Zones of control and unit losses

[Dalwin]

Is there some point at which a corps will stop having a zone of control due to having suffered too many losses or having too low an effectiveness?

[AlvaroSousa]

Nope. But it just means you can blow it up.

[ncc1701e]

Interesting point here. A division with a strength of 10/10 does not exert a ZoC. As such, we can imagine that an infantry corps, that has a strength of 10/20 or 10/30, has lost its ability to exert a ZoC.

[OxfordGuy3]

ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

Interesting point here. A division with a strength of 10/10 does not exert a ZoC. As such, we can imagine that an infantry corps, that has a strength of 10/20 or 10/30, has lost its ability to exert a ZoC.

Not necessarily, a Corps is not just a collection of Divisions, it also has Corps-level support units, such as heavy artillery, extra logistical capability etc. that a division won't have

[AlvaroSousa]

egg-zackley

[ncc1701e]

? [;)]

[Dalwin]

The idea of a unit that is a mere fragment of its usual self having reduced ability to cover a large stretch of the front or to hinder enemy movement is a common theme in many games of this type. The game already does this to some extent by not giving a ZOC to a division. It is not about what components make up the unit, but about how much frontage a unit of a given size and strength could influence.

This is even more significant since enemies seem more than happy to retreat through your zones of control thereby escaping encirclements which seemed solid.