Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Broncepulido
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Broncepulido »

Also only experimiental use cited here:

https://testpilot.ru/russia/mikoyan/kh/22/

Quote:
Аппаратура головки самонаведения первоначально отрабатывалась на летающей лаборатории Ту-16К-22.

Google Translator:
The equipment of the homing head was initially worked out on the Tu-16K-22 flying laboratory.
orca
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by orca »

Can the following units be made available for cargo:

Multi-Mission Launcher [15 cells]
NASAMS (with MIM-120B)
vehicle (AN/TPQ-36A)
vehicle (NTAS FLIR/LR)
radar (AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR)

I'm hoping to use them in a scenario I'm currently working on.

thanks for considering
LORDPrometheus
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:25 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by LORDPrometheus »

New request.

Can the semi-cancelled MEADS System be added as a hypothetical unit to the USA, Germany, and italy?

Missile is Patriot-PAC-3 supplemented by IRST-SL for german systems. It is 360 degree fire capable.

Not a ton of details on the radar used but the fire control radar is an x-band AESA made in germany not much available. The surveillance radar haseven less information and is listed as 'UHF' on wikipedia. My bet is it is either c band or D band and based on the AN/FPS-117 as it appeares to have the same shape and dimensions. This is also supported by Lockheed Martin being the contractor for the missiles and Surveillance radar.
Broncepulido
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Broncepulido »

HMS Queen Elizabeth gets her Phalanx Block !B:
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/aircraf ... ns-fitted/
jun5896
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:29 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by jun5896 »

F-23 Black Widow II(2016) radar range is only 120nm.

Please upgrade AN/APG-77(v)1 AESA long-range.
jun5896
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:29 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by jun5896 »

I think Japan will possess aircraft carriers. They announced Izumo-class can convert ski-jump carrier, Also they has plan to purchase 42 F-35B.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/18/asia ... index.html
orca
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by orca »

Is it possible to make M142 HIMARS transportable as cargo on a C-130? It seems it should be based on DB mass, area data in DB but I'm not able to load. Using db build 476 and command v1.14 build 998.15.

thanks

https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/spec- ... 1702362936
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M142_HIMARS
User avatar
KC45
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:35 pm
Location: JPN

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KC45 »

By the KDX-1 illuminated P-1 incident, P-1 detect STIR180 Firing Control Radar. I checked P-1 in CMANO couldn't detect K band emissions. SO can you add specs about it for P-1'S "J/HQL-109B" or just add RWR for it?

https://youtu.be/s93-l68D3Eo?t=358

Thanks
Wargame is fun if war is unreal
Rory Noonan
Posts: 2418
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:53 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Rory Noonan »

ORIGINAL: KC45

By the KDX-1 illuminated P-1 incident, P-1 detect STIR180 Firing Control Radar. I checked P-1 in CMANO couldn't detect K band emissions. SO can you add specs about it for P-1'S "J/HQL-109B" or just add RWR for it?

https://youtu.be/s93-l68D3Eo?t=358

Thanks

This is getting a bit ridiculous, don't you think?
Image
User avatar
KC45
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:35 pm
Location: JPN

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KC45 »

Yes both ROK that lying, and Japanese politians who is tring this problem bigger.
Wargame is fun if war is unreal
jun5896
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:29 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by jun5896 »

Please add this loadouts for MiG-35/MiG-35D

A/A : AA-12 Adder B[R-77-1], Heavy(Air Superiority, BVR AAM) : 2 x AA-11 Archer[R-73] 6 x AA-12 Adder B[R-77-1,RVV-SD] 1 x 1500 liter Drop Tank

MiG-29K/KUB can armed above loadouts, MiG-35/D are missed 6 Vympel loadouts.
tiag
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 8:33 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by tiag »

Newest Variant of the S-125 missing in current DB:

S-125-2TM
Sources:
(it seems I cannot post links?!)

Some key info:
- Use missiles 5V27 (all variants)
- Four Missiles per launcher...quad rails as some older SA-3s
- Mobility increased according to Tetraedr: 15-20 minutes deployment after moving
- P-18T Radar as search and acquisition
- Max Engagement Range is 19nm. 5V27DE in the 2M version is 16nm.


Users known: Kazakhstan, Vietnam (list may not be complete).
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1041
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by CV60 »

Minor database correction to DB3000 Weapon_878 SA-20b (48N6M). Janes gives the warhead size as 180kg, vice 150. Also, max target speed is 5442 knots and Range v. ABM is 5-40 km , and 2,000-25,000m altitude (ballistic missile)
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
antonytrentini
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 1:03 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by antonytrentini »

I'd like to request three simple additions to the DB3000 database for a large scenario I am working on:

*A load-out of 24-36 x MALD-J for the 2019 version of the B-1B. Noting the light weight and compact size of the MALD-J, this seems like a reasonable 'what if', especially for those players looking to experiment with the arsenal aircraft concept.

*A sub-launched version of the LRASM that can be launched from any VLS or 533mm TT equipped submarine. Noting the missile can already be launched from surface-ship VLS cells, this also seems like a reasonable 'what if'.

*An Australian version of the EA-18G with NGJ, noting Australia is jointly funding the development with the US. As I'm a new member I can't post links, but googling AIR5349 Phase 6 will show the RAAF's plans for the system, and various trade press publications have carried reporting that show Australia and the US have entered into a cooperative development program for the NGJ.
LORDPrometheus
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:25 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by LORDPrometheus »

So I was looking into missing weapons and realized that the Kh-15/AS-16 "kickback" is not represented properly.

Firstly it is only being carried by the Tu-160 which should be able to hold 12 on its 2 rotary racks. However the weapon is also carried by the Tu-22M with 6 on the internal rotary rack and up to 4 under the wings. The Su-33 and Su-34 are also able to carry the weapon likely 1 centerline or 2 with one under each wing.

There are 3 versions of the missile however only one is in game.

Kh-15 standard nuclear version already in game

The Kh-15S/A anti shipping missile with an active radar seeker and 150kg conventional warhead.

The Kh-15P anti radiation missile variant with a 150kg conventional warhead.

I doubt that the Su-33 and Su-34 carry the nuclear versions.

Beyond the Kh-15 there are a few other weapons I would love to see in game.

3M54AE- air launched Kalibr cruise missile used by Su-35 and probably Tu-142 and Tu-22M

3M54AE1- anti shipping version of above

3M14AE- lighter version for use by MiG-35
AndrewJ
Posts: 2450
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:47 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by AndrewJ »

The Ka-25BSh Hormone A (#2300) has a loadout called VTT-1, RGB-1. However, this loadout does not actually include the RGB-1 sonobuoys. (The three other ASW loadouts do include the sonobuoys.)

Image


Could the loadout be updated to include the sonobuoys? (Or the loadout name changed if the sonobuoys aren't supposed to be there.) These forces are used in Guner98's Mediterranean Fury 1 scenario.
orca
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by orca »

The 35mm Oerlikon Millennium GDM-008 anti-air PH is only 25% when other similar modern CIWS have a much higher PH. Can the PH be increased to make it comparable to other similar systems? Especially given its unique shrapnel projectile method.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinme ... ennium_Gun
https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-s ... 1568291678
User avatar
Pancor
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:00 am
Location: Indonesia

RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information

Post by Pancor »

ORIGINAL: Pancor

Hello

it looks like the F-15S has been reengine apparently in 2008 to F110-GE-129C
source
http://www.geaviation.com/press/militar ... 71003.html

and in 2012 it was upgrade again by BAE system it include AN/ALQ-239 Digital Electronic Warfare Systems (DEWS)/AN/AAR-57 Common Missile Warning Systems (CMWS)
source
http://www.airforce-technology.com/news ... -programme

+

The DEWS For the F-15SA is the AN/ALQ-239 while the CMWS for the same aircraft is the AN/AAR-57
source
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... DNXurtcVnA

Thanks

bump...
Tiramisu
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2018 8:57 pm

RE: Russian hypo weapons and renewal information

Post by Tiramisu »

I belief there is a wrong information of the #2100 - AA-2b Atoll [R-3R]. In the sensors-table the DB is saying it has Semi-Active Radar Homing (SARH), but I think the R-3R should be an infrared missile.
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”