CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

Ian R
Posts: 3442
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by Ian R »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Ian R

I am waiting for feedback on what they think the correct treatment of the Northern Ireland territorial is.
warspite1

Apologies if I have the wrong end of the stick here, but why should there be any query about a Northern Irish Territorial? The province (not a WIF term) is an integral part of the United Kingdom CW Home Country and I assume there is no different treatment for that unit than there would be, for example, the Glasgow MIL.

There is a difference of opinion on the topic... FE and CE have different treatments as well.

One view is that NI is part of the UK and therefore it is a CW home country unit.

The other is that if the "territory" comes under US control, the unit either:

(a) goes in the US force pool (FE)

or

(b) is removed from the game because there is no counterpart in US colours (CE treatment).

In MWIF, NI is identified as a "sub-country" in the list on about page II-200 of the player's manual. I suspect this means it will co-operate with the US as currently coded.
"I am Alfred"
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9089
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by Centuur »

ORIGINAL: Ian R

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

If you think there is a bug -- and the New Caledonia TERR stacking with the US looks like a bug to me -- post it to the Tech Support forum. If it is not a bug, people will let you know.

I posted a question about this in the WIF forum, and Bill Popovich and others agree with you - the FF New Caledonia territorial is not supposed to co-operate with the US (or the CW).

I am waiting for feedback on what they think the correct treatment of the Northern Ireland territorial is.

Sorry, but I don't think you understand how things are.

MWIF is coded according to RAW 7 together with the FAQ and some additions and changes made to the rules in 2008. Any rule change which happened after that point, has not been coded. So: if a group now says that this isn't according to RAW7, they are simply too late to change MWIF.
Any rule changes and a lot of questions which popped up during coding, have been discussed between ADG, the programmer and the beta test team.

If we now have to start making again changes to the code, because a WIF forum in 2020, which has taken no part into the development of MWIF, says that things have to change, we are going in the wrong direction. Where is that going to end? The rules of the boardgame have been subject for discussion for many, many years. Tomorrow another opinion regarding RAW will come out of the big hat of another forum.

IMHO, this is not the way to go, especially since there are only 3 units involved. Don't waste time on this. There are more pressing issues to solve...

No bug, since the literal text of RAW has been followed and that's how it is...



Peter
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Well in all the games of MWIF I've played the NI TERR has never featured so I've no idea how its working (only how it should) but
ORIGINAL: Centuur

There are more pressing issues to solve...
warspite1

Amen to that.... return to base digression for naval air combat for one.....
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Ian R
Posts: 3442
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by Ian R »

ORIGINAL: Centuur


No bug, since the literal text of RAW has been followed and that's how it is...


I already said above, I agree with you, no bug. No-one is saying "things have to change".




"I am Alfred"
Ian R
Posts: 3442
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by Ian R »

ORIGINAL: warspite1


Well in all the games of MWIF I've played the NI TERR has never featured so I've no idea how its working (only how it should) but


The question I originally asked was:
Are there some geography specific rules in place as to CW & FF territorials co-operating with the US?

The answer is "yes".

CW home country territorials, and CW/FF territorials from a 'sub-country' without a capital do. CW/FF territorials from minor countries with capitals don't. Ulster is a sub-country territory in game terms.




"I am Alfred"
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Ian R

The question I originally asked was:

Are there some geography specific rules in place as to CW & FF territorials co-operating with the US?

The answer is "yes".

CW home country territorials, and CW/FF territorials from a 'sub-country' without a capital do. CW/FF territorials from minor countries with capitals don't. Ulster is a sub-country territory in game terms.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The rule applied to 1939 colony territorials seems to be that a unit from a colonial geographic entity without a capital city, co-operates the same as the units of the MP that controls it.

Examples include the New Caledonia, Northern Ireland, and British Somaliland territorials. They might be the only three units in that category.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am waiting for feedback on what they think the correct treatment of the Northern Ireland territorial is.
warspite1

But sub-country isn't a defined term in RAC. There are only Home Countries and Territories. Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom Home Country (and most definitely not a colony) and so there should be nothing special or different about its TERR to that of any other UK unit.

A home country consists of every hex that a MAR could reach from the capital of that home country without crossing a red political boundary
or entering a hex containing the name of another major power


and

Britain: a.k.a. the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Ian R
Posts: 3442
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by Ian R »

But sub-country isn't a defined term in RAC.

It is a term described in the player's manual Vol II; read from about page 200ff. I agree, though, its characteristics are not fully defined.


"I am Alfred"
User avatar
BrianJH
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 2:22 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by BrianJH »

ORIGINAL: Ian R

But sub-country isn't a defined term in RAC.

It is a term described in the player's manual Vol II; read from about page 200ff. I agree, though, its characteristics are not fully defined.


Check 11.2.2 in Player Manual II. p 198.
Countries are broken into 4 mutually exclusive groups: governed areas, sub-countries, minor countries, and major powers. These roughly match territories, subareas of countries, minor countries, and the major powers in WIF terms. Sub-countries are used for odds and ends: SS units, Nationalist China, Communist China, Eastern Poland, Bessarabia, and so on.

Interesting to note that New Caledonia is categorized a sub-country [ ID 4 ] from the table on page 199. So, I'm presuming that this would make New Caledonia a part of France. This would explain why the USA units are co-operating with the NCA units.

Not sure why this decision was made, in the board game this area is considered a territory, perhaps those who have been around longer can explain.

Brian.






Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: CW/FF territorials - cooperation with US units.

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Ian R

The question I originally asked was:

Are there some geography specific rules in place as to CW & FF territorials co-operating with the US?

The answer is "yes".

CW home country territorials, and CW/FF territorials from a 'sub-country' without a capital do. CW/FF territorials from minor countries with capitals don't. Ulster is a sub-country territory in game terms.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The rule applied to 1939 colony territorials seems to be that a unit from a colonial geographic entity without a capital city, co-operates the same as the units of the MP that controls it.

Examples include the New Caledonia, Northern Ireland, and British Somaliland territorials. They might be the only three units in that category.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am waiting for feedback on what they think the correct treatment of the Northern Ireland territorial is.
warspite1

But sub-country isn't a defined term in RAC. There are only Home Countries and Territories. Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom Home Country (and most definitely not a colony) and so there should be nothing special or different about its TERR to that of any other UK unit.

A home country consists of every hex that a MAR could reach from the capital of that home country without crossing a red political boundary
or entering a hex containing the name of another major power


and

Britain: a.k.a. the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
The US can 'claim' Northern Ireland and make it US controlled. That is why I have marked it as a sub-country. It falls into the same category as Bessarabia and Transylvania, which are groups of hexes that start out as part of one country but can pass over to the control of a different country.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”