Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

[stilesw]

Australian Thales Hawkei light mobility vehicle

Logged for future inclusion in future DB release.

-WS

[goodwoodrw]

Thanks That will good for a future Indonesia Vs Australia scenario around 2023.

[Mgellis]

I would like to put out a semi-serious request for the addition of a few "out there" speculative platforms. Basically, I'm hoping to see a few things that would give more creative scenario designers a little more to play with.

I know that many people would be horrified if you actually did this, but I suspect if you added mecha, flying saucers, and sea monsters to the database, you would double sales for CMO. [:)]

[Fido81]

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

I know that many people would be horrified if you actually did this, but I suspect if you added mecha, flying saucers, and sea monsters to the database, you would double sales for CMO. [:)]

Anything is a UFO if you (or your units) are bad enough at identifying aircraft!

[Parel803]

Found it, thank you

[Parel803]

HNLMS Rotterdam had a refit. Images shows a new radar on the formast. Most likely the Thales NS100. Cannot post links. sources are thales, marinenieuws and her own sites.

with regards

[LORDPrometheus]

Morning Wayne, I've got a new proposal for today well actually 3.

So the Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers as built are not the initial nor final form of the design and I am proposing 2 hypothetical versions..

Version one is for a French QEC. The initial plan for the ships was for France for build one and the UK to build 2 but the French dropped out. This hypothetical unit is just the same ship more or less flying a French flag with one key difference. The French version would be CATOBAR instead of SVTOL. The ships are built for but not with CATOBAR systems and are designed to be modifyable at a later date into full CATOBAR ships. A French QEC would be CATOBAR from the start to fly the Rafael.

That's version 1,version 2 is the CATOBAR version of the British QEC able to operate the F-35C which would also be a hypothetical unit for the UK had they gone with this route or if they go with it in the future.

Should not be a hard one to do cheers!

[stilesw]

Morning Wayne, I've got a new proposal for today well actually 3.

Ryan,

I'll put this in the "Ideas that might happen" folder. I'm not saying that it cannot be done but it will be a very low priority. Also, any more detailed information that you could gather would increase the probability of hypothetical unit inclusion. Were there ever any actual discussions or related documentation for these units?

-Wayne

[FoxZz]

ORIGINAL: stilesw

Morning Wayne, I've got a new proposal for today well actually 3.

Ryan,

I'll put this in the "Ideas that might happen" folder. I'm not saying that it cannot be done but it will be a very low priority. Also, any more detailed information that you could gather would increase the probability of hypothetical unit inclusion. Were there ever any actual discussions or related documentation for these units?

-Wayne

The wikipedia article is actually quite furnished : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_ai ... arrier_PA2

https://www.lopinion.fr/blog/secret-def ... itanniques

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vjkoxqt ... IgldLFfGgJ

An article on the British side : http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot ... uture.html

[PN79]

When there is discussion about UFO I would rather get more AA weapons combinations for MiG-23 - see this post: fb.asp?m=4068482

[LORDPrometheus]

Thanks for the assist I was swamped yesterday and forgot to get the data when I went home

[orca]

Any chance on adding a carrier capable Su-57 as a hypothetical unit? This is unlikely to ever be actually deployed but there have been some speculative and likely unreasonable articles on this. I completely understand if you don’t add it and it’s definitely not on the higher end of the priority ranking you’ve talked about. But it would be fun for scenario designers so please consider at some point especially if it’s an easy addition because it’s a copy of an existing unit but with the carrier capable flag.

[SeaQueen]

Commercial KDC-10 and KC-707 tanker.

The US Navy and Marine Corps supplements its tanker fleet with aircraft from Omega Refueling, a private military contractor. They also provide rent-a-tankers for nations all over the world. Might add some flavor to the database.

http://www.omegaairrefueling.com/

[ParachuteProne]

ORIGINAL: Fido81

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

I know that many people would be horrified if you actually did this, but I suspect if you added mecha, flying saucers, and sea monsters to the database, you would double sales for CMO. [:)]

Anything is a UFO if you (or your units) are bad enough at identifying aircraft!

Well UFO's would be cool since US Govt has acknowledged they exist now. But how would you use them in a game environment ?
You could make them instantly goto 5000 ish knots in any direction but there is no known weapon data really . Its said they can disable systems but generally they just fly off. SO what would a scenario look like in game ?
Not trying to dump on the idea because it would be interesting but how ?

[stilesw]

Commercial KDC-10 and KC-707 tanker.

Sarah,

Logged.

-Wayne

[stilesw]

Any chance on adding a carrier capable Su-57 as a hypothetical unit?

Filed in the "Maybe in future" folder.

-WS

[Venom63]

I just realize that all the MAcchi MB 339 for the Italian air force are missing.
107 MB 339 A was bought for trainer and for PAN (Acrobatic team Frecce tricolori)
they can be armed with free fall bomb and gun pod.
aeronautica.difesa.it/mezzi/mlinea/Pagine/MB339AMLU
there are also 30 MB 339 CD update version digital copckit and in flight refulling probe, used also for slow mouver intercep, as per AMI page AIM 9l equipped
aeronautica.difesa.it/mezzi/mlinea/Pagine/MB-339CD

[Venom63]

test all I write I got the error for not post link after seven days of..

[Venom63]

Italy bought 8 mq 1c predator a in 2001
2 lost and 6 update at predator a+

[Venom63]

date of update was 2010