Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
jagsdomain
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 12:11 am

Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by jagsdomain »

With a small complement of planes, only 6 fighter I cannot see using them by them selves. 8linstead I am going to link them up with the E.
Wondered what others do with them?
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by geofflambert »

Whatever you do take the British squadrons off and put US squadrons on. The US carrier planes are way better and the pilot pool way larger.

As for PoW and Repulse, if you save them, they're the only BBs early on that can keep up with the US CVs.

jagsdomain
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 12:11 am

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by jagsdomain »

That's a really good idea of putting us plabes on them.
I was thinking of using it as a giant air transport ship but yiur idea seems very good.
I have some SBD, Vindacators, and Buffalos. That are CV capable I could put them in the ship let it sit and train them up.
I have been tild it takes 3 months to go from capable to working.
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by geofflambert »

That's not exactly correct. Carrier capable squadrons can go into full operations on CVs from the get go. I'm not sure what's gained when the squadron becomes carrier trained, perhaps fewer ops losses, I don't know, but I just don't worry about it.

jagsdomain
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 12:11 am

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by jagsdomain »

OK thanks!
Other question. I have a AP ship I have to get ride of and there is no button to do that.
What am I missing?
User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by geofflambert »

You have to put it in an appropriate port and it will happen automatically. Until you get it to that port you will pay after the required time. Has to be a national port or something. For the US that would be Pearl (I think) or one of the coasts or Panama. For Britain I think your best bet is Capetown.

User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2617
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by CaptBeefheart »

"Carrier trained" is supposed to mean fewer ops losses when operating off a deck. I haven't noticed any effect, but I also haven't paid attention.

On ship withdrawals, I don't think Pearl would work. Sydney, the big West Coast ports and Bombay all seem to work. Someone with a manual can chime in (probably Level 9 or 10 port on an Allied home continent).

Cheers,
CB
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5539
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by Yaab »

Here are my notes (probably a collation of Alfred/michelm info):

On map withdrawal ports are set based on the historical exit locations for ships leaving the Pacific:

1. Any level 9 port.

2. National home ports of the United States, Canada, India, Australia, and New
Zealand (with no port level requirement)

FYI, here are the current national bases {primary, alternate}:
{ BASE_SAN_FRANCISCO, BASE_EASTERN_USA }, // US Navy
{ BASE_SYDNEY, BASE_MELBOURNE }, // Australia
{ BASE_AUCKLAND, BASE_CHRISTCHURCH }, // New Zealand
{ BASE_ADEN, BASE_UNITED_KINGDOM }, // British
{ BASE_UNITED_KINGDOM, 0 }, // French
{ BASE_KARACHI, BASE_ADEN }, // Indian
{ BASE_MOMBASA, BASE_CAPETOWN }, // Commonwealth
{ BASE_VANCOUVER, BASE_CANADA }, // Canada

3. Any level 7 or larger port on the US or Canadian West Coast.

4. Any level 7 or larger Indian port East of Ceylon (including Ceylon itself)

5. Any level 7 or larger port in South Eastern Australia, plus Perth.

6. Any level 7 or larger port in New Zealand.
User avatar
Podolano
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 8:08 pm
Location: Sao Paulo Brazil

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by Podolano »

Hi,

I’ve been using Illustrious, with its small planes capacity, to help repulse a jap invasion in andaman islands in Sep-Oct 42, twice with success. Even with the venerable Swordfish squad.
Ian R
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by Ian R »

ORIGINAL: Yaab

...

4. Any level 7 or larger Indian port East of Ceylon (including Ceylon itself)
...

West?
"I am Alfred"
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5539
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Does anyone use Bristish CV independently?

Post by Yaab »

Good catch.

Probably it is WEST of Ceylon, which would include Bombay and Karachi, provided you build them up.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”