Eastern front strength

Gary Grigsby’s War in the West 1943-45 is the most ambitious and detailed computer wargame on the Western Front of World War II ever made. Starting with the Summer 1943 invasions of Sicily and Italy and proceeding through the invasions of France and the drive into Germany, War in the West brings you all the Allied campaigns in Western Europe and the capability to re-fight the Western Front according to your plan.

Moderators: Joel Billings, RedLancer

Post Reply
User avatar
von Runstedt
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:34 pm

Eastern front strength

Post by von Runstedt »

So in my current campaign I'm playing with the eastern front box and I'm trying to play with the eastern front as the priority and send any forces I dont need there while also bringing units west to have them refit at the supply sources. The result is that over the winter of 43-44 the eastern front has been well above the stable threshold. (i.e. like 5500-5900). However, despite being stable, the stability seems to lead to the soviet potential building up to ridiculously high levels, (i.e. in the 30-40 range) and staying higher with the result that when the soviets stop building up and actually attack, the attack hits really hard and often sees a lot of unfit units. With this in mind, is it still better overall to have the front be stable? or is it actually better to not have it be stable?
Liam Bobyak
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33784
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

RE: Eastern front strength

Post by Joel Billings »

It should help you in the long run, but there is some randomness. I'd be surprised if anyone has a lot of experience with trying different tactics in the EF box, but would be interesting to hear.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the West”