IJ commander resurrected - Mundy (A) vs. Castor Troy (IJ) - restricted AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 25, 43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Tsu at 107,65

Japanese Ships
DD Nagatsuki
DD Kikuzuki
DD Fumizuki

Allied Ships
SS Cod

SS Cod is sighted by escort
DD Nagatsuki fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Kikuzuki fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Fumizuki attacking submerged sub ....
DD Kikuzuki fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Fumizuki fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


Only the usual ASW action but Imperial Japanese aircraft engineers report a breakthrough on an advanced IJNAF carrier based fighter, the SAM. The first R&D factory is fully repaired, the fighter is expected to enter production in mid 44 as soon as the engines are available.

Image
Attachments
2.jpg
2.jpg (290.19 KiB) Viewed 737 times
User avatar
Bif1961
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:52 pm
Location: Phenix City, Alabama

RE: AAR 1943

Post by Bif1961 »

Christmas 1943 [:-] and you never said a word.
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Christmas 1943 [:-] and you never said a word.

Have completely missed that! [:D]
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 31, 43

End of 1943 and here are the frontlines. The year saw Allied attempts on the offensive with a major operation against the Marshalls that was repulsed bloodily. Therefore the Empire still holds a defensive perimeter the real life Japanese could have dreamt of.

1944 is going to be the turning year though, I expect the next major Allied operation sometime after April when carrier strenght increased. Most likely targets is the SRA with the Dutch East Indies focussed or the Pacific again. The Allied have massed troops on Ceylon, North Eastern Australia and most likely Hawaii. The attack and reconquest of India has begun some time ago at Cochin but there has been no development in the Port Moresby area.

Image
Attachments
4.jpg
4.jpg (254.68 KiB) Viewed 737 times
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 02, 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Nagasaki/Sasebo at 101,59

Japanese Ships
AM Wa 105
AM Wa 106

Allied Ships
SS Harder

SS Harder launches 2 torpedoes at AM Wa 105
Harder diving deep ....
AM Wa 106 attacking submerged sub ....
AM Wa 105 fails to find sub, continues to search...
AM Wa 106 fails to find sub, continues to search...
AM Wa 105 fails to find sub, continues to search...
AM Wa 106 fails to find sub, continues to search...
AM Wa 105 fails to find sub, continues to search...
AM Wa 106 fails to find sub and abandons search
AM Wa 105 fails to find sub, continues to search...
AM Wa 105 attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Wotje at 135,115 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

368 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
CL Biloxi, Shell hits 2
DD Allen
DD Carmick, Shell hits 2
DD Baldwin
DD Harding
DD Satterlee
DD Grayson
DD Meredith
DD Abner Read
DD Picking
DD Luce
DD Lewis Hancock
DD Halford
DD Hailey
DD Franks
DD Erben
DD Dortch
DD Caperton

Japanese ground losses:
50 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 2
Runway hits 5
Port hits 1


we have spotted and attacked this rather strange task force yesterday, some 100+ Helen IIb attacked at 2000ft dropping 400x250 kg bombs (!!) for exactly 0 (ZERO) hits on the ships in good weather... nav skill of all crews is 70, exp 50... again tells me there has to be some sort of penalty for using IJAAF bombers on nav attack, as the same number of Kates dropping only halve the number of bombs would annihilate halve of the task force... no hits at all is quite a joke but I guess a complaint wouldn't be welcome as usual, ships ruled everything at that time and aircraft were useless... or how exactly was that?

as a sidenote, we lost 29 bombers including 22 crews to flak and ops in the attacks...[8|]

CL Biloxi and no less than 17 destroyers bombarded the base this turn and the Naval Fortress was replying but only achieved four hits into the superstructure of two ships... no clue at all what Mundy is planning here, haven't spotted any other task forces in the area and there is a lot of search in the air...


Wotje Naval Fortress firing at CL Biloxi
CL Biloxi firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Allen
DD Allen firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Carmick
DD Carmick firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Baldwin
DD Baldwin firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Harding
DD Harding firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
DD Satterlee firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Satterlee
DD Grayson firing at Wotje
DD Meredith firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Meredith
DD Abner Read firing at Wotje
DD Picking firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Picking
DD Luce firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Luce
DD Lewis Hancock firing at Wotje
DD Halford firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Halford
DD Hailey firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Hailey
DD Franks firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Franks
DD Erben firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Erben
DD Dortch firing at Wotje Naval Fortress
Wotje Naval Fortress firing at DD Dortch
DD Caperton firing at Wotje Naval Fortress


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Bellary (34,33)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 7302 troops, 12 guns, 1023 vehicles, Assault Value = 641

Defending force 798 troops, 0 guns, 92 vehicles, Assault Value = 68

Japanese adjusted assault: 125

Allied adjusted defense: 31

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), leaders(-)
preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: op mode(-)

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 12 (2 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
114 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 33 (13 destroyed, 20 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!


a single Allied motorized unit was capturing the empty bases in South Western India and entered Bellary where we had a nav guard unit to guard the railroad junction against any para assaults... we had our tank regiments as mobile reserves at Hyderabad so they were railed in and attacked today, still being in strategic move mode but it was enough to dislodge the Brits... damage done to the enemy unit was light though, our tanks try to pursue the enemy... the situation in India also leaves me quite puzzled as by now the enemy should have moved a couple of hundred thousand troops onto the subcontinent but the troop count at Cochin isn't really going up at all...


Assaulting units:
4th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
12th Tank Regiment
8th Tank Regiment
15th Tank Regiment
22nd Tank Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
9th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
19th Tank Regiment
14th Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment
18th Tank Regiment
47th Naval Guard Unit

Defending units:
Gardner's Horse Regiment


User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 06, 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Fergusson Island at 103,132

Japanese Ships
APD Tade

Allied Ships
SS O19

SS O19 is sighted by escort
APD Tade fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at 34,34 (near Bellary)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5472 troops, 0 guns, 1023 vehicles, Assault Value = 580

Defending force 644 troops, 0 guns, 83 vehicles, Assault Value = 54

Japanese adjusted assault: 391

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 391 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 7 (1 destroyed, 6 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
249 casualties reported
Squads: 19 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 62 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 85 (85 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1



our tank units managed to pursue the Brit motorized unit on the secondary road and our attack lead to the destruction of the enemy unit... a small but nevertheless nice victory, netting us 25 points for Allied ground losses... taking this part of India isn't all too hard but it's not that cheap...


Assaulting units:
14th Tank Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
4th Tank Regiment
15th Tank Regiment
19th Tank Regiment
12th Tank Regiment
8th Tank Regiment
18th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
9th Tank Regiment
22nd Tank Regiment
11th Tank Regiment

Defending units:
Gardner's Horse Regiment




Image
Attachments
6.jpg
6.jpg (346.23 KiB) Viewed 737 times
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 10, 44


We've been doing daily recon on Colombo and the port showed increasing numbers of ships there, same with the troop count. Today I've noticed a vast decrease in shipping, dropping by about a hundred ships. Troop count stayed about the same. Such a decrease in shipping makes me think if the enemy is finally moving units from Ceylon into South Western India.



Image
Attachments
7.jpg
7.jpg (194.7 KiB) Viewed 737 times
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 12, 44

Long range navsearch picks up an enemy convoy SE of Ceylon reported as mostly destroyers and troop transports. Hmm, not sure what this is, rather looks like a misdirected convoy as there is nothing East of Ceylon that convoy could move to.


Image
Attachments
1.jpg
1.jpg (69.05 KiB) Viewed 737 times
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 13, 44

A day later it's not one convoy that is picked up by navsearch but at least halve a dozen and when I realized what's going on I nearly spilled my beer over the keyboard. First sighting was a convoy even further East than yesterday and I just thought [&:] when suddenly a Dinah-III was shot down by CAP. CAP? WTH? Another convoy spotted, another one, two, three, four... [X(]

During the replay I wasn't all that sure what this means but looking at the sightings later on the situation seems to clear up. After the landings at Cochin I expected the enemy would wage a land campaign, first against Madras, then Hyderabad and most likely Bombay (unsure about which one first). Madras always was the most exposed base but I hoped to face a frontal attack from the West but now the enemy seems to land behind our lines, most likely at Vizagapatnam. That means our Army at Madras is in danger of being cut off while we do hold the rail lines to Hyderabad. West of Madras we still haven't sighted any real enemy Army though.

Looks like a good move as there is not much I can do against these landings and I knew the Indian coast is long and impossible to defend (feels like the German problem with the Atlantic coast). We do have a built up airbase at Hyderabad so some kind of limited airstrikes are possible but will most likely not be strong enough to really harm the enemy fleet if there are more than just two or three CVs which is what I'd expect to cover that invasion. Madras has a big airfield too but is in danger of bombardments and in range of hundreds of enemy fighters and bombers from Ceylon so that would soon turn into a bloodbath for my airunits there. Leaves me with a dozen subs from Rangoon that were ordered to move into the area, the rest of the fleet is set to Alert and a couple of air units are also flown into the region. Expected landing at Vizagapatnam in three days.


Image
Attachments
2.jpg
2.jpg (303.07 KiB) Viewed 737 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19526
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: AAR 1943

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

A day later it's not one convoy that is picked up by navsearch but at least halve a dozen and when I realized what's going on I nearly spilled my beer over the keyboard.

That would be considered alcohol abuse as that is not a proper usage for an alcoholic beverage. [;)]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Bif1961
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:52 pm
Location: Phenix City, Alabama

RE: AAR 1943

Post by Bif1961 »

Well At least, since you mentioned The Atlantic coast, the movie Longest day when the German Major manning the bunker on the Normandy coast didn't see the invasion fleet until it came out of the morning haze and mist with the classic line: Das invasion zu komt! [X(]
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Well At least, since you mentioned The Atlantic coast, the movie Longest day when the German Major manning the bunker on the Normandy coast didn't see the invasion fleet until it came out of the morning haze and mist with the classic line: Das invasion zu komt! [X(]

Yes, I can see the Allied Armada but as it stands now, I am unsure where it is going. Die Invasion kommt! [;)]
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 15, 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Chichi-jima at 110,73

Japanese Ships
E Kamome
E Tsubame

Allied Ships
SS Tautog

SS Tautog launches 4 torpedoes at E Kamome
Tautog diving deep ....
E Tsubame fails to find sub, continues to search...
E Tsubame fails to find sub, continues to search...
E Tsubame fails to find sub, continues to search...
E Tsubame attacking submerged sub ....
E Tsubame fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


Two more days have passed and both days our long range nav search spotted the Allied Armada. There must be several carriers as I lost over a dozen search aircraft. Yesterday already proved that my assumption about the invasion area was wrong! [X(] That's the problem in war, often one is thinking too much like "what would I do?" instead of "what would the enemy do?" and in this case there was no other plausible invasion site to me other than at the two bases East of Madras. As you can see on the screenshot below the Allied task forces keep moving East and it now seems like the target is Akyab. Wooof! Akyab is garrisoned but it won't hold against what he possible brings as it has to be the kitchen sink when he's doing such an operation. I had no beer to spill over my keyboard this time but I was looking at the replay and map again and said to myself that he can't be serious to mount that operation. I have Calcutta in the North, a level 9 airfield, Rangoon in the South, same as Calcutta and Mandalay to the East with a level 8 airfield. All airfields can be used to full extent and then there are even more smaller ones around.

The enemy has to cross the whole Bay of Bengal to move in reinforcements and/or supply and he can't go nowhere fast from Akyab. He can build up the base and pose a threat but if I get one good naval bombardment all his aircraft there will die in the long run. No aircraft, no defense. I have big mobile reserves that I can bring into the area and like it was at Darwin, I will have plenty of time to react as there are no roads the enemy can use to march out of Akyab and threaten Rangoon or the rest of Burma. In theory it might sound like a good idea to cut off my Armies in India but I'm confident that it will rather turn into a big Allied POW camp that can't be supplied without horrendous losses than the start of a succesful Burma campaign.

Of course if he can really pull this off and completely cut off my Armies in India then I have to honestly applaud him. But then the question will be how should he stop me from just marching out of India?

I understood the operation against the Marshalls halve a year ago, it was a plausible target to me, even though I would have seized the Gilberts first. It turned out bad for the Allied as the IJN fully succeeded but that operation was nowhere as dangerous as the one he seems to pull off now. So far the Allied have lost 9 CV, 2 CVL plus a good dozen CVE, I don't know what he can bring into the Bay of Bengal in 01/44 after such losses. Most likely more CVE but how many CV/CVL? 3-5? [&:] Surely nothing that would resemble a death star I'd say.

Anyways, while I didn't do much else than sending out subs two turns ago it was orange Alert last turn when I started to look more worried at the Allied move and it's red Alert now. We are now moving in every available aircraft without totally stripping other fronts of course and the fleet is in high Alert too now. There is nothing I can do to stop the invasion so the first goal is to destroy or heavily damage the Allied fleet assets so we can move in our mobile reserves to take on the Allied ground troops. Gonna be quite task I guess and the game is going from 0 to 100 in no time again.

The SRA was high on my list of a bigger Allied move early 44 (not that early though) but a move like this was nowhere on my list even though I can react to it with a delay due to my plannings to defend the SRA.



Image
Attachments
1.jpg
1.jpg (343.21 KiB) Viewed 739 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19526
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: AAR 1943

Post by RangerJoe »

Think if he went after Pegu . . . [X(]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Think if he went after Pegu . . . [X(]

Pegu? Hmmm. His task forces steadily moved towards Akyab the last couple of days, he would lose at least one day movement if he now turns South and if there is something he doesn't have then it's time. I wouldn't waste my time trying to fool me with a move all the way towards Akyab to then move the coast down all the way to Pegu. But then again, that's what I wouldn't do. [:D]

As with Akyab if he really tries to land next to Rangoon, guess there is not much chance to stop him from landing nor taking Pegu. But then? Rangoon is a tough nut, tough enough to move in reinforcements. Moulmein is garissoned too and has a level 8 airfield. So he would be one/two hexes away from a level 9 and level 8 airfield. And as soon as he has to move out his ships I can do bombardments 24/7. Pegu? No, can't be true, can it be true?
Evoken
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:51 pm

RE: AAR 1943

Post by Evoken »

I am glad action is coming back to this game again but i fear is it too soon after Marshalls disaster ? If this invasion goes bad too it might be the end of this game [X(]
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Evoken

I am glad action is coming back to this game again but i fear is it too soon after Marshalls disaster ? If this invasion goes bad too it might be the end of this game [X(]

We're in early 44 now. Even if I could sink the same number of carriers we were sinking in 42 and 43 the Allied would still outnumber me in carrier based aircraft in late 44. And that's only the carriers. The real turning point is mid 44 with the damn B-29 coming around and no base being safe within 35 hexes of any bigger Allied airfield. Due to how the game was going he must be swimming in aircraft and trained pilots (so do I though) and the only thing I see as not being in abundance are ground units as he has lost most of the Indian and Australian Army which leaves him with the US divs mostly. That's the only area where I guess I can outnumber him but my units are spread out all over the map to cover that huge frontline.

If an Allied player hands in in 44 that would be crazy after he had to go through 42 and 43 especially with the losses Mundy took and kept his fighting spirit up.

I do agree on it being too early though hence I didn't expect such a move, ever.
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

Was just thinking about how many carriers the Allied really get. Played them only a couple of times over the years but none of the games ever reached 45 as Japan always handed in in 42 or 43 at the latest so I've got no clue about the total numbers.

The 4 carriers sunk in 42 will be replaced with Essex class CVs so there will be how many? Two dozen? Means 2160 carrier based ac.

CVL? Two dozen? Another 600 ac.

Roughly 100 CVE (minus the dozen we have sunk already), so another 2400 (lol) carrier based ac if we don't count the CVE carrying replenishment squadrons. So in total I'm going to face something like 5200 carrier based ac in the next two and a halve years which is roughly 5 times more than I have sunk so far. At the moment I have 1400+ carrier based ac and I guess two more Unryus coming plus CVL Ibuki, another 150 carrier based ac. Makes roughly 1550 for me. Hmm, only comparing the carrier capacity in aircraft, he will outnumber me at least 3:1. Not even counting the British carriers.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19526
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: AAR 1943

Post by RangerJoe »

They took out the automatic replacements for ships unless the scenario turns it on.

As far as Pegu, I am not saying that he is going there. Please don't mistake that. It is just that if a player in his situation were to take lower Burma and Port Blair, he could trap your army in India. But then he has to take the Indian production away from you in order to destroy your army in India.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: AAR 1943

Post by castor troy »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 16, 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Mangalore at 28,30

Japanese Ships
SS I-23

Allied Ships
TK Ferncastle

TK Ferncastle is sighted by SS I-23
SS I-23 launches 2 torpedoes at TK Ferncastle


I-23 had the chance to sink another tanker but manages to miss with two torps... [:(]


The enemy fleet only moved one hex [&:] last turn, now eight hexes from Akyab. Mundy doesn't seem to be in a hurry even though he mentioned a couple of turns ago he wished his transports would move faster. What he isn't aware is that we have moved up big parts of the IJN from Singapore the last couple of turns when we realized the enemy is trying to land way further East than we first expected.

High Command sticks to the same plan as in the Marshalls, the fleet has to try to attack the enemy from his rear position, hence we are going to move into the Bay of Bengal and not up the Burmese Coast. This should also mean avoiding most of his subs, most important is to stay undetected so we also have to stay as far from Ceylon's nav search as possible.



Image
Attachments
1.jpg
1.jpg (335.46 KiB) Viewed 739 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”