Naval and Defense News

[xavierv]

more info:
Russia's Krylov Research Center Unveils Light Aircraft Carrier Design

The Krylov State Research Center (KGNC) has presented the model of a light multi-purpose aircraft carrier at the Army-2018 International Military-Technical Forum for the first time. It is on display at the Krylov’s exhibition stand.

"The light multipurpose aircraft carrier is designed to ensure combat sustainability of the fleet’s forces and weapons which are engaged in hostilities in blue and green waters by fulfilling anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense tasks as well as by destroying air, surface, underwater and onshore targets," KGCN said in its documents.

The light aircraft carrier’s standard displacement is 37000 tons; normal displacement - 40500 tons and full displacement - 44000 tons.

more: https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.p ... esign.html

[Dysta]

An alleged new silo in China was found by Google Satellite image.

https://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive ... pen-silos/

It is reported the opening diameter is smaller than DF-5, and it's unlikely to built a new one for older ballistic missiles like DF-4. The website speculated it's possibly the fix-based DF-41 launch site that progressed to silo-based system. Wherether it is the difficulty of mobile-launch vehicle development, or a specific renewal for current ICBM bases are still not confirmed yet.

[Hongjian]

Official photo of two of the elusive Type 09IIIA Improved Shang-class SSN.
Hump, but no VLS. Humpback is speculated to house a new/larger reactor. The 09IIIB in comparisson has a more pronounced humpback.

[kevinkins]

MALD-X in the news:

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/23 ... ounds-like

[Filitch]

New terrorist provocation. Coming soon... US Navy and USAF highly likeli are as stooges.

http://tass.com/defense/1018635
https://www.rt.com/news/436812-syria-ch ... ovocation/

[Dysta]

ORIGINAL: Filitch

New terrorist provocation. Coming soon... US Navy and USAF highly likeli are as stooges.

There are some abundant of old tomahawks that need to be disposed after few years. It's time to put them in good use.

[Filitch]

I knew that you agree that USN and USAF are serving terrorists.

[Filitch]

Sea trials of Nanchang (pennant number 101) - type ship of Pr.055

https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3318760.html

[Dysta]

ORIGINAL: Filitch

I knew that you agree that USN and USAF are serving terrorists.

I am more inclined to believe it's just another drama to use Syria to play tug-of-war with a lot of countries involve in it. Will Russia be really serious about it?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08- ... rovocation

[Scorpion86]

https://economics.unian.info/10237167-u ... ntury.html

An interesting summary of Ukraine's recent efforts in the fields of air combat, air defense and electronic warfare. Apparently, they have been investing a lot on new counter-battery radars, UAVs, jammers and ground-based ELINT assets, as well as pushing to update and upgrade legacy aircraft (MiG-29, Su-27, Su-24, Su-25 and Mi-24) and missile systems (S-300, Tor, Buk, and surprisingly, S-125).

[User2]

ORIGINAL: Scorpion86
as well as pushing to update and upgrade legacy aircraft (MiG-29, Su-27, Su-24, Su-25 and Mi-24) and missile systems (S-300, Tor, Buk, and surprisingly, S-125).

I wonder how are they going to maintain S-300 components which were never produced in Ukraine and what are they going to do with S-300PS missiles whose guaranteed lifetime has already been exceeded.

[Dysta]

ORIGINAL: User2

I wonder how are they going to maintain S-300 components which were never produced in Ukraine and what are they going to do with S-300PS missiles whose guaranteed lifetime has already been exceeded.

This ring my bell too. How Ukraine still have some modernized military equipments that is still can be used and even sold like T-84 and Zubr.

A simple answer would be a western involvement to improve Soviet equipments, it did worked for many countries already. But for something so advanced like digital electronics and composite materials for aircraft engines are beyond my guesses.

[xavierv]

China's 28th Type 054A Frigate Commissioned with PLAN South Sea Fleet

The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN or Chinese Navy) commissioned its 28th Type 054A Frigate (Jiangkai II-class) 'Xianning' (咸宁 with hull number 500). The Commissioning ceremony took place on August 28, 2018 at (what seems to be) Yulin Naval Base located in the Yalong Bay (city of Sanya) on Hainan island. The frigate joined the PLAN South Sea Fleet.

https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.p ... fleet.html

First PLAN Type 055 Destroyer 'Nanchang' Started Sea Trials in China

Based on ship spotters images from China, it appears that the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN or Chinese Navy) first Type 055 Destroyer 'Nanchang' (南昌, with hull number 101), sailed out for its first sea trials on 24 August, 2018. The vessel (first of the Renhai-class cruiser, its NATO designation and classification) was built at Jiangnan Changxing Shipbuilding and Heavy Industry Corporation (Jiangnan-Changxing) in Shanghai (a member of China State Shipbuilding Corporation CSSC).

https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.p ... china.html

PLAN's 50th Type 056 Corvette 'Wuzhou' Launched by Shipyard in Southern China

What is likely the fiftieth Type 056 Corvette (Jiangdao class) for the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN or Chinese Navy) was launched in early August. The vessel to be named Wuzhou (梧州) with hull number 626 was built and launched by the Huangpu Wenchong Shipyard of the Chinese naval group CSSC.

https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.p ... china.html

[xavierv]

U.S. Navy Awards Boeing Contract to Design & Build MQ-25A Tanker Drone

The U.S. Navy awarded a contract to The Boeing Co. Aug. 30 for the MQ-25A Stingray, the first operational carrier-based unmanned refueling aircraft. This fixed-price-incentive-firm-target contract with a ceiling price of $805.3 million provides for the design, development, fabrication, test, delivery, and support of four MQ-25A unmanned air vehicles, including integration into the carrier air wing for an initial operational capability by 2024.

When operational, MQ-25 will improve the performance, efficiency, and safety of the carrier air wing and provide longer range and greater persistence tanking capability to execute missions that otherwise could not be performed.

Boeing was competing against designs by Lockheed Martin and General Atomics.

https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.p ... drone.html

LIG Nex1 on Track with New Tiger Shark Heavyweight Torpedo

LIG Nex1 is right on track with its Tiger Shark Heavyweight Torpedo System program, Navy Recognition has learned from the South Korean defence company. The Tiger Shark was unveiled last year during the MADEX 2017 naval defense exhibition in Busan, South Korea.

LIG Nex1 is in charge of developing the new torpedo with ADD (Agency of Defense Development) and the Republic of Korea Navy (ROK Navy). "Currently, we have done and fulfilled all the required tests, and are waiting the contract with DAPA for mass-production; of that we are expecting the second half of next year" said an LIG Nex1 representative involved with the program when we asked him about the current status of Tiger Shark. DAPA is South Korea's defense acquisition program administration.

https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.p ... rpedo.html

[kevinkins]

A contrary (sort of) view on last week's NY Times piece on China's build-up.

https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2018/0 ... rd%20Brief

[Dysta]

UK has no ship to solve Scallop War at the backyard, then why they could meddle SCS with her naval disposal?

https://theworldnews.net/my-news/exclus ... ds-sources

The HMS Albion, a 22,000 ton amphibious warship carrying a contingent of Royal Marines, passed by the Paracel Islands in recent days, said the sources, who were familiar with the matter but who asked not to be identified.

The Albion was on its way to Hanoi, where it docked on Monday following a deployment in and around Japan.

One of the sources said Beijing dispatched a frigate and two helicopters to challenge the British vessel, but both sides remained calm during the encounter.

The other source the Albion did not enter the territorial seas around any features in the hotly disputed region but demonstrated that Britain does not recognise excessive maritime claims around the Paracel Islands. Twelve nautical miles is an internationally recognised territorial limit.

------------------------

A contrary (sort of) view on last week's NY Times piece on China's build-up.

Both NYT and D1 are missing the point, especially referring to the buildup with 2018 DOD Report.

It's neither a hype nor a misconception, it's just a simple sovereign ambition within China's own paths and interests, and lots of countries underestimating Chinese advancement as to be easily challenged militarily. China is just proving them it will be a grave mistake to keep antagonize her.

It just happened to be improving so rapidly that making all the long-term plans looks very short, which is unfortunate for some countries who try to asymmetrically undermine it.

[Dysta]

10 years ago, USAF made a bad decision regarding to the F-22 production. Whether Gates believes China cannot challenge USAF even after 2020, or F-35 production can proceed flawlessly, a mistake is still a mistake:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... anard.html

Finally, it quotes a Beijing report titled "China's National Defense in 2006" as stating that China "pursues a three-step development strategy in modernizing its national defense." The first step: "[L]ay a solid foundation by 2010." Second: Achieve "major progress by 2020." Third: Be "capable of winning [information-technology] wars by mid 21st century."

In other words, it's worth keeping an eye on China. But it's probably not worth spending tens or hundreds of billions of dollars now for a program like the F-22, which its own sponsors admit might be needed in case a threat develops 20 years in the future.

[jtoatoktoe]

ORIGINAL: Dysta

10 years ago, USAF made a bad decision regarding to the F-22 production. Whether Gates believes China cannot challenge USAF even after 2020, or F-35 production can proceed flawlessly, a mistake is still a mistake:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... anard.html

Finally, it quotes a Beijing report titled "China's National Defense in 2006" as stating that China "pursues a three-step development strategy in modernizing its national defense." The first step: "[L]ay a solid foundation by 2010." Second: Achieve "major progress by 2020." Third: Be "capable of winning [information-technology] wars by mid 21st century."

In other words, it's worth keeping an eye on China. But it's probably not worth spending tens or hundreds of billions of dollars now for a program like the F-22, which its own sponsors admit might be needed in case a threat develops 20 years in the future.

The F-22/F-35 Hybrid Lockheed Martin is pushing for Japan (and Maybe the U.S.) could go a long way in righting the wrongs in the F-22 program.

[Hongjian]

New image showing the Chinese J-10B TVC testbed. Recently, there have been consistent reports about certain breakthroughs in single-crystal compressor blade manufacturing, as well as rumors about the impeding "production version" of the J-20 equipped with the WS-15 TVC capable engine being readied for mass production.

[kevinkins]

Another analysis that provides a less than "the sky is falling" review of China's geopolitical position moving forward.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/China-i ... rd%20Brief

The writer does not come up with anything really new and restates ideas that have been around for years now.

Good summary of the situation re: Syria early September '18.

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/23 ... ed-to-know

Kevin