"Static" units?

The sequel of the legendary wargame with a complete graphics and interface overhaul, major new gameplay and design features such as full naval combat modelling, improved supply handling, numerous increases to scenario parameters to better support large scenarios, and integrated PBEM++.
User avatar
76mm
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:26 am
Location: Washington, DC

"Static" units?

Post by 76mm »

Hi, I'm playing around with some scenarios and set some units to "static", ie, they shouldn't be able to move without transport.

And yet in a scenario with a 2.5 km hex scale, they can move, although not much--one hex. But for things like 122mm howitzers w/o transport, this isn't realistic--why are they moving if they are supposedly "static"?
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Lobster »

Remove the static flag and make it fixed. Unless you want it to move at some point in time. I guess 'someone' thinks the crew can drag a heavy howitzer through the mud. [8|]
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
jupiter999
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 10:34 pm

RE: "Static" units?

Post by jupiter999 »

Drag for 2.5 km??
User avatar
76mm
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:26 am
Location: Washington, DC

RE: "Static" units?

Post by 76mm »

ORIGINAL: Lobster
Remove the static flag and make it fixed. Unless you want it to move at some point in time. I guess 'someone' thinks the crew can drag a heavy howitzer through the mud. [8|]
Well, that's the problem, the howitzers need to be able to move--when they have transport.
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Lobster »

ORIGINAL: 76mm
ORIGINAL: Lobster
Remove the static flag and make it fixed. Unless you want it to move at some point in time. I guess 'someone' thinks the crew can drag a heavy howitzer through the mud. [8|]
Well, that's the problem, the howitzers need to be able to move--when they have transport.

Yes that's the whole problem. The way transport is modeled. It isn't. While it's possible to dismount infantry you lose your heavy weapons in the process so no artillery for the most part. When a unit dismounts the heavy stuff needs to be left on the map and the flag for that equipment needs to be changed to fixed. Then when it mounts again (limbered for artillery) the flag needs to be changed back to static. But I don't know if there's a way to do that while a game is in progress.

However, even the new dismounted feature is screwed up. I can dismount a German unit and if it has 150mm light guns they stay. But all the 75mm AT guns are gone. How can they drag a 150mm sIG33 howitzer and have it keep up with the infantry but not the much lighter 75mm PAK97 AT guns?
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
76mm
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:26 am
Location: Washington, DC

RE: "Static" units?

Post by 76mm »

What a mess...disappointing. I haven't even looked at the dismount feature yet, so I can see I've got more frustration ahead...

User avatar
cathar1244
Posts: 1321
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:16 am

RE: "Static" units?

Post by cathar1244 »

Well, that's the problem, the howitzers need to be able to move--when they have transport.

What about the equipment flags?

It sounds like FLAG1 includes 2 in its sum (can move slowly without transport).

FLAG0 should include 16 in its sum (must have transport to move).

Cheers
User avatar
76mm
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:26 am
Location: Washington, DC

RE: "Static" units?

Post by 76mm »

ORIGINAL: cathar1244
It sounds like FLAG1 includes 2 in its sum (can move slowly without transport).

FLAG0 should include 16 in its sum (must have transport to move).
FLAG0 is already set to 16, and FLAG1 is 32 (Long Range), so according to the Flag descriptions, the howitzers should not be able to move without transport. And yet, they can move 2.5 km per turn.
User avatar
cathar1244
Posts: 1321
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:16 am

RE: "Static" units?

Post by cathar1244 »

ORIGINAL: 76mm
ORIGINAL: cathar1244
It sounds like FLAG1 includes 2 in its sum (can move slowly without transport).

FLAG0 should include 16 in its sum (must have transport to move).
FLAG0 is already set to 16, and FLAG1 is 32 (Long Range), so according to the Flag descriptions, the howitzers should not be able to move without transport. And yet, they can move 2.5 km per turn.

And the unit in question has only the howitzers as its equipment?

Cheers
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Lobster »

ORIGINAL: 76mm
ORIGINAL: cathar1244
It sounds like FLAG1 includes 2 in its sum (can move slowly without transport).

FLAG0 should include 16 in its sum (must have transport to move).
FLAG0 is already set to 16, and FLAG1 is 32 (Long Range), so according to the Flag descriptions, the howitzers should not be able to move without transport. And yet, they can move 2.5 km per turn.

Uhm...brawny artillerymen?
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
Hellen_slith
Posts: 2009
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:46 pm

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Hellen_slith »

even today


Image
Attachments
brawnyartillerymen.jpg
brawnyartillerymen.jpg (79.39 KiB) Viewed 794 times
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Lobster »

ORIGINAL: Hellen_slith

even today


Image

Asphalt lot. Now let's see them drag it along a WW2 Soviet 'road'. [;)]

Dang, why didn't they put some decent wheels on that thing?
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Lobster »

Drag this. [:D]


Image
Attachments
203how.jpg
203how.jpg (12.94 KiB) Viewed 794 times
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
Hellen_slith
Posts: 2009
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:46 pm

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Hellen_slith »

Sure. Give me a couple of Marines or a few dozen Army. Or a couple hundred Navy.

And a lever and a fulcrum.
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Lobster »

ORIGINAL: Hellen_slith

Sure. Give me a couple of Marines or a few dozen Army. Or a couple hundred Navy.

And a lever and a fulcrum.

I assume the Air Force doesn't have enough personnel. [;)]
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
User avatar
76mm
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:26 am
Location: Washington, DC

RE: "Static" units?

Post by 76mm »

ORIGINAL: cathar1244
And the unit in question has only the howitzers as its equipment?
Sorry for delay, I've been traveling.

Yes, the howitzers were the only equipment--actually, my mistake, they are not howitzers but the 122mm M31 guns--they weigh more than 7,000 kg and I don't find it realistic at all that they could be manhandled 2.5 km in the course of a 6 hour turn.

But moreover, if an attribute says "cannot move without transport", it sure seem that, um, it shouldn't be able to move without transport?
User avatar
cathar1244
Posts: 1321
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:16 am

RE: "Static" units?

Post by cathar1244 »

ORIGINAL: 76mm
ORIGINAL: cathar1244
And the unit in question has only the howitzers as its equipment?
Sorry for delay, I've been traveling.

Yes, the howitzers were the only equipment--actually, my mistake, they are not howitzers but the 122mm M31 guns--they weigh more than 7,000 kg and I don't find it realistic at all that they could be manhandled 2.5 km in the course of a 6 hour turn.

But moreover, if an attribute says "cannot move without transport", it sure seem that, um, it shouldn't be able to move without transport?

Definitely a bug. My guess is that this slipped in when the additional hex scales were added.

Cheers
User avatar
76mm
Posts: 4768
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:26 am
Location: Washington, DC

RE: "Static" units?

Post by 76mm »

But IIRC the game has included 2.5 km hex scale for some time. And if you look at the 122mm guns in the editor, it shows that the "static" flag is checked, whereas if you look at the unit report in the game, it shows that the unit features "Very Slow Movement". So for some reason the static flag seems to have been repurposed to "Very Slow Movement" rather than what it says in the Manual (Section 8.4.1.1), which is "no movement without transport".

Seems like "someone" decided to change the static flag to mean "Very Slow Movement" for some reason, and then didn't bother to update the manual or the text in the editor, etc. And if I had to choose between real "Static" units and units with "Very Slow Movement", I would definitely choose the former.
User avatar
rhinobones
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2002 10:00 am

RE: "Static" units?

Post by rhinobones »

ORIGINAL: 76mm
Seems like "someone" decided to change the static flag to mean "Very Slow Movement"

Wonder if other undocumented flag changes have been made. Do you think it is possible that a different flag is now the “static” setting?

Regards
Colin Wright:
Pre Combat Air Strikes # 64 . . . I need have no concern about keeping it civil

Post by broccolini » Sun Nov 06, 2022
. . . no-one needs apologize for douchebags acting like douchebags
User avatar
Lobster
Posts: 5582
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:12 pm
Location: Third rock from the Sun.

RE: "Static" units?

Post by Lobster »

The ability for artillery to move without transport has been present forever. It's the minimum one hex per turn thing. Remove that ability from static equipment unless it has transport.
ne nothi tere te deorsum (don't let the bastards grind you down)

If duct tape doesn't fix it then you are not using enough duct tape.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the universe-Einstein.
Post Reply

Return to “The Operational Art of War IV”