HQs

The sequel of the legendary wargame with a complete graphics and interface overhaul, major new gameplay and design features such as full naval combat modelling, improved supply handling, numerous increases to scenario parameters to better support large scenarios, and integrated PBEM++.
Post Reply
BK6583
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:48 pm

HQs

Post by BK6583 »

Playing Chinese Farm scenario as both sides. What do I do with these HQs? They have some serious combat power yet it seems so gamey to put them in the line (I discovered that they can also actually attack). If I put them directly behind the line in tactical support mode do they really provide any meaningful support? I just can't tell from the combat reports if they did any good.
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42561
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: HQs

Post by larryfulkerson »

ORIGINAL: BK6583
Playing Chinese Farm scenario as both sides. What do I do with these HQs? They have some serious combat power yet it seems so gamey to put them in the line (I discovered that they can also actually attack). If I put them directly behind the line in tactical support mode do they really provide any meaningful support? I just can't tell from the combat reports if they did any good.
Look under the hood and see if there's any arty in the unit and if there is then if it has enough range you can put them behing the lines and they will support the troops. If there's no arty in the unit then it depends on whether the HQ has any support units in it. If there are support units in the unit then I myself wouldn't use the unit in combat because I don't want to expose my support units to danger. They help supply to flow to the units you see. Also, if there are any command groups in the unit I wouldn't use them in combat.

There are some HQ units in my B41 mod that don't have any arty so I edited the scenario to give them some 155mm guns and now they can support the troops.
Naughty Grandma Has the Bank Manager by the Balls… LITERALLY!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBeUBBeqkhI
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5442
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: HQs

Post by Lobster »

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
I don't want to expose my support units to danger.

We all learn at a very early age to not expose those things to danger. [;)]
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
LeeChard
Posts: 1116
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:24 pm
Location: Michigan

RE: HQs

Post by LeeChard »

Lose an HQ and every unit it supports plummets in usefulness. Not worth it.
User avatar
Zovs
Posts: 9195
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:02 pm
Location: United States

RE: HQs

Post by Zovs »

Yes you have to double check the HQ units, in my scenario WIE I purposely set each HQ up with Security (MP, SS Polizei or NKVD) squads, AAA units, Engineering (regular Engineers, RR Engineer, Bridge Engineer) squads, Command and Support Squads (based on mostly Army level numbers) and horse transports or truck (light, medium or heavy trucks) if the HQ in question warranted those systems.

So once the command squads take a beating then the formation will get disorganized (this was my design decision) and if the support squads get reduced then so will supply (again another design decision). The RR conversion rate that is automatically done by the game I deliberately set to 2 hexes for my scenario and then added RR engineers to the HQs but a low enough number that sometimes they can repair a RR in that week and other times not (so multiple HQ's may be needed), but I also added a few (precious you could say) dedicated RR Engineer units to both sides.

So how does this effect my scenario?

First the Polish, French and Russian units have a much lower number of Command Squads (2, 3 and 2, respectively) at the start of the war, and then as time goes on the Russian Army HQ got to 3 and then the Guards are at 4 per HQ, most all the minor countries have 1 command squad while Axis Minor Countries have 2 and IRRC Italy has 3. The CW usually has 5-7 and the US has has 4-7. The Germans mostly have 6-9.

So in this scenario HQ are not meant to be in the front lines fighting, only as an extreme last resort.
Image
Beta Tester for: War in the East 1 & 2, WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific, Valor & Victory, Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm, Computer War In Europe 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator
Tester for WDS games
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5442
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: HQs

Post by Lobster »

Without knowing the actual TOE of an Israeli unit during this period it's hard to say what's going on with some of those HQ units. Looks to me like much of the divisional support was thrown in with them. Even the army HQ is powerful. I'd keep the division and army HQ away from the front lines since they have command units. But even at that they have a boat load of command squads.

It's really strange to see division and army hq as the most powerful units on the map.
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
Post Reply

Return to “The Operational Art of War IV”