Notes from a Small Island

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Night fighters can allegedly sweep, but I'm not sure I ever got any of them to ever fly. Likewise for nighttime LRCAP, at least in terms of effectiveness.

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I've never had a Night Fighter squadron fly a sweep or strafe mission. Not one.

They'll quite happily mount airbase attack missions at 100 ft. All indications from the manual are that they should be able to perform sweep missions, but from my initial testing I've not seen it happen.

It may be the case that the manual isn't accurate, but more likely it's just difficult to get NF's to perform a sweep. At any rate, it's not as it should be, as the Allied NF intruder missions over Germany should be repeatable in the Pacific.
MBF
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:13 pm

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by MBF »

Curious you don't have any luck with it ... hmmm

From my most recent turn vs AI (26March1945):


Night Air attack on Hiroshima/Kure , at 106,58

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 34 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J1N1-Sa Irving x 7

Allied aircraft
F6F-5N Hellcat x 6

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
F6F-5N Hellcat: 2 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x F6F-5N Hellcat bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 1000 lb GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
210 Ku S-3 with J1N1-Sa Irving (1 airborne, 2 on standby, 1 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 10000 and 30610.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 21 minutes
S-851 Hikotai with J1N1-Sa Irving (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 6000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 6000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 3 minutes

Some CAP have air radar

tarkalak
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:49 am
Location: Bulgaria

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by tarkalak »

ORIGINAL: MBF

Curious you don't have any luck with it ... hmmm

From my most recent turn vs AI (26March1945):


Night Air attack on Hiroshima/Kure , at 106,58

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 34 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J1N1-Sa Irving x 7

Allied aircraft
F6F-5N Hellcat x 6

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
F6F-5N Hellcat: 2 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x F6F-5N Hellcat bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 1000 lb GP Bomb


CAP engaged:
210 Ku S-3 with J1N1-Sa Irving (1 airborne, 2 on standby, 1 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 10000 and 30610.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 21 minutes
S-851 Hikotai with J1N1-Sa Irving (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 6000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 6000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 3 minutes

Some CAP have air radar


Those are bombing not sweeping.
I do not know what is scarier: that I do understand nothing of this demonic script or that I am starting to see the demons that it evokes.

Me, studying for a PHD entry exam in Applied Mathematics.
MBF
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:13 pm

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by MBF »

Ahhh - that may be what I am seeing - those night fighters with bombs will sometimes engage and/or attack the airfields - I'll keep an eye out to see if I ever get any sweeps to work but as pointed out I was doing an airfield attack
Bearcat2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 12:53 pm

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Bearcat2 »

Dropped in to say Thanks for the AAR!

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by JohnDillworth »

ORIGINAL: MBF

Ahhh - that may be what I am seeing - those night fighters with bombs will sometimes engage and/or attack the airfields - I'll keep an eye out to see if I ever get any sweeps to work but as pointed out I was doing an airfield attack
Ahhh - that may be what I am seeing - those night fighters with bombs will sometimes engage and/or attack the airfields - I'll keep an eye out to see if I ever get any sweeps to work but as pointed out I was doing an airfield attack

Interesting though. Dan, what about night bombing airfields with 1 and 2 engine bombers? Yon have some hellcats and probably TBF's that are night equipet, no?
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Canoerebel »

We have a house rule that limits the number of night bombers to 50 per airfield (I don't know whether that means 50 coming from any particular friendly airfield or 50 targeting any particular enemy airfield).

I've tried a variety of night bombing missions against ports and airfields, basically with no success at all. I especially like using the British 4EB, of which I have 4 or 5 squadrons at Shikuka. They never do anything, so I only try it rarely.

Damaging enemy aircraft doesn't accomplish much either. Erik simply rail transports them to another base, and they're back online in a couple of days, even with high service ratings.

When the Bihoro campaign is completed, I'll have a good rail network that will allow me to use aircraft forward and rail the damaged ones to more remote fields. I'll also have proximity to his big bases from Tokyo north, allowing Allied fighters to sweep or escort. So I'll be trying a variety of strategies, hoping to find something that works and hoping to learn that Erik is suddenly (and unexpectedly, from my perspective) having some trouble maintaining good CAP over all the potential targets. Night bombing will be employed too.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Canoerebel »

ORIGINAL: Bearcat2
Dropped in to say Thanks for the AAR!

Thanks for reading, Bearcat (and all you other gentlemen). I read everything posted here.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: tarkalak

ORIGINAL: MBF

Curious you don't have any luck with it ... hmmm

From my most recent turn vs AI (26March1945):


Night Air attack on Hiroshima/Kure , at 106,58

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 34 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J1N1-Sa Irving x 7

Allied aircraft
F6F-5N Hellcat x 6

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
F6F-5N Hellcat: 2 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x F6F-5N Hellcat bombing from 6000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 1000 lb GP Bomb


CAP engaged:
210 Ku S-3 with J1N1-Sa Irving (1 airborne, 2 on standby, 1 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 10000 and 30610.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 21 minutes
S-851 Hikotai with J1N1-Sa Irving (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 6000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 6000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 3 minutes

Some CAP have air radar


Those are bombing not sweeping.

Yeah, there seems to be something that makes NF fighter sweep very elusive. Night airfield attacks are fine, but I'm not sure about naval or ground attack.


ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

We have a house rule that limits the number of night bombers to 50 per airfield (I don't know whether that means 50 coming from any particular friendly airfield or 50 targeting any particular enemy airfield).

I've tried a variety of night bombing missions against ports and airfields, basically with no success at all. I especially like using the British 4EB, of which I have 4 or 5 squadrons at Shikuka. They never do anything, so I only try it rarely.

Damaging enemy aircraft doesn't accomplish much either. Erik simply rail transports them to another base, and they're back online in a couple of days, even with high service ratings.

When the Bihoro campaign is completed, I'll have a good rail network that will allow me to use aircraft forward and rail the damaged ones to more remote fields. I'll also have proximity to his big bases from Tokyo north, allowing Allied fighters to sweep or escort. So I'll be trying a variety of strategies, hoping to find something that works and hoping to learn that Erik is suddenly (and unexpectedly, from my perspective) having some trouble maintaining good CAP over all the potential targets. Night bombing will be employed too.

IMO, the purpose of night airbase bombing isn't focused on destroying or damaging planes. It's a nice bonus, but the big win is the morale of air groups.

A serious night bombing raid on a large airbase sends the morale of the squadrons stationed at that base into the dirt. Sure, you might only destroy or damage ten or twenty planes, but if there's ten squadrons that have their morale knocked back less than fifty, that's a lot of combat effectiveness lost. It works very well in a one-two combo with daytime sweeps. Send in the night bombers to plaster the base, send in the sweepers to maul the demoralized leftovers.

This is a large part of why I strongly dislike house rules, especially regarding night bombing. There's a lot of tactical flexibility that's just waved away as "Oh, we don't do that here.". The arguments about night bombing being broken just don't stand up to close scrutiny.

The trick to good night bombing raids is mass. If you send five hundred bombers at a target at night, mabye half get lost, but even then you've still 250 bombers smashing the target.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19520
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by RangerJoe »

The trick to good night bombing raids is mass.

"Use mass not driblets" Heinz, or he said something like that.

Me: "Why use a little hammer if you have a big one!"

Of course, using Hellcat NFs from the DS would open up a lot of new targets for you, either now or later.

Targeting every possible target with 50 bombers at night might be tedious but it would show up the vulnerable targets. But when the HR is 50 bombers per target, that would not include fighters at night, would it? A lot of your fighters do carry a decent bomb load even if they are not that effective as fighters during the day.

I also read from someone that when he transferred NFs that they did not seem to fly their first night. So bouncing from target to target in disparate areas could work nicely if the defender reacts to defend what you just targeted. So if there was little to no defensive NFs for that target, maybe target for a second night but no more.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Lokasenna »

It's the Mahan doctrine but for air power, which is itself just a restatement of a gazillion other military theorists on the concentration of power vs. splitting it.
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Canoerebel »

Erik sent a courtesy note that he's still mulling over this turn - that it might be a few more days before he sends it. He mentioned something vague about evaluating things or taking stock of things. I don't know if something happened that has him muttering dark things, if he's trying to take stock of the overall situation, or if it's something else. You'll know when I do (or perhaps before, if he's addressing it in his AAR).
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20686
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by BBfanboy »

In the main forum Nemo reappeared and after some discussion, indicated he was interested in looking at some late-game PBEMs from the Japanese side. One of the AARs suggested to him was Obvert's. There could be some "collusion" going on! [:D]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Canoerebel »

That would be nightmarish. Erik's doing well enough without turning into the Hulk.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Barb »

You should try NF in LRCAP role to support your Night bombers. We do know the NFs work in CAP role. And those equipped with radar should at least disrupt enemy NF force. This would however work only on short range.

Night bombing even if limited to 50 bombers per target can affect enemy air unit morale - even without single plane destroyed. Being bombed at airfield isn't good for daylight fighter jockeys :) Targeting airfields on Hokkaido each night will eventually drive enemy air unit morale down.

Do not hesitate to use British night bombers in the role - they are lightly armed for daylight fight anyway and usually carried more bombs than their daylight counterparts (hint here - look for UK planes in BLACK underside camouflage and "B." in name - those white with "GR." are really a Naval Search/ASW Coastal Command type planes).

BTW.. to decrease your fighter ops losses in the current fight - you should fly shortest possible range, not long range sweeps. Even few squadrons based on Wakkanai/Kushiro sweeping enemy CAP would suffer less losses to OPS than the same squadrons flying all the way from Shikuka/Toyohara.
Image
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Canoerebel »

Still no word from Erik.

Three days, no turn. That's hard, so I've filled the time by auditioning for The Nutcracker. I'm aiming for the role of the guy who wears tights and prances about the stage.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Still no word from Erik.

Three days, no turn. That's hard, so I've filled the time by auditioning for The Nutcracker. I'm aiming for the role of the guy who wears tights and prances about the stage.

THE guy? [:'(]
The Moose
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Canoerebel »

This guy.

Image
Attachments
Cavalier2.jpg
Cavalier2.jpg (49.4 KiB) Viewed 437 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20686
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by BBfanboy »

Well the legs look like a mountain-hiker's, but I think you need to insist they let you wear your Confederate pea-jacket and boots.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: Notes from a Small Island

Post by Canoerebel »

Erik sent the turn yesterday evening but offered no explanation as to what had prompted him to push the pause button for a few days. I'll run the turn today.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”