The question to ask about The Italians

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay



Strategic surprise trumps much of that. The tiny Spanish army is in a peacetime deployment - located all over the country.
warspite1

Nope, wrong on all counts, next.

Wow - it's great fun writing pithy one liners that simply say I'm right isn't it?
But SPI agrees with me.[/quote]




[/quote]warspite1

One good thing has come from this ...ahem.... debate. I've cleared space by throwing out 95% of my World War II library. I've replaced them with an SPI manual.......

If anyone fancies buying one, I would recommend Rule 15(b) - its in the chapter entitled Everything you ever wanted to know about WWII but were afraid to ask [/quote]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
VPaulus
Posts: 3691
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:02 pm
Location: Portugal

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by VPaulus »

ORIGINAL: Zovs

What about Portugal?

I don't know to much about them but would not they side with the CW and Spain against a German invasion?

Portugal (the Portuguese fascist regime) was only interested in keeping the country out of the war.
They would resist to the last in keeping it neutral.
While the regime had political sympathies towards Germany and Italy, they had also to think about the Windsor treaty and its implications.
It was a political and a diplomatic effort to keep the regime and the colonies with no changes regardless the outcome of the war.
When it was obvious that the Axis powers were going to loose the war, the regime started to side with the Allies.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1

So now you are raising North Africa, where the Germans lost because Rommel didn't understand logistics, and you think that its appropriate to raise this theatre in support of your logistics argument for Spain? Wow.... So you have an entire army group [:D] in Spain being supplied by road now..... My my, that's a lot of trucks the Germans have isn't it?

They still took the Commonwealth to the brink there. And captured Tobruk. And they were facing the Commonwealth, not the puny Spaniards.

Divisions have their own supply assets built in. So, the more divisions in a force, the more supply assets, including trucks. Plus, there will be more than an army group sitting on its hands on the channel. Their truck needs will be greatly reduced, allowing loans to the forces in Spain.
warspite1

Ah okay I get you. So its better from a supply perspective for Germany to have 5 divisions in Spain than 1 or 10 rather than 5 or 50 rather than 10 - because that eases the supply situation. Gotcha. Great point.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1

So, here is the scenario (and remember, no one is talking about possession of the islands by the British despite your unsubtle and frankly disgusting attempt to put words in my mouth). The Germans have just back-stabbed their allies the Spanish by invading them, an act which - never mind the treachery itself - will lead to starvation. The Germans are now killing Spaniards, bombing civilians, offering up the usual Nazi reprisals for any offence, etc etc - in short, all the hideousness of twentieth century warfare being meted out to the Spanish population.

In response the British (with the US in the wings) are offering whole manner of rewards and as much assistance as they can provide. However they really need to be able to use the Canaries as a naval base because Gibraltar is about to be hors de combat. The use of the base not only helps the British but of course also allows some direct support for Spain.

Now, despite the fact that everyone else who has expressed an opinion sees the nonsense of your view, you maintain that the Spanish would say no to the RN. And furthermore, you think that as a result of the British offering financial and material help in return for the use of the anchorage, the Spanish will not only say no [this is too funny] but in so doing, will actually switch sides and now be BFF's with the Germans who are busy invading their country and killing their citizens....

Let's see....The Romanians started out Axis...lost untold thousands to the Russians...were invaded by the Russians (with all the above carnage)...and finished the war on the side of...the Russians! Same for the Bulgarians.

Weak countries bend with the wind. The wind, in 1940, blows from Germany. And it's even worse with Franco - he really has nowhere else to turn: The Western Democracies are not going to be his friends.

And the British are taking possession of the Canaries, as I've made clear elsewhere. If the Spanish can't get them to leave, that's possession.



[/quote]warspite1

Well I guess you felt you had a couple of choices a) you could answer my point or b) you could talk about something totally irrelevant to try and disguise your complete lack of case.

Romania and Bulgaria. Joined the Axis when? They changed sides when? What were the circumstances behind the change?

Now, look at the Spanish scenario that you were absurdly suggesting. See the point?

[/quote]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1

So you admit you have absolutely no idea what Vichy France was about, but simply think it would be really neat if the Spanish had one because France did [&:].

No. I think the reason for Vichy was to keep an enclave in France that wasn't under German occupation. Nothing else makes sense. I repeat: If that wasn't the reason, why would the Germans have ever agreed to stay out of that enclave?????

And, again, I don't see Franco having any choice but to make a deal if he doesn't want Spain handed over to the Republicans.
And incredibly you are still thinking in terms of Franco and Hitler making deals after what has just taken place???? Did you really ask why would Franco be so resistant? Did you really say that Franco would have no choice but to make a deal???? If that were true he would have caved in when Germany threatened him wouldn't he? Hitler has threatened Franco in no uncertain terms. Do you really think Franco has any reason to believe that Hitler doesn't follow through on his threats?

I mean he would make a deal after the invasion and conquest. What other choice would he have that leaves him in control of Spain in the future?
NOW, TRY AND PUT YOURSELF IN THEIR SHOES. TRY AND STOP THINKING LIKE A WAR GAMER AND TRY AND THINK OF REAL LIFE - YOU KNOW, REALITY.

Wargames are a supporting factor in my argument, not the only factor. The above is a slur, which your posts are full of. You shame yourself. Stick to the facts and stop making personal comments!!!
a) We have decided that Hitler is going to be persuaded that a Med First is the way to go

Right. And this changes his plans from history. He now knows that he wants Gibraltar if Italy joins the war - even to the point of conquering Spain. That moves negotiations up in his priorities. They will begin ASAP - long before the France operation. Furthermore, he will set a date beyond which negotiations will cease. The appropriate point for that is the instant the invasion force is ready. At that point, either Spain is on board, or invaded.
b) Hitler is now fully on board and, in line with his character, when he wants something then he wants something, and he doesn't take kindly to be told he can't have it
c) Hitler doesn't have the benefit of hindsight, he doesn't know how easy or difficult it will be to take North Africa, he has no idea about taking Turkey and the Middle East, and he doesn't know what the USSR will do and he doesn't know how tough a nut Gibraltar will be. In short he wants Spain/Gibraltar done as quickly as possible. He's delayed Barbarossa once. He will not countenance a second delay.

This plan assumes the Germans conclude that a cross-channel invasion is not feasible. That's all that's necessary to adopt a Med Strategy. It's not an unreasonable assumption.
d) He asks Franco through an intermediary in Spain
e) He asks Franco again though an intermediary in Berlin
f) He goes to see Franco in person to get this sorted
g) His foreign minister asks Franco. Franco makes warm noises and Hitler orders preparations to begin in earnest, including the training of the units that will undertake the assault. More intelligence operations are launched with Franco's assistance. Hitler is now really keen to get this done and thinks he has Franco's buy-in but.....
h) Mussolini is asked to speak to Franco
i) Canaris asks Franco
d) - i) is largely as per history
j) Exasperated, Hitler, desperate to avoid invading his nominal ally, but tired of the prevarication, threatens Franco to make him see reason. Hitler's had a really rubbish summer since the fall of France and time is starting to slip away. His threat to Franco is unambiguous....
k) Hitler, by now in the sort of mood he was in after someone gave him the news about the coup in Yugoslavia, and with any reticence or reluctance to attack Spain overtaken by sheer anger and frustration, gives the order to invade. He orders the bombing of Madrid and calls it Operation Retribution (he will have to come up with another name now for bombing Belgrade or maybe just call that Retribution II [;)])

Invasion on the deadline - sometime in July.
l) The Germans begin the attack and take some losses, but generally start to gain ground. Spanish resistance can't last forever and Franco does what?
m) Franco now surrenders. Really? After standing up to Hitler - even when directly threatened, he now simply throws in the towel????

Again, eventually Spain will be conquered. At that point, Franco will be ripe for a deal - since he has no place to turn.
n) But let's go with that nonsense for a minute. You actually think Hitler, having been pushed down a path of invasion that has done his credibility with his axis and potentially axis countries no good whatsoever, that has cost him time and losses, is just going to roll his eyes and say yeah sure Franco, me ol' mucker, no problem?

If it gets a Vichy Spain, of course!
p) All this assumes that Franco isn't overthrown as soon as he suggests a surrender.

Once Spain is conquered, why would a very favorable deal cause that reaction? Especially from his fascist cronies?

warspite1

So you still won't talk about your thoughts on a 'Vichy' Spain. Well, I'm still not doing your work for you and I'm still not answering your stupid questions

As for the rest of this post, sorry but it's just more of the same well worn, and frankly laughable nonsense. You talk of Spain getting a "very favourable deal" but have not the foggiest notion about which you talk.

If Franco had got a "very favourable deal" he may well have joined Hitler. Hitler couldn't - never mind wouldn't - Hitler couldn't give Spain all that she needed. But now, according to you, Spain will get a "very favourable deal". Yes I guess if you count starvation, an even more wrecked economy, absolutely no access to oil, no Gibraltar, no Spanish Morocco and an occupied country a "very favourable deal" then I guess you have a point [8|]

Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1

This is the point. I've provided the quotes from Mussolini and Badoglio on how they saw Italy's role in the war, Italy's need to win her own victories and to fight her own parallel war (and indeed this was reinforced to Mussolini when Hitler refused to give Italy the spoils she thought were coming her way after the fall of France). German assistance was not wanted and not needed (or so they thought [8|]).

If Curtis Lemay can produce anything that suggests anything other than the above then it would at least give some credence to his proposal. But, as far as I know, there is nothing to be produced that in any way would support his view. What we know is that Mussolini wanted - and needed - victory in Egypt to be Italy's victory alone for the reasons mentioned above. This was his thinking in late June 1940.

If Curtis Lemay wants anyone to believe that Mussolini could be TOLD by Hitler that his troops could not attack Egypt, that they must cower in Tripoli* while Germany invades Spain (in Italy's sphere of influence - and I've already shown what that would mean for Mussolini) and that Italy can't make any plans for action against Yugoslavia or Greece, then he needs to provide some evidence to support that view.

We've been over this again and again. The Germans adopt a Med Strategy. Obviously, the Italians must be made privy to that strategy if they are to be included in the Spain garrison and partake in the effort to trap the British in Libya. Once Mussolini knows of the German plan to take Suez via Turkey, they would be idiots to make a try at it from Libya.
- It supposes that the British don't attack the Italians before they retreat

- Or worse, it supposes the British, more mobile than the Italians, don't catch the Italians while strung out and retreating.....

The Commonwealth aren't ready for the raid till much later. And its success owed much to the poor deployments the Italians were in. If they retreat soon enough they will be safe.
- It supposes that the British don't actually destroy the Italians in Tripolitania in the way they did in Egypt/Cyrenaica in real life. The problem there of course being that if they did then Tripoli would fall and that would be goodnight Libya and the Italian presence in North Africa, not to mention the loss of the Italian 5th and 10th Armies....Whoops!

By the time the Commonwealth can get there (assuming they do, since they historically stopped far short of Tripoli) Rommel will be in place.
warspite1


Even more clueless than the previous posts. I love a robust debate, but your comments are almost troll like now, to the point of being so lame, so witless, there is no point debating. You simply can't believe what you are writing so I guess you are just doing this for a laugh.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1

warspite1

Of course you don't attempt a timeframe - that would mean putting some effort into what you say.

I want to repeat my Pyramid example, because it's so appropriate: "The Pharaoh wants his pyramid as soon as possible - but it still takes 20 years to build."

The Pharaoh doesn't know how long it will take to finish the pyramid. But it still gets built. Same here. I don't know how long the campaign will take. But it will still get done.

warspite1

Mmmmm kinda missed the point yet again haven't you Curtis Lemay. You see timescales are actually kind of important in a situation like this. But why set timescales? I mean seriously, why put ANY effort in at all? You haven't so far so I must confess, you didn't disappoint.

[/quote]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
ORIGINAL: warspite1

The comment re Piteas and UP844 was about as childish as it gets. No, you don't DEFER to these gentlemen because of their nationality, but you can seek to engage with them to understand more about their views which, given their nationality MAY prove of interest to the debate. But apparently that thought never occurred to you - but then it wouldn't would it? You are Curtis Lemay and you are always right and neither believed what you were saying to be correct.

You seem to think I should defer to anyone Spanish about Spain and anyone Italian about Italy.
warspite1

Which part of the English language do you not understand?????? I've said exactly the opposite and in posting that you simply make yourself look cheap. Not for the first time your debating style is dishonest and you seek to accuse me of saying things I haven't said. Apology please.

[/quote]warspite1

And funnily enough, no apology from you after this crass, dishonest response.....
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: VPaulus
ORIGINAL: Zovs

What about Portugal?

I don't know to much about them but would not they side with the CW and Spain against a German invasion?

Portugal (the Portuguese fascist regime) was only interested in keeping the country out of the war.
They would resist to the last in keeping it neutral.
While the regime had political sympathies towards Germany and Italy, they had also to think about the Windsor treaty and its implications.
It was a political and a diplomatic effort to keep the regime and the colonies with no changes regardless the outcome of the war.
When it was obvious that the Axis powers were going to loose the war, the regime started to side with the Allies.
warspite1

Thanks for the input VP. I've seen comments that suggest the Germans wouldn't let an independent Portugal survive if the Germans entered Spain. I've also seen comments to suggest that Germany would just keep a watching brief. Trouble with either is that they would need a garrison either way.

Difficult to know how that one would go in either scenario.

If Spain joined the Axis would they seek to incorporate Portugal do you think? What were Spanish-Portuguese relations like in 1940?

If Spain refuses to join the Axis, would the Germans seek to occupy Portugal? We know Hitler was paranoid about his flanks and exposed coastline...

I would welcome your thoughts.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

Vichy France (now an Axis ally)
warspite1

I think I've been asking the wrong question. The correct question should have been:

Is there anything that you DO actually understand about World War II????
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Zovs
Posts: 9275
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:02 pm
Location: United States

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by Zovs »

ORIGINAL: VPaulus
ORIGINAL: Zovs

What about Portugal?

I don't know to much about them but would not they side with the CW and Spain against a German invasion?

Portugal (the Portuguese fascist regime) was only interested in keeping the country out of the war.
They would resist to the last in keeping it neutral.
While the regime had political sympathies towards Germany and Italy, they had also to think about the Windsor treaty and its implications.
It was a political and a diplomatic effort to keep the regime and the colonies with no changes regardless the outcome of the war.
When it was obvious that the Axis powers were going to loose the war, the regime started to side with the Allies.


VPaulus, thank you that shed some good light on Portugal for me. I much appreciate it
Image
Beta Tester for: War in the East 1 & 2, WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific, Valor & Victory, Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm, Computer War In Europe 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator
Tester for WDS games
User avatar
Zovs
Posts: 9275
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:02 pm
Location: United States

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by Zovs »

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: VPaulus
ORIGINAL: Zovs

What about Portugal?

I don't know to much about them but would not they side with the CW and Spain against a German invasion?

Portugal (the Portuguese fascist regime) was only interested in keeping the country out of the war.
They would resist to the last in keeping it neutral.
While the regime had political sympathies towards Germany and Italy, they had also to think about the Windsor treaty and its implications.
It was a political and a diplomatic effort to keep the regime and the colonies with no changes regardless the outcome of the war.
When it was obvious that the Axis powers were going to loose the war, the regime started to side with the Allies.
warspite1

Thanks for the input VP. I've seen comments that suggest the Germans wouldn't let an independent Portugal survive if the Germans entered Spain. I've also seen comments to suggest that Germany would just keep a watching brief. Trouble with either is that they would need a garrison either way.

Difficult to know how that one would go in either scenario.

If Spain joined the Axis would they seek to incorporate Portugal do you think? What were Spanish-Portuguese relations like in 1940?

If Spain refuses to join the Axis, would the Germans seek to occupy Portugal? We know Hitler was paranoid about his flanks and exposed coastline...

I would welcome your thoughts.

Excellent questions warspite! Looking forward to seeing some answers.

I always thought (but did not know) that the Portuguese were pro Allied all the way.

This thread has educated me on both Spain and Portugal. I did not realize that there were still by 1940 several factions in Spain, I thought that Franco just ran the whole show and that Portugal was pro Allied.

Thanks for all the learning.
Image
Beta Tester for: War in the East 1 & 2, WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific, Valor & Victory, Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm, Computer War In Europe 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator
Tester for WDS games
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19526
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay



Strategic surprise trumps much of that. The tiny Spanish army is in a peacetime deployment - located all over the country.
warspite1

Nope, wrong on all counts, next.

Wow - it's great fun writing pithy one liners that simply say I'm right isn't it?
But SPI agrees with me.
[/quote]

Who gives a **** what SPI believes, they were in it to make money, not to be historically accurate. You don't think that they Spanish weren't mobilizing and planning?
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19526
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Zovs

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: VPaulus



Portugal (the Portuguese fascist regime) was only interested in keeping the country out of the war.
They would resist to the last in keeping it neutral.
While the regime had political sympathies towards Germany and Italy, they had also to think about the Windsor treaty and its implications.
It was a political and a diplomatic effort to keep the regime and the colonies with no changes regardless the outcome of the war.
When it was obvious that the Axis powers were going to loose the war, the regime started to side with the Allies.
warspite1

Thanks for the input VP. I've seen comments that suggest the Germans wouldn't let an independent Portugal survive if the Germans entered Spain. I've also seen comments to suggest that Germany would just keep a watching brief. Trouble with either is that they would need a garrison either way.

Difficult to know how that one would go in either scenario.

If Spain joined the Axis would they seek to incorporate Portugal do you think? What were Spanish-Portuguese relations like in 1940?

If Spain refuses to join the Axis, would the Germans seek to occupy Portugal? We know Hitler was paranoid about his flanks and exposed coastline...

I would welcome your thoughts.

Excellent questions warspite! Looking forward to seeing some answers.

I always thought (but did not know) that the Portuguese were pro Allied all the way.

This thread has educated me on both Spain and Portugal. I did not realize that there were still by 1940 several factions in Spain, I thought that Franco just ran the whole show and that Portugal was pro Allied.

Thanks for all the learning.

Spain had both pro-German and pro-English/British/Allied people in the government. But Spain depended upon the Allies and their friends such as the US to keep them supplied with food and fuel. Not all that the Spanish government wanted but what they needed so no excess would go to Germany.

Vichy was not a Nazi-German ally, the US did ship food there for awhile. But the Vichy regime did cooperate with the Nazi Germans.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

As indicated in the posts yesterday, I think this thread has long since passed it's usefulness. There doesn't appear to be a consensus on any single point. I mean that shouldn't be possible if everyone comes at this with an open mind.

This is Lemay's counterfactual scenario and one he is proposing would have worked for Germany, it is his case to make. But sadly it appears he has no interest in doing that (or at least not in a constructive way).

He believes a series of (apparently concise) one line answers without the need for much supporting 'evidence' is all that is required to confirm that he is right - and who knows? Perhaps he is. But the little 'evidence' he has provided to support his view, is made up of a war game manual, a war game rule book, a war game map, a couple of irrelevant Wiki paragraphs and a WWII Atlas. I believe these should have the appropriate weight placed on them i.e. not much.

Just as disappointing - and hugely surprising I must say - is that he actually has shown a remarkable lack of knowledge about World War II, and I have simply lost count of the number of factual inaccuracies he's offered up. Suggesting Vichy was an Axis ally was probably the last straw for me. We all make mistakes now and again, but such a lack of knowledge about so many aspects of WWII doesn't give confidence when discussing counterfactuals - I mean one needs to know something of the actual history right?

So if anyone is interested I will jot down a Med First counterfactual and would welcome thoughts and insights so that we can come to a consensus on what we think may have been possible (recognising that our knowledge is necessarily limited (we are not historians!) but that, as war gamers with a keen interest in what we play, many of us will have at least some knowledge to impart).

I envisaged that this would have been how the thread would have panned out originally but despite repeated requests for a case to be made, its clearly not going to happen. I'll make a start on it and see what, if any, interest it attracts.

The essentials will be:

- Hitler is persuaded to employ a Mediterranean-First strategy to weaken the British (or ideally get them to surrender) before an assault on the Soviet Union is made in the Summer of 1942.

- This plan will involve the taking of Gibraltar and Hitler will be so persuaded by the plan, that he will - as a last resort - even be prepared to invade Spain

- A second prong of this scenario is a declaration of war against Turkey (if she can't be brought into the Axis camp) and thus a pincer move to take Egypt from the west and north.

- Moving Hitler's thinking in this way is a pretty big alteration to reality so I think we need to sensible in terms of trying to ensure we keep other key players in the scenario acting in line with their character. This doesn't mean everyone is hidebound to do what they did in WWII obviously - everyone can react to changing circumstance - but we just need to be sensible.

Hopefully this will be a bit of fun and I would like to think that there are enough war gamers in our community with WWII knowledge that would be happy to join in and give their 2 cents, or GBP 0.02 or Euro 0.02 [:)]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by Buckrock »

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: VPaulus
ORIGINAL: Zovs

What about Portugal?

I don't know to much about them but would not they side with the CW and Spain against a German invasion?

Portugal (the Portuguese fascist regime) was only interested in keeping the country out of the war.
They would resist to the last in keeping it neutral.
While the regime had political sympathies towards Germany and Italy, they had also to think about the Windsor treaty and its implications.
It was a political and a diplomatic effort to keep the regime and the colonies with no changes regardless the outcome of the war.
When it was obvious that the Axis powers were going to loose the war, the regime started to side with the Allies.
warspite1

Thanks for the input VP. I've seen comments that suggest the Germans wouldn't let an independent Portugal survive if the Germans entered Spain. I've also seen comments to suggest that Germany would just keep a watching brief. Trouble with either is that they would need a garrison either way.

Difficult to know how that one would go in either scenario.

If Spain joined the Axis would they seek to incorporate Portugal do you think? What were Spanish-Portuguese relations like in 1940?

If Spain refuses to join the Axis, would the Germans seek to occupy Portugal? We know Hitler was paranoid about his flanks and exposed coastline...

I would welcome your thoughts.
Well, you can have my thoughts in the meantime.

What operational plans Hitler authorised that did include options for a forceful entry into the Iberian Peninsula (the later Isabella, Ilona, Gisela plans) were ones that would be implemented only as a counter to the British invading the peninsula or if for some reason one or both of the Iberian countries decided to go over to the dark side and openly join Perfidious Albion against the Axis. So it would appear that if the annoying Brits didn't visit and the Iberian kids played quietly, there were no real German intention to invade and occupy them, at least until Hitler had succeeded in his plan to forcibly take ownership of Uncle Joe's living room, after that anything was possible.

As for the Spanish and Portugese regimes, they had a fairly cordial relationship, backed up by a mutual non-aggression agreement (the Iberian Pact) but probably what really kept in line any ambitions that Franco had for Spanish expansion was that he could do little without German military support, which meant (gasp) commitment to Herr Hitler. The Spanish may have just been strong enough on their own to successfully tackle Portugal (Franco did give it some consideration) but then Portugal would likely invoke her own treaty with Britain, who would almost certainly declare war, resulting in Germany being forced to intervene and then Franco ends up where he doesn't want to be, openly on the side of the Axis and now actively caught up in a long war but with few of the benefits he'd originally hoped to gain for Spain.

And if Spain joined the Axis (particularly in 1940), Portugal may well have then done whatever was needed to win Hitler's favor to ensure her immediate survival, including possibly allowing a German presence along their Atlantic coastal regions. Salazar had implied this to the British immediately before the BoB when no one (including Portugal) knew for sure whether the Spanish were about to go full Nazi. The Portuguese also expected such an arrangement with the Germans would immediately cost them the Azores to a Brit take-over ("Operation Brisk", in the top five on Churchill's playlist). The British counter-offer to Portugal's allowing a German presence was one where the Portuguese government would instead evacuate, forming a government-in-exile and shifting their best troops from Portugal to the Azores where they would be joined by British forces and together they could stand defiantly together while cheering on Portuguese guerrillas harassing the Axis on the mainland. Strangely, Salazar was somewhat non-committal on this plan when it was offered in 1940.

This was the only sig line I could think of.
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by Buckrock »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Hopefully this will be a bit of fun and I would like to think that there are enough war gamers in our community with WWII knowledge that would be happy to join in and give their 2 cents, or GBP 0.02 or Euro 0.02 [:)]

And hopefully you won't break the internet with a 1000+ page thread.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Buckrock

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: VPaulus



Portugal (the Portuguese fascist regime) was only interested in keeping the country out of the war.
They would resist to the last in keeping it neutral.
While the regime had political sympathies towards Germany and Italy, they had also to think about the Windsor treaty and its implications.
It was a political and a diplomatic effort to keep the regime and the colonies with no changes regardless the outcome of the war.
When it was obvious that the Axis powers were going to loose the war, the regime started to side with the Allies.
warspite1

Thanks for the input VP. I've seen comments that suggest the Germans wouldn't let an independent Portugal survive if the Germans entered Spain. I've also seen comments to suggest that Germany would just keep a watching brief. Trouble with either is that they would need a garrison either way.

Difficult to know how that one would go in either scenario.

If Spain joined the Axis would they seek to incorporate Portugal do you think? What were Spanish-Portuguese relations like in 1940?

If Spain refuses to join the Axis, would the Germans seek to occupy Portugal? We know Hitler was paranoid about his flanks and exposed coastline...

I would welcome your thoughts.
Well, you can have my thoughts in the meantime.

What operational plans Hitler authorised that did include options for a forceful entry into the Iberian Peninsula (the later Isabella, Ilona, Gisela plans) were ones that would be implemented only as a counter to the British invading the peninsula or if for some reason one or both of the Iberian countries decided to go over to the dark side and openly join Perfidious Albion against the Axis. So it would appear that if the annoying Brits didn't visit and the Iberian kids played quietly, there were no real German intention to invade and occupy them, at least until Hitler had succeeded in his plan to forcibly take ownership of Uncle Joe's living room, after that anything was possible.

As for the Spanish and Portugese regimes, they had a fairly cordial relationship, backed up by a mutual non-aggression agreement (the Iberian Pact) but probably what really kept in line any ambitions that Franco had for Spanish expansion was that he could do little without German military support, which meant (gasp) commitment to Herr Hitler. The Spanish may have just been strong enough on their own to successfully tackle Portugal (Franco did give it some consideration) but then Portugal would likely invoke her own treaty with Britain, who would almost certainly declare war, resulting in Germany being forced to intervene and then Franco ends up where he doesn't want to be, openly on the side of the Axis and now actively caught up in a long war but with few of the benefits he'd originally hoped to gain for Spain.

And if Spain joined the Axis (particularly in 1940), Portugal may well have then done whatever was needed to win Hitler's favor to ensure her immediate survival, including possibly allowing a German presence along their Atlantic coastal regions. Salazar had implied this to the British immediately before the BoB when no one (including Portugal) knew for sure whether the Spanish were about to go full Nazi. The Portuguese also expected such an arrangement with the Germans would immediately cost them the Azores to a Brit take-over ("Operation Brisk", in the top five on Churchill's playlist). The British counter-offer to Portugal's allowing a German presence was one where the Portuguese government would instead evacuate, forming a government-in-exile and shifting their best troops from Portugal to the Azores where they would be joined by British forces and together they could stand defiantly together while cheering on Portuguese guerrillas harassing the Axis on the mainland. Strangely, Salazar was somewhat non-committal on this plan when it was offered in 1940.

warspite1

Thank-you that is the sort of effort I was hoping for.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: The question to ask about The Italians

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Buckrock
ORIGINAL: warspite1

Hopefully this will be a bit of fun and I would like to think that there are enough war gamers in our community with WWII knowledge that would be happy to join in and give their 2 cents, or GBP 0.02 or Euro 0.02 [:)]

And hopefully you won't break the internet with a 1000+ page thread.
warspite1

No definitely not, after all I don't want to be accused of draining your lap top battery....[;)]

I'm over a third of the way though with this one (below) and so far the internet has remained intact so we should be okay... and if the thread doesn't prove popular then it won't be going anywhere anyway. So either way I think Sir Tim Berners-Lee's creation is safe....

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.a ... 2&#4890832
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”