This was...

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18016
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: And this one:

Post by RangerJoe »

That is what I am using, 9 Kates with 13 bomb hits on an already damaged CL Columbo. [:D]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: And this one:

Post by Dili »

ORIGINAL: johnbmac

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

The point Dili and I are making here is that Torpedo bombers have always had a greater level of accuracy when level bombing than the pilots level bombing skills would justify. It an apparent game design flaw that has been present from the beginning.
Does that include Kate's?

Yes, every aircraft classified as torpedo bomber.
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: And this one:

Post by Dili »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

That is what I am using, 9 Kates with 13 bomb hits on an already damaged CL Columbo. [:D]


You would not be able to put 9 fish in her.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18016
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: And this one:

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Dili

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

That is what I am using, 9 Kates with 13 bomb hits on an already damaged CL Columbo. [:D]


You would not be able to put 9 fish in her.

I did not state fish or torpedoes, I stated bombs. More precisely, 250 kg bombs. One torpedo weighs a lot more than 500 kg, if I remember correctly.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: And this one:

Post by Dili »

I was just implying that those 9 torpedo bombers would have much less chance to hit with torpedoes...
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18016
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: And this one:

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Dili

I was just implying that those 9 torpedo bombers would have much less chance to hit with torpedoes...

That is one reason why I use bombs. There is a limited supply of torpedoes and against these targets, bombs are good enough.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7456
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: And this one:

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Dili

I was just implying that those 9 torpedo bombers would have much less chance to hit with torpedoes...

That is one reason why I use bombs. There is a limited supply of torpedoes and against these targets, bombs are good enough.


I bow to the master of the non sequitur. [&o][&o][&o]

Hans

User avatar
Bif1961
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:52 pm
Location: Phenix City, Alabama

RE: And this one:

Post by Bif1961 »

If you have never played the Japanese before against the AI or human, it is death by 10,000 clicks to start and run the economy. I have played as the Japanese, possibly a dozen times, and it is a challenge to run and not ruin the economy. It is a critical inside the conflict
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”