Rookie III

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: Rookie III

Post by Buckrock »

ORIGINAL: Leandros
No, I am not. The essence of my posting should be that the reliability of USN torpedoes in the game is, in general, portrayed as even
worse than in RL - even with "reliable USN" torpedoes ON. Which is why using the "reliable USN" torpedoes - ON should
be perfectly viable. I am not complaining on the game - only stating what i have experienced.
Sorry Leandros, I'm still no wiser from the above as to what your expected RL torpedo hit&detonate rate is that the game is failing to achieve, even when
"Reliable USN torpedoes" is "ON"? If it's not the 50% I asked earlier, what is it?
Where exactly is the information you mentioned by Lockwood? What book of his was it in and what page number?

I shall try to look it up - it was only a few weeks ago I leafed through it, as much as one can "leaf" a Kindle book..[;)]..

Fred
And perhaps the volume and page reference for the leaking torpedoes story in Morison?

Thanks.

This was the only sig line I could think of.
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: Rookie III

Post by Buckrock »

Anything further on these interesting claims from Lockwood and Morison? I have most of Morison's volumes gathering dust and might be able to get hold of Lockwood, so if you can
throw a few page numbers (or ebook locations) my way it'd be helpful in sating my curiosity on the torpedo topic.

Thanks.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”