OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
tolsdorff
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:38 am

OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by tolsdorff »

I find, all things regarding the US Navy interesting, and how they plan on keeping the edge on the rest of the world. but thisCFR would be astonishing, even for the US armed forces. I do not know of any reliable sources.
But I highly regard the knowledge of most people here, it far surpasses most.

Wondering if this is real? It would give an edge to the navy for the next 100 years i guess
Nou nou, gaat het wel helemaal lekker met je -- Kenny Sulletje
The broken record - Chris
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: tolsdorff

I find, all things regarding the US Navy interesting, and how they plan on keeping the edge on the rest of the world. but thisCFR would be astonishing, even for the US armed forces. I do not know of any reliable sources.
But I highly regard the knowledge of most people here, it far surpasses most.

Wondering if this is real? It would give an edge to the navy for the next 100 years i guess
Aren't all current reactors based on fission? Fusion requires the introduction of Hydrogen which makes a much harder to control reaction. I would expect such a breakthrough to be headline news throughout the world because it would provide a way to get small power plants all over the place. If it is a secret, it should never have been featured in an article in a business magazine. IOW, I have my doubts.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Ian R
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by Ian R »

If those could be built at reasonable cost (and were safe), I suspect GE or one of the big German or Japanese energy plant companies would be bringing them to market, covid notwithstanding.

Ergo, it isn't safe (yet) or is unable to be built at reasonable cost.
"I am Alfred"
User avatar
StasSche
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 11:55 am

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by StasSche »

The fact of granting a patent proves only the uniqueness of the idea.

The patent claim review doesn't involve any feasibility and/or economical study of the invention.

Only 5% of granted patents are commercialized (and not all of them are successful at the end).

Therefore for now it is just an idea, waiting for implementation. There is quite a number of physicist who believe that the a stable nuclear fusion reaction in not possible in the nearest 150 years, and most likely the reaction can be implemented in space only.
"How do you want me to feed the army in the lands that you forbid me from pillaging?"
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by Lokasenna »

To my knowledge, practically speaking all viable fusion reactors right now are endothermic - meaning they require more energy input than you are able to harvest from them. They do not meet the Lawson criterion (yet).
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19375
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

To my knowledge, practically speaking all viable fusion reactors right now are endothermic - meaning they require more energy input than you are able to harvest from them. They do not meet the Lawson criterion (yet).

Except for the big ones in the sky, that is true.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5542
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by Yaab »


Isnt't this CFR an iteration of ITER?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by geofflambert »

The Navy doesn't get patents for secrets, they'd rather keep them secret.

User avatar
geofflambert
Posts: 14887
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:18 pm
Location: St. Louis

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by geofflambert »

ORIGINAL: StasSche

The fact of granting a patent proves only the uniqueness of the idea.

The patent claim review doesn't involve any feasibility and/or economical study of the invention.

Only 5% of granted patents are commercialized (and not all of them are successful at the end).

Therefore for now it is just an idea, waiting for implementation. There is quite a number of physicist who believe that the a stable nuclear fusion reaction in not possible in the nearest 150 years, and most likely the reaction can be implemented in space only.

So why didn't the "Space Force" get the patent instead of the Navy?

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

ORIGINAL: StasSche

The fact of granting a patent proves only the uniqueness of the idea.

The patent claim review doesn't involve any feasibility and/or economical study of the invention.

Only 5% of granted patents are commercialized (and not all of them are successful at the end).

Therefore for now it is just an idea, waiting for implementation. There is quite a number of physicist who believe that the a stable nuclear fusion reaction in not possible in the nearest 150 years, and most likely the reaction can be implemented in space only.

So why didn't the "Space Force" get the patent instead of the Navy?
They were too spaced out to think about it. Maybe they are trying to implement that new fantastic nuclear weapon that was recently blabbed by someone in the administration.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by Zorch »

I know just the person to run it.

Image
Attachments
homersafetymanual.jpg
homersafetymanual.jpg (180.12 KiB) Viewed 291 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20578
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Post by BBfanboy »

.

Image
Attachments
HomerRadioactive.jpg
HomerRadioactive.jpg (7.25 KiB) Viewed 291 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”