How will the base construction be handled in WitP?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25246
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

How will the base construction be handled in WitP?

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,

How will the base construction be handled in WitP?


From history books we all know that really big (and proper) naval bases took
years to make while aviation bases (including large strips for heavy bombers)
took months to construct.

In UV this seemed way way to accelerated...


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

Re: How will the base construction be handled in WitP?

Post by siRkid »

Apollo11 wrote:Hi all,

How will the base construction be handled in WitP?


From history books we all know that really big (and proper) naval bases took
years to make while aviation bases (including large strips for heavy bombers)
took months to construct.

In UV this seemed way way to accelerated...


Leo "Apollo11"
As far as I know nothing has changed as far as base construction goes. However, a lot of things have changes as far as base capabilities. Things like sub re-supply, mine warfare, repair ect..
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25246
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

Thanks for replaying, "Kid"!

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,

First of all thanks for replaying "Kid"!
Kid wrote: As far as I know nothing has changed as far as base construction goes.
OK - but please see below for few more related questions...
However, a lot of things have changes as far as base capabilities. Things
like sub re-supply, mine warfare, repair ect..
RGR.

But what about base size numbers (in UV the biggest base is size 9) and
corresponding capabilities?

I think I saw early Alpha WitP pictures with Pearl Harbour (and perhaps
Singapore) base size larger than 9 (I think they were 11).

Would player be able to build up to base size 9 (just like in UV) and leave
higher base size numbers to larger pre-war effort (i.e. base building effort
that took years like the things actually were for port, let's say, Singapore)?


Also would the base size numbers correspondent (i.e. have the same abilities)
as in UV regarding ship repair for example or we need specialized stuff in
ports as well (like existence of Naval/Merchant repair yard and/or repair
ships)?


Thanks in advance!


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
User avatar
Bulldog61
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Aurora,CO

Re: Thanks for replaying,

Post by Bulldog61 »

Apollo11 wrote:Hi all,

First of all thanks for replaying "Kid"!



OK - but please see below for few more related questions...



RGR.

But what about base size numbers (in UV the biggest base is size 9) and
corresponding capabilities?

I think I saw early Alpha WitP pictures with Pearl Harbour (and perhaps
Singapore) base size larger than 9 (I think they were 11).

Would player be able to build up to base size 9 (just like in UV) and leave
higher base size numbers to larger pre-war effort (i.e. base building effort
that took years like the things actually were for port, let's say, Singapore)?


Also would the base size numbers correspondent (i.e. have the same abilities)
as in UV regarding ship repair for example or we need specialized stuff in
ports as well (like existence of Naval/Merchant repair yard and/or repair
ships)?


Thanks in advance!


Leo "Apollo11"
The largest Base size is a size 10. Don't forget the AR's (Repair ships) that can be stationed at a smaller port to assist with repairs. There are also type tenders AD Destroyer, AS Submarine and AGP PT Boat tenders that If I remember correctly also have some repair enhancement for the appropriate type ships. They also allow torpedo resupplies at a smaller port.
You can run but you'll die tired!
sbond
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2000 8:00 am
Location: USA

Post by sbond »

Small airbase and runway did not take as long to build as many may think.

Take Adak Alaska for example, the US forces landed on Sept. 1 1942, they had a working runway with medium bombers landing by Sept. 12 1942. 11 days in a horrible climate and they were able to have at least a tactical airbase complete and operational. They used steel girders at Adak to lay down the runway, which could be repaired easy and all you needed was a pretty firm and packed level area to lay the mesh down and bingo just add bombers.
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

Yes, they had that mesh material to lay the runway down...I heard they could repair a major bomb hole in 45 minutes with this at Henderson.

All you need is a cleared and leveled area of sufficient size to accomodate fighters and other single engined planes. Bring in some ammo and fuel storage, build a small tower, radar/radio shack, AA guns and barracks, hangars or just camo netting, revetments...this is all stuff that a relatively small engineer unit could put together fairly quickly or build with a bulldozer and locally available materials. I think that Ports should take a lot longer to build than airfields. They require bringing in heavy equipment like cranes and derricks which I imagine take more effort to set up, building piers and whatnot, storehouses...still definitely doable, but I think it would require much more engineering, poured concrete/permanent structures, technicians, laborers, defenses...
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”