The game needs a 1940 and a 1941 scenario

Moderator: Hubert Cater

Post Reply
User avatar
Steely Glint
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:36 pm

The game needs a 1940 and a 1941 scenario

Post by Steely Glint »

When you want a long campaign, only being able to choose between a 1939 start and a 1942 start is simply not enough choices.
“It was a war of snap judgments and binary results—shoot or don’t, live or die.“

Wargamer since 1967. Matrix customer since 2003.
Top
petrosian
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:58 pm

RE: The game needs a 1940 and a 1941 scenario

Post by petrosian »

I agree it is boring taking Poland then spending turns just moving to France. Also a Pearl Harbor start.
Top
User avatar
Steely Glint
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:36 pm

RE: The game needs a 1940 and a 1941 scenario

Post by Steely Glint »

Exactly. A 1941 Pearl Harbor start scenario and a 1940 Fall of France start scenario.
“It was a war of snap judgments and binary results—shoot or don’t, live or die.“

Wargamer since 1967. Matrix customer since 2003.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII: World at War”