USSR. Eastern Europe. Rail.
Another blue factory is dismantled and railed to the east.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets














ORIGINAL: rkr1958
Turn 12. Jul/Aug 1941. Allied #8.
USSR. Eastern Europe. The Red Army is getting a bit thin, especially in the Ukraine.
![]()
The communist Sian MIL? If so, it was unable to retreat due to ZOC locks. The communist had to make a decision to either leave that MIL to its fate or risk another unit or two trying to getting it safely retreated.ORIGINAL: Courtenay
Why the Chinese left the MIL behind in the mountains, where it will eventually be destroyed?
As Centuur points out below, there were only two Soviet units that could have attacked. Honestly as the Germans, I would have welcomed this attack this late in the turn. But I'll defer to you and the more experience players as this wasn't a wise move.ORIGINAL: brian brian
The Red Army should have totally pounced on the Rundstedt HQ right there. The Germans could call Blitz to help it survive, but it would at least flip on a retreat. Many ‘failed’ assault attack rolls (high attacker casualties) would still take the HQ with them. The Germans could have lost the logistical center of an entire prong of their advance - a priceless victory for the Russians, worth losing Pskov and the Estonian border easily.
The Finns blocked Zhukov from using the O-chit on such an attack, but that would have been even better.
Again, I'll defer to you and the more experience players on avoiding this risk in the future.ORIGINAL: Centuur
There were only two units available for an attack on von Rundstedt. The units in Pskov are both disorganised. That would mean an attack of +3 maximum. Not a very good chance of getting a result against the HQ. Having said that, it still is not a smart thing to have an HQ sitting in a hex alone within range of enemy land units. Because if I would get a +6 or more against an HQ sitting alone in a hex, I would attack regardless of possible losses...
Yes they are and against an equally skilled player nevertheless. I'm not sure which troops are "doing nothing"? The Red army, especially in the south, is retreating east as fast as possible.ORIGINAL: Centuur
But, to be honest, I think the USSR is doing a poor job in this game on defense too. It's poor play to allow a breakthrough into a city hex like Kiev, especially with troops sitting next to that hex doing nothing...
No doubt about that ... but for now I'm afraid it's solo.ORIGINAL: Centuur
I think that Ronnie needs more games against human opponents...
The Soviets have 2 corps/armies and 1 division in Persia and 9 corps/armies and 1 division in Asia on the border with Manchuria, maintain the peace with Japan. These number of units were needed two turns ago when the Japanese were getting close to being able to break the pact. However, since then with the Soviets transferring a 5-chit from the Nazi-Soviet pact just before Hitler broke it and then adding two draws (1 & 2-chits) the Japanese-Soviet non-aggression pact is "overly" secure. So much so that the Soviets now want to transfer some of these 10 units to the West to help out against Hitler. However, the problem now is rail capacity, which the Soviets need 2 of 3 moves per turn to rail a blue factory to safety.ORIGINAL: composer99
Where is the Red Army? Even with USSR's anemic production, it seems like it should have had more units than this, especially since Germany didn't even go to war until July/August. I guess I should go back through the last few pages of the AAR.
But giving Germany the ability to breakthrough into Kiev and across the river (instead of forcing them to attack Kiev and the river) were definitely mis-steps by the USSR.
However, with the British possibly able to land in Italy itself this game year and China's army looking really big (even if it's all spread out), I think the Allies are still in this game.