A Question for our Russian Members

Armored Brigade is a real-time tactical wargame, focusing on realism and playability
Post Reply
Werewolf13
Posts: 515
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 8:11 pm

A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Werewolf13 »

There seem to be a number of Russian members and maybe some - now defunct - Warsaw Pact nation members participating on this forum and that got me to wondering, thinking about the past and my experiences in the US Army.

I served during the Cold War and when ever the subject of it going hot came up the term we used for our potential opponents was always, "The Commies". Russian, Warsaw Pact, Chinese. Didn't matter - they were, "the Commies". It was never said in a derogatory way - we knew they'd be tough opponents.

A recent thread I read here on the AB forum used that exact term to describe the game opponent, Commies, and it got me to wondering; what did the Russian army troops call us Americans, the Germans and the Brits? What about Warsaw Pact troops? What did they call us.

I am truly interested in knowing. And don't pull any punches. I'm very curious?
Freedom is not free! Nor should it be. For men being men will neither fight for nor value that which is free.

Michael Andress
User avatar
Blond_Knight
Posts: 998
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 3:52 am

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Blond_Knight »

In a similar vein, Ive always been fascinated with Soviet equipment since an OPFOR class in AIT at Benning.
Id like to know about what it was like to be a Soviet tanker and be an AT3 Sagger operator.
Rosseau
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:20 am

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Rosseau »

I think the tankers were generally uncomfortable in the cramped Soviet tanks of that era. David Isby's "Weapons and Tactics of the Soviet Army" (circa 1985) is very dated, but does shed some light on early '70s to '80s.
User avatar
ivanov
Posts: 1111
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:16 pm
Location: European Union
Contact:

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by ivanov »

I can only speak from the Polish perspective. During the Cold war, propaganda used to call the West "imperialists" and the Americans were just the "yanks". But in the 80's, the regular soldiers of the WP satellite armies, would be just too happy to cross the line and defect to the imperialists [:D]
Lest we forget.
User avatar
fritzfarlig
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:49 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by fritzfarlig »

the east germans call you "die Amis" the polish just say "kurwa" [:D]
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by kevinkins »


[/quote]
WP satellite armies, would be just too happy to cross the line and defect to the imperialists

I am surprised the informal code name was not "Santa Claus".
“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
DwarfHeretic
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:08 am

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by DwarfHeretic »

Probably russian forces mostly understand american forces as only real opponent if situation became hot. I'm don't surely know, but i asked my grandad and he answered, that they say yankee if meant NATO, even if they meant other members of pro-american alliance.
User avatar
Blond_Knight
Posts: 998
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 3:52 am

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Blond_Knight »

ORIGINAL: Rosseau

I think the tankers were generally uncomfortable in the cramped Soviet tanks of that era. David Isby's "Weapons and Tactics of the Soviet Army" (circa 1985) is very dated, but does shed some light on early '70s to '80s.

I actually have that book. :)
But I remember in Viktor Suvorov's books he talks about training in the 60's, Id just like to have another voice confirm or elaborate on things first-hand like how reliable were the armored vehicles?
What was training like?
User avatar
PoorOldSpike
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: Plymouth, England

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by PoorOldSpike »

I read a book some 30 years ago (sorry can't remember the title) which quoted various NATO and Warsaw Pact commanders, and one comment that's stuck in my mind was by a Russian General(?) who said something like-
"The American serviceman is a technician, used to operating complicated high-technology equipment at the touch of a button with the aid of onboard computers which could blow a fuse at any time, whereas the Soviet serviceman relies more on his own hands to operate his rugged and tougher tanks and vehicles."
"Fight with your brain first and your weapons second!"
Sorrow_Knight
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:57 pm

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Sorrow_Knight »

ORIGINAL: Werewolf13

There seem to be a number of Russian members and maybe some - now defunct - Warsaw Pact nation members participating on this forum and that got me to wondering, thinking about the past and my experiences in the US Army.

I served during the Cold War and when ever the subject of it going hot came up the term we used for our potential opponents was always, "The Commies". Russian, Warsaw Pact, Chinese. Didn't matter - they were, "the Commies". It was never said in a derogatory way - we knew they'd be tough opponents.

A recent thread I read here on the AB forum used that exact term to describe the game opponent, Commies, and it got me to wondering; what did the Russian army troops call us Americans, the Germans and the Brits? What about Warsaw Pact troops? What did they call us.

I am truly interested in knowing. And don't pull any punches. I'm very curious?

As I know (I probably may mistake in details, cause i was born in 1987 and I was only 4-5yo when USSR crushed) there was "Possible Enemy" (official propaganda), "Yankee", "Amers" (second still in use)... Mostly NATO forces associate with US Army as the main opponent, so, i haven`t heard any nicknames for french, west german or british armies, but I think, that there was some in certain armies\divisions.
Sorrow_Knight
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:57 pm

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Sorrow_Knight »

ORIGINAL: Blond_Knight


I actually have that book. :)
But I remember in Viktor Suvorov's books he talks about training in the 60's, Id just like to have another voice confirm or elaborate on things first-hand like how reliable were the armored vehicles?
What was training like?
I can say only that Suvorov is heavily antisoviet in his books. I haven`t read any of him about Cold War period, but, I`ve read his WWII books, and think, that he barely changed his mind when wrote about later periods... so... there was not so bad as he may write =)
User avatar
CCIP-subsim
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 6:59 pm

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by CCIP-subsim »

The closest counterpart in Russian would be "burzhui" (буржуи) - meaning "bourgeois", a catch-all term for Westerners. It is still just as commonly used to refer to foreigners today [:)]

For Americans specifically - the already-mentioned Yankee and Gringo, the derogatory "amerikos" (singular; plural is "amerikosy"), "amerikashka" (pl. "amerikashky" - a portmanteau that could be translated as "ameriturd") "pindos" (pl. "pindosy" - weird etymology with this one, it's a word that originally referred to Greek settlers in the Black Sea region, but today specifically means "american soliders" and sounds derogatory).

In general, it obviously depends on the soldiers and their units themselves, but I never got the impression that Soviet soldiers in the Cold War were particularly indoctrinated against American/NATO troops, and overall probably had a somewhat better (but still very limited) understanding of their opponent's culture than vice versa.
My dad, for example, when he served in the Soviet army in the 70s as a radio man mostly spent his days at a remote outpost on the Kola Peninsula, using government-issue receiver equipment to listen to rock music on the BBC (Deep Purple, Zeppelin, Queen, Black Sabbath, Uriah Heep, and so on) without having to deal with the radio jamming that was always a problem for that in civilian life. That was the only part of his service he actually enjoyed [:D]
User avatar
altipueri
Posts: 1055
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:09 am

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by altipueri »

Uriah Heep ? I bought an album by them about 1970 because I liked the tank on the cover.
Red2112
Posts: 1355
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:02 pm

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Red2112 »

The album is called "Salisbury", great album by the way, I still have it. Related this album with a YT video I did of Avalon Hill´s "Panzer Blitz", basically because both are clasics of the same era [:)]
Dreamslayer
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 1:37 pm
Location: St.Petersburg

RE: A Question for our Russian Members

Post by Dreamslayer »

But I remember in Viktor Suvorov's books...
OMG [:D]
Post Reply

Return to “Armored Brigade”