Japanese Type Yu Submarines

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
OPilot
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Location: North Carolina

Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by OPilot »

It looks like the loss of one of these SST's yields 22 victory points. Am I looking at that correctly? That seems high for a small 273 ton displacement ship. It doesn't seem worthwhile to expose it to attack because it can only transport 40 tons of supplies. Am I missing something?
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7401
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Q-Ball »

They don't haul more supplies than a regular submarine, but cost just as much, are slower, and can't serve multi-roles. For these reasons most players choose not to build them.....
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Shellshock »

An "Army" submarine does seem like a contradiction in terms. I think the IJA were out of their depth if Yu know what I mean. [:'(]
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18285
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Shellshock

An "Army" submarine does seem like a contradiction in terms. I think the IJA were out of their depth if Yu know what I mean. [:'(]

The US Army had transport ships in World War II.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: Shellshock

An "Army" submarine does seem like a contradiction in terms. I think the IJA were out of their depth if Yu know what I mean. [:'(]
They were below C level?
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Platoonist »

I read in Submarines of the Imperial Japanese Navy by Norman Polmar that they were constructed by the Japanese Army without any consultation with the Imperial Navy. Sounds like another case of divided effort and research in the Japanese military. It's probably a good thing they didn't need torpedoes. I'd hate to see what inadequate research in that field would look like.

Oh wait. we do know what it looks like....USN torpedoes.
Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

They don't haul more supplies than a regular submarine, but cost just as much, are slower, and can't serve multi-roles. For these reasons most players choose not to build them.....

For that very reason I love them and build them and use them. They are fun. [:D]
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

well, an SSX is 4 points [X(] it seems reasonable that a SST will be ~5 times more

and when you are starving, 40 tons of supply is a lot
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18285
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by RangerJoe »

I think that the SSX is way overpriced.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

yes, specially since some xAKLs, xAPs, SCs and PBs are at 1 point
Cavalry Corp
Posts: 4162
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Cavalry Corp »

Did they only carry 40mt - maybe they should have more. It seems odd JPN would build ships like this if they only carried the same supply as a fully aquipped to fight sub. Shame VP cannot be adjusted in the editor to make them more worthwhile.
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Shellshock »

The sub was only 137 feet long, crudely built with no interior bulkheads, two six cylinder diesel engines and a periscope which operated by counterweights. A top surface speed of eight knots. The scope could only be raised 3 feet. The IJA called them Maru-Yu to help conceal the fact that the Japanese Army was building submarines.

Among the places they were constructed at was a locomotive factory, a gun factory, a boiler factory, none was a proper shipyard.

I don't know of any accidents involving these boats, but I think I would have rather taken my chances in a barge. Apparently a few were hauled to the US Navy Yard at Mare Island for inspection.

Image
Attachments
TypeYUinteriorone.jpg
TypeYUinteriorone.jpg (295.19 KiB) Viewed 342 times
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Shellshock »

Bob Hope at the flood controls folks. Well....he sure looks like Bob Hope anyway.

Image
Attachments
TypeYUinteriortwo.jpg
TypeYUinteriortwo.jpg (305.2 KiB) Viewed 342 times
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Platoonist »

I'd be curious if any Colombian drug cartels have ever looked in on the the plans for these. Updated with a few modern touches like GPS and contemporary diesels and that 40 ton capacity would look pretty good. The semi-submersibles they have running now can only ship ten tons of narcotics. You might even get a few runs out of them, instead of them being one-trip disposable boats.
Image
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

The cartel are probably hiring former Soviet block naval engineers turned Russian mafia to build their submersibles;

it is too risky and not cost effective to run them back, and you don't want them too big as not to put all the eggs in one basket
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Platoonist »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

it is too risky and not cost effective to run them back, and you don't want them too big as not to put all the eggs in one basket

It just staggers me that the economics of drug-smuggling allows you to discard a two million dollar submersible at sea like a used beer can. But, apparently so. [X(]

It seems they can move enough cocaine in a single voyage to generate more than 100 million USD in illicit proceeds for their drug lords.
Image
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18285
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Platoonist
ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

it is too risky and not cost effective to run them back, and you don't want them too big as not to put all the eggs in one basket

It just staggers me that the economics of drug-smuggling allows you to discard a two million dollar submersible at sea like a used beer can. But, apparently so. [X(]

It seems they can move enough cocaine in a single voyage to generate more than 100 million USD in illicit proceeds for their drug lords.

I think that small depth charges would work or even mini homing torpedoes.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7401
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Q-Ball »

ORIGINAL: Shellshock

Bob Hope at the flood controls folks. Well....he sure looks like Bob Hope anyway.

Image

Great photos, thanks for posting these!

What hunk of junk
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 31161
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Platoonist
ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

it is too risky and not cost effective to run them back, and you don't want them too big as not to put all the eggs in one basket

It just staggers me that the economics of drug-smuggling allows you to discard a two million dollar submersible at sea like a used beer can. But, apparently so. [X(]

It seems they can move enough cocaine in a single voyage to generate more than 100 million USD in illicit proceeds for their drug lords.

I think that small depth charges would work or even mini homing torpedoes.
A boat with a sonar and a guy dropping hand grenades would work.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18285
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Japanese Type Yu Submarines

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Orm
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Platoonist



It just staggers me that the economics of drug-smuggling allows you to discard a two million dollar submersible at sea like a used beer can. But, apparently so. [X(]

It seems they can move enough cocaine in a single voyage to generate more than 100 million USD in illicit proceeds for their drug lords.

I think that small depth charges would work or even mini homing torpedoes.
A boat with a sonar and a guy dropping hand grenades would work.

Ah yes, hand grenades. Someone I knew said that they were good for fishing . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”