If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.
Post Reply
jjdenver
Posts: 2480
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:07 pm

If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Post by jjdenver »

Once Egypt is conquered should Axis attack Syria? Saudi Arabia? Or just push into Iraq always?

Thanks
AARS:
CEAW-BJR Mod 2009:
tm.asp?m=2101447
AT-WW1:
tm.asp?m=1705427
AT-GPW:
tm.asp?m=1649732
User avatar
Taxman66
Posts: 2311
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:28 pm
Location: Columbia, MD. USA

RE: If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Post by Taxman66 »

Careful with Saudi. There are a lot of very inconvenient partisan spawn hexes.

On the other hand they start sening mpp convoys to the US as soon as they are slightly pro Allied and the US is in the war.
"Part of the $10 million I spent on gambling, part on booze and part on women. The rest I spent foolishly." - George Raft
jjdenver
Posts: 2480
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:07 pm

RE: If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Post by jjdenver »

So it sounds like Saudi not usually done and not a good idea?

And Syria? Leave it alone since it's going to swing Vichy countries against Germany? Or take it to provide more routes/bases for attacking Iraq? It seems that attacking Iraq through the long desert road will be hard without Syria or Saudi to serve as another set of air bases and approach routes? Or am I mis-understanding how it goes? Have never fought there so need viewpoint of someone who has. Thanks.
AARS:
CEAW-BJR Mod 2009:
tm.asp?m=2101447
AT-WW1:
tm.asp?m=1705427
AT-GPW:
tm.asp?m=1649732
Sugar
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 11:42 am

RE: If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Post by Sugar »

To DoW Syria may also influence Turkey, and Saudi-Arabia is best occuppied from both sides to prevent the convoy from running in case it isn't already (and won't provide a shortcut into Iraq). To attack Iraq you better bring more than one HQ to secure supply, all routes are vulnerable to strat. attacks. Be aware chaining isn't perhaps working as expected due to a bug, which will be corrected in the next patch.
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Post by sPzAbt653 »

If you are trying to secure the Middle East as the Axis, then you need to take Saudi Arabia otherwise it could become an Allied Base. Saudi is not an easy capture, it is a long way to its capital and supply is bad enough to require two HQ's for a decent offensive there from Palestine south to Saudi's capital. If you declare war on Saudi, the Allies will be able to Operate Air Units there, and could transport units to the Saudi east coast via its one port there. Once captured, you must keep a decent garrison in Saudi to combat partisans and prevent the Allies from assaulting it from the seas.

Syria is very easy to take, but it has Political consequences so you might want to be careful. I have played entire games without touching Syria, but generally if I have overwhelming Axis strength in the Mid-East, then I will bowl over Syria because it has the only rail line that runs from Egypt to Kuwait, and that is fairly important.
User avatar
Robert24
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:17 am

RE: If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Post by Robert24 »

If I am successful in Egypt there is no reason to go into Iraq right away. I'll sit in Jordan and force the UK to spend MPPs on Iraq's defense. The MPPs I don't use for a cross desert trek into Iraq are used for Turkish diplomacy. After Turkey is Axis I am in one of the best positions to flank the USSR in the Caucuses and the UK in Iraq.
Sugar
Posts: 940
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 11:42 am

RE: If Cairo falls should Saudi Arabia be attacked?

Post by Sugar »

Iraq is worth 70 MPPs/turn, perhaps not the best idea to wait.
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”