100 relation giving director malus

[Saros]

Game started version 17, run with 1.03 beta9b.

I seem to remember a previous bug where 50 relations caused this as well.

[zgrssd]

In 1.03beta9 I got very wierd relations bonuses:
SCC 65 Rel: +14%
Eco 96 Rel: +50%
Model 95 Rel: +42%
Interior 88 Rel: +29%
SSC 97 Rel: +44%

Something seems a bit off in that formula. As all my >90 Rel leaders and the one above are women, I got a feeling all female leders are Tsunderes [:)]

[Vic]

@Saros,
You sure she didnt get the job just that round?
if not send it over to vic@vrdesigns.net i'll have a look.

@zgr,
I think the relation bonus is taken before any changes takes place in relation score.

best wishes,
Vic

[zgrssd]

ORIGINAL: Vic

@Saros,
You sure she didnt get the job just that round?
if not send it over to vic@vrdesigns.net i'll have a look.

@zgr,
I think the relation bonus is taken before any changes takes place in relation score.

best wishes,
Vic

As I understand:
- percentage is value from start of turn.
- but the picture is a current value, after all decisions (and possibly natural relations).

ORIGINAL: zgrssd

In 1.03beta9 I got very wierd relations bonuses:
SCC 65 Rel: +14%
Eco 96 Rel: +50%
Model 95 Rel: +42%
Interior 88 Rel: +29%
SSC 97 Rel: +44%

Something seems a bit off in that formula. As all my >90 Rel leaders and the one above are women, I got a feeling all female leders are Tsunderes [:)]

Between end turn and decisions I got:
SCC 65: +15%
Eco 94: +50%
Model 95: +45%
Interior 85: +38%
SSC 97: +47%

If I put last turns Relation to this turns bonus:
SSC 65: +14%
Eco 96: +50%
Model 95: +45%
Interior 88: 38%
SSC 97: +47%

I still got 96 giving me more then 97? I think you should mention relations at "point of calculation" in the report. Maybe even that it is a "start of turn" rerport? That would help us figure out where the discrepancy is, if any.