Bill Brings Banzai

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
This was discussed in a thread not long ago and (IIRC) the conclusion was that the Lima's could rearm the Yamato in DBB scenarios or something along that line, because in stock the capacity of the Lima AE is not enough to reach the official ream level of the Yamato Class BBs. As in so many things for this game: "It depends ..."
Yes, in stock scenarios Limas can rearm Yamatos from dot bases. DBB and other mods dunno, I don't play those
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by jdsrae »

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
This was discussed in a thread not long ago and (IIRC) the conclusion was that the Lima's could rearm the Yamato in DBB scenarios or something along that line, because in stock the capacity of the Lima AE is not enough to reach the official ream level of the Yamato Class BBs. As in so many things for this game: "It depends ..."
Yes, in stock scenarios Limas can rearm Yamatos from dot bases. DBB and other mods dunno, I don't play those

Yamato class has a BFG, and not the Roald Dahl kind

Scenario 1 so mods may vary, but here's my working of IJN ships, main weapons and tenders that can rearm them.
Happy for people to point out any errors, but I don't see an AKE that can rearm Yamato.
Note that there are a few starting AG that can convert to AKE. I plan on doing them to provide a few AKE that can rearm Nagato in forward areas.
That was part of the reason why I don't see a need to convert any Lima to AKE.

Image
Attachments
IJN Tenders.jpg
IJN Tenders.jpg (299.11 KiB) Viewed 184 times
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by BillBrown »

jdsrae, even though I have not commented directly, I am looking at your charts and analyzing the information. Thank you
tarkalak
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:49 am
Location: Bulgaria

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by tarkalak »

There was a tread about rearming the Yamato using several AKEs together. That contradicts the manual but apparently worked.
I do not know what is scarier: that I do understand nothing of this demonic script or that I am starting to see the demons that it evokes.

Me, studying for a PHD entry exam in Applied Mathematics.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16099
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: tarkalak

There was a tread about rearming the Yamato using several AKEs together. That contradicts the manual but apparently worked.

I have rearmed Yamato and Musashi at Etorofu, a level 3 port, in my game with Ted. There were 2 Lima class AKEs there as well as a Naval HQ in range and some naval support in the hex. I was surprised as hell, but it happened. Stock scenario 1.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by jdsrae »

Very interesting. I’m going to have to try it with 3 x Akasi AKE to see if it does the same thing when Yamato arrives!
Only 53 days to go...
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
User avatar
Korvar
Posts: 813
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 4:04 pm

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by Korvar »

Bill,

Has your opponent yet expressed any trepidation about what is going on over here? It's mostly us trying to wrap our heads around the production system, but still... [:D]

Image
tarkalak
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:49 am
Location: Bulgaria

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by tarkalak »

ORIGINAL: Korvar

Bill,

Has your opponent yet expressed any trepidation about what is going on over here? It's mostly us trying to wrap our heads around the production system, but still... [:D]

Image

He had probably read 2-3 Japanese AARs and knows that the first 50 pages are:
1. Pearl Harbor! BANZAI !!! -- one post
and
2. Discussion about just in time manufacturing.
I do not know what is scarier: that I do understand nothing of this demonic script or that I am starting to see the demons that it evokes.

Me, studying for a PHD entry exam in Applied Mathematics.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20421
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by BBfanboy »

jdsrae - you remember the thread much better than I did. The stuff I remembered about being mod/scenario dependent may have been that the compounding or AKE values to rearm ships that the manual says they shouldn't could be a bug that worked into one of the newer mods or scenarios. So maybe it isn't showing up for some people playing scenarios based on the last official patch (11.24). Anyway, thanks for your work on the charts and sorting out issues like this.
I'll go back to my hiding spot now ...



Image
Attachments
behindsofa.gif
behindsofa.gif (7.91 KiB) Viewed 184 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by jdsrae »

BB, I have no memory of the other recent post on AKEs...
But I’m definitely going to check if AKEs can stack to rearm Yamato.
Actually, I’ll test it in the next couple of turns to see if 2x Akasi AKE can rearm a Nagato
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: jdsrae
Actually, I’ll test it in the next couple of turns to see if 2x Akasi AKE can rearm a Nagato
They can't. It's individual AKE capacity that matters. Multiple AKEs are nice to have since BBs eat up a lot of supply and action points when rearming
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16099
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by Mike Solli »

I built 6 Lima AKEs in Ted's game. In Mike's game, it's 20. I'm really tired of moving them around. They never seem to be where I need them when I need them.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by BillBrown »

So far I have built 12 Aden AKE, 4 Akasi AKE and 5 Lima AKE. I will probably build more Akasi AKEs in the next few turns.
As Allies I build all of the AE and AKEs I can.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20421
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: jdsrae
Actually, I’ll test it in the next couple of turns to see if 2x Akasi AKE can rearm a Nagato
They can't. It's individual AKE capacity that matters. Multiple AKEs are nice to have since BBs eat up a lot of supply and action points when rearming
You missed the point of the discussion in a previous thread. The book says an individual AKE capacity is used to determine whether rearm level is reached, and cannot be combined with port capacity. But some players HAVE been able to rearm the Yamato class BBs with AKEs of lower capacity than the book rearm level says.

The explanation the thread settled on is that one of the updates or mods changed something to allow that to happen. Some think it is a bug, compounding of AKE capacities to exceed the rearm level in their total. Some think there was a deliberate exception built into the code to allow the largest Japanese AKE to rearm the Yamato. Somehow it is happening, but not in every scenario or game patch. Thus players are experimenting to find out if it can be done in their game.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by BillBrown »

I am pretty sure BBfanboy is right. An item in one of the patches corrected a bug and introduced another and it never got fixed.
I think I have used Harriman AKEs to rearm Colorado Class BBs and it should not work.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: jdsrae
Actually, I’ll test it in the next couple of turns to see if 2x Akasi AKE can rearm a Nagato
They can't. It's individual AKE capacity that matters. Multiple AKEs are nice to have since BBs eat up a lot of supply and action points when rearming
You missed the point of the discussion in a previous thread. The book says an individual AKE capacity is used to determine whether rearm level is reached, and cannot be combined with port capacity. But some players HAVE been able to rearm the Yamato class BBs with AKEs of lower capacity than the book rearm level says.

The explanation the thread settled on is that one of the updates or mods changed something to allow that to happen. Some think it is a bug, compounding of AKE capacities to exceed the rearm level in their total. Some think there was a deliberate exception built into the code to allow the largest Japanese AKE to rearm the Yamato. Somehow it is happening, but not in every scenario or game patch. Thus players are experimenting to find out if it can be done in their game.

I think it is a bug, and personally don't exploit it to get a more historical use out of the Yamato and her sister. Plus, you generally are better off using her relatively close to big ports anyhow for a variety of reasons.[;)]
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by jdsrae »

... especially to not burn too much fuel.
Combination of the above and the following means I won’t test AKE mechanics any time soon and will just proceed as per the manual:
1. It’s saturday night, nearly Sunday morning and I’ve had a few sparkling hops and barley waters
2. I wasn’t planning on using the big BBs too far from large ports anyway
3. It’s that time of the month in game (April fools day 42, I’ve just lost the amphib bonus) when I do an around the grounds on fuel/oil/resource/supply levels and pilot training, so I have some mouse clicks to do
Enjoy your Saturday northerners!
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: jdsrae
Actually, I’ll test it in the next couple of turns to see if 2x Akasi AKE can rearm a Nagato
They can't. It's individual AKE capacity that matters. Multiple AKEs are nice to have since BBs eat up a lot of supply and action points when rearming
You missed the point of the discussion in a previous thread. The book says an individual AKE capacity is used to determine whether rearm level is reached, and cannot be combined with port capacity. But some players HAVE been able to rearm the Yamato class BBs with AKEs of lower capacity than the book rearm level says.
"Some players"? I think it's not me who missed something. It was me in that previous thread too [:D] i'm using Lima AKEs as Yamato ammo depots since forever
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by BillBrown »

My esteemed opponent has emailed me and it will be tomorrow before he gets the turn back to me. First Allied turn is brutal.
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: Bill Brings Banzai

Post by BillBrown »

Dec 8, 1941

Not a lot happened this turn. It would seem weather kept a lot of aircraft from flying.

At Pearl Harbor I had a second strike set, but only the A6M2 sweeps flew. Probably a good thing.
I shot down a reported 7 x P35A and 3 P-40B and lost 2 A6M2s.
KB is headed West.

Had a bad time over Rangoon, lost a few aircraft, thngs happen.

Manila was not great lost 4 A6M2 for 8 x P-40E
Strikes against Clark Field and Iba did not fly.


I sank 6 xAKs from Hong Kong with a surface fleet.
Also sank 3 PTs.

For now, I have stopped all SST production, and increased the Naval shipyards by 53.
I am still producing the super BBs.
I accelerated two CVs( CV Taiho and CV Shinano )
I need to wait and see how that affects things next turn

I want to reiterate, I really don't fully understand everything about playing Japan. I hope
I am able to give my opponent a good fight, but I doubt it will be a thing of beauty.
I am learning and I suspect my second game in a couple of years or so from now will be better.
I am trying to make small increases in my production, hoping to not crash it.

Next turn I will land at Mersing, Aparri, and Vigan.
BTW, I forgot and left a number of airgoups on the mini CV TFs on training. It did not cost anything
but it could have been a problem.
No major disasters so far.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”