Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

Playing as Japan using Update v1.01.26a. It's April 1943.

Shwebo was occupied by an Allied battalion. I did an airborne assault with supporting aircraft from 4 different bases, all of which had non-storm weather conditions. All unit morale was high.

The drop went off as ordered, but none of the supporting air missions ran. Absent the 2 squadrons of bombers I had assigned, the target was not softened up and the attack failed at 1:1 odds.

The following turn I dropped the remainder of the unit, again assigning air units to support. Again, no support. The remainder of the unit dropped, but the Allies also airlifted reinforcements into the city. Oddly, there was no Allied air support either, though I was expecting some.

It seems to be a bug. The weather in the target hex was fine, else how could the airdrop occur?
Know the enemy and yourself...
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by btd64 »

Post a screenshot of the air units involved....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by btd64 »

And the base....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

Here are the aircraft at the base that were assigned to run the mission the day after the mission.

The base has more than 20,000 supply and has plenty of air support crews. The two bomber units were assigned to attack at 3,000 feet. They have good and aggressive leaders. Their morale was fine.

Image
Attachments
Slide3.jpg
Slide3.jpg (164.9 KiB) Viewed 384 times
Know the enemy and yourself...
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

Here's a shot of one of three supporting Tojo air sweeps over Shwebo, showing that the conditions are heavy cloud. This was the turn of the air drop.

Image
Attachments
Slide1.jpg
Slide1.jpg (107.48 KiB) Viewed 384 times
Know the enemy and yourself...
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

Here's the battle at Shwebo that likely would have been successful if one of the two assigned bomber units performed their mission. The same thing happened the following turn with the weather over Shwebo being clear skies and the transport mission running successfully. In that turn, none of the supporting air missions from 4 different bases ran. Of note, neither did the Allies' run, except for their air drop (I don't know if they assigned any, but I expected a heavy response).

Image
Attachments
Slide2.jpg
Slide2.jpg (163.7 KiB) Viewed 384 times
Know the enemy and yourself...
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

Further, they are assigned to the 22nd Air Flotilla which is in Rangoon.
Know the enemy and yourself...
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: s2tanker

Here are the aircraft at the base that were assigned to run the mission the day after the mission.

The base has more than 20,000 supply and has plenty of air support crews. The two bomber units were assigned to attack at 3,000 feet. They have good and aggressive leaders. Their morale was fine.

Image

Not a single unit tasked to escort.

Since when do you expect bomber units to fly into enemy CAP without escorts. You want to get the benefit of sweeping, suffer the consequences.

Alfred
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

It was a surprise attack. No enemy aircraft were patrolling the area. 7 squadrons were assigned to sweep. I recall 3 of those that swept.
Know the enemy and yourself...
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by btd64 »

Heavy clouds could be the problem....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by btd64 »

What is the range settings for the aircraft?....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

The Helens were assigned to Shwebo, range of 9, assigned a range of 9.
Know the enemy and yourself...
User avatar
s2tanker
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by s2tanker »

Perhaps, though the following turn, the skies over Shwebo were clear and no bombing missions were run then either.
Know the enemy and yourself...
User avatar
Kull
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: El Paso, TX

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by Kull »

I pulled up one of my v1.8.11.26b AI-AI test games (Andy's new Scen 1) and set a 3/5/42 turn as Japan human. Opening the game, there was a single Betty unit in range of Shwebo (based at Tavoy). I then moved a Sally unit to Moulmein and another Betty to Rahang, and set each to bomb Shwebo Ground units at 7K and 3K respectively. All were unescorted. Ran the turn and all except the Rahang Betty made their assaults (see attachment) despite "Heavy Cloud" and no intel of any kind on the target (didn't even know if there was a ground unit there). Turns out Rahang had very little supply (yellow exclamation), so that's probably the reason that Betty did not participate.

Anyway, Shwebo is not "bugged" against Ground air assaults. What you saw is either random or the bomber units were making decisions based on some other factors.

Image
Attachments
Shwebobombingtest.jpg
Shwebobombingtest.jpg (50.11 KiB) Viewed 384 times
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by Lokasenna »

The bombers didn't fly because:

1) Suspected or detected enemy CAP or LRCAP (including "leaky" CAP/LRCAP)

2) Lack of Escorts. Not Sweeps - Escorts. You need Escort mission to go with the bombers into contested airspace, else the bombers have a high likelihood not to fly (except against CVs and BBs)
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Is there an issue with Shwebo and air strikes?

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: s2tanker

It was a surprise attack. No enemy aircraft were patrolling the area. 7 squadrons were assigned to sweep. I recall 3 of those that swept.

If you were confident there were no enemy fighters patrolling that hex, then you didn't need any sweeps and every last aircraft assigned to sweep was wasted.

If you suspected there might be CAP or LRCAP then escorting your bombers would have been the best way to maximize the chances for a bomber sortie.

ONLY if you suspect such heavy CAP that your escorting fighters will be chewed up is a sweep warranted.

You wasted your fighters on an apparently useless mission and why on earth would you sweep at 9k feet sacrificing any altitude bonus to the prospective enemy?

I also don't believe you could have counted on a bombing mission turning the tide of the land battle. Maybe yes, maybe no.
Hans

Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”