British Destroyers

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

British Destroyers

Post by Lowpe »

British Destroyers

scenario 1...

Grenville is a T class and violates the normal British naming convention.



Image
Attachments
zzzz.jpg
zzzz.jpg (485.19 KiB) Viewed 227 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: British Destroyers

Post by Lowpe »

British Destroyers run the gamut from very weak to formidable. The N and J class are strong surface fighters...

I will add more here later...
User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: British Destroyers

Post by traskott »

Lots of good AA/ASW platforms. A bit weak in naval combat, but experience is superb.

Main trouble: Way too few to make something interesting till end 1943. If you employ them in escort role, no british TF can be formed without assign US DDs to the British Fleet...
User avatar
AleRonin
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:48 pm

RE: British Destroyers

Post by AleRonin »

Very helpful, thanks!
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: British Destroyers

Post by jdsrae »

Capabilities tend to align with their year of commissioning. The pre war DDs are the weaker ones but they can still keep a subs head down.
Many pre war destroyers upgrade to DE which reflects their real life change in role as the modern destroyers P+ start to arrive.
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: British Destroyers

Post by jdsrae »

Trivia for the day, from Wikipedia:
The Royal Navy's practice had been to name all destroyers of a class with names starting with the class letter, in this "U". However, the Royal Navy had reverted to an earlier practice of naming the flotilla leader after a prominent historical seaman, in this case after Vice Admiral Sir Richard Grenville, an Elizabethan soldier and sailor.
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: British Destroyers

Post by Alikchi2 »

The Tribals are fantastic but you don't get them til late.
Ian R
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: British Destroyers

Post by Ian R »

ORIGINAL: jdsrae

Trivia for the day, from Wikipedia:
The Royal Navy's practice had been to name all destroyers of a class with names starting with the class letter, in this "U". However, the Royal Navy had reverted to an earlier practice of naming the flotilla leader after a prominent historical seaman, in this case after Vice Admiral Sir Richard Grenville, an Elizabethan soldier and sailor.

You sir, are correct. According to Conways, the leaders added bunks (and a command space) for about 40 flotilla staff, and were named for captains who had a "good" death in the Klingon style. There was also a Captain Thomas Grenville, of HMS Defiance , who died at First Cape Finisterre on 3 May 1747, so I guess that one hits two targets.
"I am Alfred"
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”