ORIGINAL: rico21
An AAR is not a report of competition, score or merit.
[&o] I look forward to the Party's directives about what can be told in a AAR
ORIGINAL: rico21
Because in this case it incites cheating, for example by disabling the OBA or by studying in the editor the opposing device.
Only a very inexperienced player would like to resort to such means to achieve an almost endless string of Major Victories.
ORIGINAL: rico21
An AAR must transport you into the scenario, you revive the torment of poor guys and heroes, often the same, who fought hard at that time.
A successful AAR makes you want to play the scenario and more, buy the game!
It's difficult to revive the torments of who fought hard when one side does not fight at all and the battles look like leaving a bunch of SS-Einsatzgruppen loose at a hippy festival.
I'll amend the AAR of Bastogne according to the Party Lines! [&o]





My first Oscarico...[:D]






who masters blitzkrieg perfectly and who knows that nothing can resist an armored assault. If his last tank burns on the plain, he will pretend that the odds were against him.
who masters urban assaults and close combat and knows how to manage the morale of his troops perfectly. If his last men die under machine gun bullets, he will say that he prefers the scenarios on Stalingrad anyway.
is careful, he knows that the gunner and the assaulter will fail on the first attempt and prefers to bypass the main enemy defenses. If he does not have enough time to take the objectives, he will tell us that the scenario is impossible.

