Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Enforcer
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:34 am
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Fla
Contact:

Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Enforcer »

I cannot get my cv's to launch any more than 30 or so planes can someone help me?

I am uploading 4 images



Image
Attachments
1.jpg
1.jpg (728.54 KiB) Viewed 618 times
Enforcer
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:34 am
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Fla
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Enforcer »

second image

Image
Attachments
2.jpg
2.jpg (627.25 KiB) Viewed 618 times
Enforcer
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:34 am
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Fla
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Enforcer »

third image


Image
Attachments
3.jpg
3.jpg (634.66 KiB) Viewed 618 times
Enforcer
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:34 am
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Fla
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Enforcer »

forth image


Image
Attachments
4.jpg
4.jpg (449.77 KiB) Viewed 618 times
Enforcer
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:34 am
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Fla
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Enforcer »

does anyone have any idea?
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by btd64 »

I put my squadrons on 20 to 30% search. That seems to help....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by BillBrown »

Were there other targets available? Did your search find them? So many questions.
Enforcer
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:34 am
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Fla
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Enforcer »

i will try search but I have Tone, Chikuma, and 2 BB's I generally search with... but I will try some val's on search
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20686
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by BBfanboy »

Range could be an issue for Kates armed with torps. They can only do "normal" range, not "extended" with that kind of load. Sometimes weather is an issue for being able to launch torp-armed aircraft too. Vals are much lighter with a smaller weapon load so they can launch in almost any weather (shorter take-off run, less issues with a heaving deck).
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Enforcer
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:34 am
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Fla
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Enforcer »

i was only at 4 hexs from the transports
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by BillBrown »

Always keep in mind, it is not what you see or know, it is what the TF commander sees or knows that makes the difference.
User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Barb »

1. Detection of the target (via Air search or Float planes, or sub spotting or surface contact)
2. Size of the target (no purpose sending 150 planes against couple of transport)
3. Target priority or threat (CV, CVE, BB, CA, CL, DD, other stuff)
4. Weather (bad weather can affect strike size as well as parcel it out, not to mention it effects DL too)
5. Leader rolls (CV TF leader, Air group leaders - failed roll here could mean 25% of the strike/group strength)
6. Expected opposition (heavy CAP can force strike to seek other targets or not fly at all)

You can effectively affect points No. 1 and 5. Other depends on your opponent or game rolls :)
Image
User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by inqistor »

All groups should be set to the same altitude (and 5000 is IIRC Low Naval already), for best coordination chance.

But it seems to me, that target TF had too few ships for CVs to send more planes.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20686
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: inqistor

All groups should be set to the same altitude (and 5000 is IIRC Low Naval already), for best coordination chance.

But it seems to me, that target TF had too few ships for CVs to send more planes.
The threshold for low naval was changed from" below 6000 feet" to "below 2000 feet" years ago, at the same time glide bombing was eliminated from the game's algorithm. I think the change was to put Low Naval in range of IJN light AA, because it lacked much medium AA to engage at 6000 feet.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Reluctant Admiral Mod - CV strike issues

Post by Lokasenna »

This seems like a detection level issue.

The problem should be solved with more/better search.
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”