Oh yeah.. "Joss".. your image made me laugh..
Korsun today, tomorrow Stalingrad?
- Rob Gjessing
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 5:09 am
- Location: Sydney Australia
- Contact:
Any limitations in terms of map size would be overcome. Like I have said before, whilst I dont speak for SSG, I understand that they have some big plans here.. dependent on how well KP sells I spose.. so buy one for yourself, one for your girlfriend (she'd be the perfect woman is she played too right?
), one for your dad, one for your grandpa and one for the next door neighours dog..
Oh yeah.. "Joss".. your image made me laugh..
Oh yeah.. "Joss".. your image made me laugh..
Isn't that bizarre?
No, please not a african scenario this is boring :p I would like:
A full east front campaign

If not posible
:
1. Stalingrad/Caucasus
2. D-Day/Normandie
3. Zitadelle (Kursk) maybe including the Orel area.
"Die Höhen von Seelow" (04/1945) would also nice or a italy campaign or so. But russian front is still the best and most interesting.
A full east front campaign
If not posible
1. Stalingrad/Caucasus
2. D-Day/Normandie
3. Zitadelle (Kursk) maybe including the Orel area.
"Die Höhen von Seelow" (04/1945) would also nice or a italy campaign or so. But russian front is still the best and most interesting.
My Steam Profile: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198022087017/
My Steam Curator-Page: https://store.steampowered.com/curator/ ... pid=275290
My Steam Curator-Page: https://store.steampowered.com/curator/ ... pid=275290
For Barbarossa, you could divide it up: AGN, AGC and AGS. It's really an exciting situation.
I'd also like a France 1940 operation.
Some folks had mentioned that Crete and/or a N. Afrika operation originally were considered to be included w/ KP. Crete and, of course, N. Afrika would be awesome.
So would Sicily, for that matter... =P
I'd also like a France 1940 operation.
Some folks had mentioned that Crete and/or a N. Afrika operation originally were considered to be included w/ KP. Crete and, of course, N. Afrika would be awesome.
So would Sicily, for that matter... =P
-
"Joss" Osborne
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 8:46 am
Originally posted by Rob Gjessing
Any limitations in terms of map size would be overcome. Like I have said before, whilst I dont speak for SSG, I understand that they have some big plans here.. dependent on how well KP sells I spose.. so buy one for yourself, one for your girlfriend (she'd be the perfect woman is she played too right?), one for your dad, one for your grandpa and one for the next door neighours dog..
Oh yeah.. "Joss".. your image made me laugh..![]()
This is good to hear, as I'm actively soliciting all my SPWAW friends to buy,buy buy!
For those who don't know, the image I posted is from my first exploratory bumblings with the editor.
For those of you with questions...yes, you can create you're own tile sets (Photoshop is NOT included
Yes, the editor is not documented and Roger has promised us more with Normandy game, but after having spent weeks with an undocumented editor in the game "Bltzkrieg" this wasn't such a mystery. Though there are some quirks.....
Regards,
Joe "Joss" Osborne
Joe "Joss" Osborne
-
Kent Pfeiffer
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2001 10:00 am
Originally posted by Titan
Another which would be very interesting would be operation Typhoon,it would could be a real thriller for the Germans to do better than they did historically,and it is a battle that is not depicted to often
That one would be at the top of my list. It has two great things going for it: the two sides are fairly evenly matched and it's one of the very few single operations that could have changed the outcome of the war. It's surprising that Typhoon is so rarely depicted in computer wargames, especially since some of the best board wargames ever made, like SPI's Operation Typhoon, GMT's Typhoon!, and The Gamers' Guderian's Blitzkrieg cover it.
Roger Keating has already leaked on a Wargamer AAR that the next game after Normandy will be Barbarossa. I will prefer the latter, since Normandy invasion games are my least favorite games. Barbarossa at the Division level as planned is good, although I prefer a corps level game a la The Russian Campaign.
I think that the suggestion for a France 1940 game is a good one.
One problem with the excellent TAO is that the Germans have no chance at all (as historically) of reaching Liege, even against the most incompetent play. There should be an option for "unrealistic" results that cold be fun.
I can't comment on this aspect of Korsun Pocket, since so far I have played only the ahistgorical "Wiking Whiteout" addon scenario (see my AAR on the war-historical usenet forum).
henri
I think that the suggestion for a France 1940 game is a good one.
One problem with the excellent TAO is that the Germans have no chance at all (as historically) of reaching Liege, even against the most incompetent play. There should be an option for "unrealistic" results that cold be fun.
I can't comment on this aspect of Korsun Pocket, since so far I have played only the ahistgorical "Wiking Whiteout" addon scenario (see my AAR on the war-historical usenet forum).
henri
Originally posted by Kent Pfeiffer
That one would be at the top of my list. It has two great things going for it: the two sides are fairly evenly matched and it's one of the very few single operations that could have changed the outcome of the war. It's surprising that Typhoon is so rarely depicted in computer wargames, especially since some of the best board wargames ever made, like SPI's Operation Typhoon, GMT's Typhoon!, and The Gamers' Guderian's Blitzkrieg cover it.
Got The Gamer's Guderian II recently, GREAT fun. Would make a good WG and have considered doing parts with the Editor ?!
The Gamers's Operational Combat Series treats the situations interestingly. One could in principle do DBWWII on any of the OCS games.
A question though - great to see the decisive battles done well with this engine, but perhaps would be good to not simply do all the HPS games again, but deal with less well covered ones instead.
Tunisia is a great match, even with a lot of opportunities...
Hube's Pocket would eb interesting and contemporary with Khorsun (similar balance, familiar to Korsun players) - am tentatively going to do this one with the Editor
Kiev/Zhitomir also interesting.
Post-Kursk Ukraine - tough for the Germans. Can you do as well as von Manstein?
Italy has not been covered enough by board or PC games.
My €0.04
Cheers
Space§man
Originally posted by elmo3
Can you post a link for that AAR Henri? I can't find it at their site. Thanks.
www.wargamer.com/wachtamrhein
Click on replays on the left menu and choose the top one.
In fact it is a replay of The Ardennes Offensive version that comes with KP, but this new version has the same engine. Keating's comment about Barbarossa is in the comments of one of the early turns. And it was written some time ago...
Henri
tanks
P.S. - Never did find the comment. Guess we'll just have to wait and see what is after Normandy.
I'm hoping Stalingrad myself.
P.S. - Never did find the comment. Guess we'll just have to wait and see what is after Normandy.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw
WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
- Rob Gjessing
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 5:09 am
- Location: Sydney Australia
- Contact:
Originally posted by Henri
Roger Keating has already leaked on a Wargamer AAR that the next game after Normandy will be Barbarossa.
A full barbarossa campaign would be awesome
My Steam Profile: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198022087017/
My Steam Curator-Page: https://store.steampowered.com/curator/ ... pid=275290
My Steam Curator-Page: https://store.steampowered.com/curator/ ... pid=275290
-
Matt Erickson
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:22 am
- Location: santa barbra, calif
This may make for too large a game, but I vote for Stalingrad as long as it includes Operation Blue (42 Summer Offensive). The attacks from Voronezh in the north, Crossing the Don, the assault on Sevastopol/ Crimea and the march By Army Group B (von Paulus and Hoth) on Stalingrad plus the attack of Army Group A (List, Manstein & Kleist) towards the Caucasas would make for some incredible manuver warfare. Course operation Uranus by the Russians would need to be included to balance play for both sides IMO. I think that just the Battle of Stalingrad after Uranus had isolated it would be more of a set piece battle. Give me open terrain, the playground of armor. 
never in driblets, but in mass
-
Matt Erickson
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:22 am
- Location: santa barbra, calif
more, more, more
The whole Stalingrad campaign, including Wintergewitter, would be an unparalleled wargaming experience - offensives on both sides, desperation, heroism, etc. Italy? Exciting at the beginning, then dull. France 1940? Intriguing, if you know the history - not a slam-dunk for the Germans. Same goes for my hopeless and forlorn hope - Case White (Poland).
- Belisarius
- Posts: 3099
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact:
Typhoon.
That'd be really interesting, can you do better than history? It think the format would lend itself quite well to that operation, too. Lots of surprised units in the beginning, and the Red Army recieving more and more reinforcements the closer to Moscow it gets, and a bazillion strongpoints/partisans popping up everywhere.
That'd be really interesting, can you do better than history? It think the format would lend itself quite well to that operation, too. Lots of surprised units in the beginning, and the Red Army recieving more and more reinforcements the closer to Moscow it gets, and a bazillion strongpoints/partisans popping up everywhere.




