-datalink
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... prey-radar
https://www.militaryaerospace.com/artic ... ships.html


