BB-57

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
tanksone
Posts: 390
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:30 am
Location: St Paul, Mn.

BB-57

Post by tanksone »

Hi, can't remember if this has been posted already. Found it on another site and is a pretty good read.
https://www.history.navy.mil/content/hi ... tx3cT3J-Pg

spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: BB-57

Post by spence »

I know this has been posted before but here is the official USN report of the damage to HIJMS Kirishima inflicted by USS Washington. Just thought it might be neat to have both damage reports in the same thread for comparison.

http://www.navweaps.com/index_lundgren/ ... alysis.pdf
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: BB-57

Post by Buckrock »

Actually it's not some official USN report on the Kirishima. It's an essay by the author Robert Lundgren primarily making the arguement that a sketch by the Kirishima's Chief DCO of hit locations from USS Washingtons 16" shells is a better guide to what may have happened to the Kirishima than that stated in other Japanese accounts or in the "official" USN account (based mainly on Washington's AAR). If the sketch was correct, it doubles the number of 16" hits received by the Kirishima as recorded in previous accounts.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
User avatar
Elessar2
Posts: 1478
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:35 am

RE: BB-57

Post by Elessar2 »

One thing I've noticed with many of these wreck discoveries is how, shortly after they go under, intact, from sustained flooding damage, one of the magazines then goes off. Yamato & Mushashi being 2 other notable examples.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20686
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: BB-57

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Elessar2

One thing I've noticed with many of these wreck discoveries is how, shortly after they go under, intact, from sustained flooding damage, one of the magazines then goes off. Yamato & Mushashi being 2 other notable examples.
And HMS Barham ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdrISbwy_zI
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Denniss
Posts: 9313
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Hannover (region)

RE: BB-57

Post by Denniss »

this may happen if you did not flood your magazines. In case of flooding damage you don't think of adding more water to the ship, causing even more instability.
A different example is Bismarck, although it had not used much of its ammo nothing exploded due to being scuttled with water flooding into everything inside the hull. Magazines were very likely flooded first, being prepared for emergency flooding.
WitE dev team - (aircraft data)
WitE 1.08+ dev team (data/scenario maintainer)
WitW dev team (aircraft data, partial data/scenario maintainer)
WitE2 dev team (aircraft data)
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”