Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

trujillocorreo
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:19 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by trujillocorreo »

ORIGINAL: Blast33

ORIGINAL: trujillocorreo

Hello friends.
I propose the modification in the DB of the SAM S-300V family.
Let's see the following graph:

Image

-S-300V1 / SA12A (entry into service 1983) "The development of the S-300V system was carried out in two stages. In the first stage, the system was created to combat aerodynamic targets, cruise and tactical ballistic missiles".
Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko
Use of TELAR 9A83 and TEL 9A85 vehicles and 9M83 "Gladiator" missile with a range of 75 km.

-S-300V2 / SA12B (Entry into service 1988) "In the second stage of work, the system was refined to ensure the fight against Pershing-1 type ballistic missiles, aeroballistic missiles and patrol jammers".
Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko
Introduction of the 9M82 "Giant" missile with a 100 km range, TELAR 9A82, TEL 9A84 vehicles and 9S19 "High Screen" radar.

-S-300V3 (Entry into service 1998) S-300V17V2 upgrade block.
"An updated S-300V system for the RF Armed Forces. NIEMI, without issuing special decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation, on its own initiative and in agreement with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, modernized the S- system. 300V ".
Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko
"Block upgrade with extended engagement range missiles, with a claimed doubling of range performance against aerial targets".
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Giant-Gladiator.html
Introduction of the 9M83M missiles with 150 km of range and 9M82M with 200 km of range.

-S-300VM. Proposal for a new system or deep modernization from the mid-1990s. Not adopted by the Russian Federation.
"On the basis of the S-300V air defense system, an air defense system was developed, which provides the ability to intercept ballistic missiles with a range of up to 2500 km, and the maximum range of destruction of aerodynamic targets was increased to 250 km ".
Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko
It offered deep digitization, LCD screens, better response times and simplification in the number and types of vehicles.

-S-300VM ANTEY 2500. SA-23. Early 2000 export version based on the S-300VM proposal. It only uses TELAR 9A83ME vehicles with four 9M83ME missiles and TEL 9A84ME with two 9M82ME missiles. Replacement of the FCR 9S32 radar by the 9S32ME with a greater range of 400 km. The range of the 9M82M missile is increased from 200 km to 250 km with the 9M82ME and that of the 9M83M is decreased from 150 km to 130 km in the 9M83ME.

Image
Image

-S-300VMD. Modernization block of the S-300VM that introduces the Giant missile with extended range 9M82MD (For domestic use) with a range of 400 km and the 9M82MDE (For export) with a range of 350 km.

S-300V4. (Entry into service 2015) Deep modernization, based on VM and VMD versions.
"Modernized S-300V system. This upgrade made it possible to double the range of improved systems compared to the basic ones. Modernization was carried out in accordance with TZ GRAU both at the expense of the state and at the expense of its own funds received from the sale of military equipment through military-technical cooperation in the implementation of contracts from OJSC "PK Concern" Antey "for the supply of" Tor "and S-300V systems. The performance characteristics of the S-300V are between 1.5 and 2.3 times higher than the capacities of the S-300V3 ".
Источник: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/ ВТС «БАСТИОН» A.V.Karpenko
Same structure and vehicles as the ANTEY 2500, but replacing the 9M82M missile with the 9M82MD with a range of 400 km and the 9M83ME with a range of 130 km, by the 9M83M with a 150 km range.

ANTEY 4000. Export version of the S-300V4 offered at ARMY 2020.
"It is reported, in particular, that the range of destruction of aerodynamic targets by the 9M83ME missiles has increased from 130 to 150 km, and 9M82MDE, from 350 to 380 km. The altitude of destruction of aerodynamic targets by the 9M82MDE missiles increased from 30 to 33 km.
"The ability to hit ballistic targets has been significantly expanded. The maximum velocity of warheads hitting ballistic targets has increased from 4,500 to 4,800 m / s. The destruction range of tactical missiles has increased from 30 to 45 km, and the altitude has increased from 25 to 27 km ".
https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?r ... 17&lang=RU

Typical configuration of an ANTEY 2500 / S-300V4 / ANTEY 4000 battalion:

Image

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Giant-Gladiator.html
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/antey-4000-s-300v4/
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300vm/
https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?r ... 17&lang=RU
https://en.topwar.ru/168997-zenitnaja-r ... raket.html
Modern Russian and Chinese Integrated Air Defence Systems The Nature of the Threat, Growth Trajectory and Western Options. Justin Bronk

Good research and some additions:
<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary> The maximum range missile 9M82MDE is not operational yet.</summary>
<detail>
Article 9 April 2020
SAM 9M82MV (9&#1052;82&#1052;&#1042; in Russian) after successful design and factory tests by our Ministry of Defense "is not noticed" and the S-300V4 air defense system was not introduced. But in the media there was information about the introduction of a similar missile defense system into the S-500 air defense system being developed. This is probably correct. But the reality is that the S-300V family of air defense systems, already deployed in the theater of operations (in the military districts), which include a specialized autonomous radar for detecting ballistic targets and ensuring their most effective defeat, as well as a successfully tested gas-dynamic missile, this missiles are not included. And in the developed S-500 air defense system, which has less capabilities for detecting ballistic targets, especially those separated in flight by the MRBM main unit, an air defense missile interception missile system is introduced, created, by the way, on the basis of technical solutions implemented in the C-300V4 air defense missile system.
What is it - a lack of understanding of the current situation or lack of initiative and negligence? And where is military science and its opinion on this issue?

The author is Alexander Luzan, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation,retired lieutenant general, former chairman of the State Commission on
tests of the S-300VM air defense system - the predecessor of the S-300V4,ex-deputy commander (chief) of the Air Defense Forces of the Land Armament Troops - Chief Engineer of the Air Defense Forces of the Ground Forces

So intercepts above 35km of height is not possible and a max range of about 30 km againtst ballistic target, see picture from the same article.

</detail>
<evidence>https://translate.googleusercontent.com ... rtbbw1epfg
</evidence>


Image

Hello Blast33

We are talking about different missiles, although all derived from 9M82.
In your post you are mixing three different types of missiles:
9M82MDE = Export version of the 9M82MD, with a range of 350 km and 35-37 km of service ceiling. Offered with the ANTEY 4000 and ABM ABAKAN system featured at ARMY 2020.
9M82MD = Extended range domestic version of the 9M82M with a range of 400 km, 35-37 km of service ceiling and speed of mach 7.5. Introduced with the S-300V4 in 2015.
9M82MV = Proposed exoatmospheric ABM version of the 9M82MD for the S-300V4 with a range of 350 km and between 70-90 km of service ceiling with dynamic gas control to maneuver at these heights at mach 9 speeds. Possibly ARH. Successfully tested in 2006 , there is no data of its entry into service.

Evidence:
https://tass.com/russia/781138
https://tass.com/defense/898884
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... ovator.htm
http://www.vko.ru/taktika/zadacha-trudn ... reshaemaya
https://hr.rbth.com/science/88105-s-300v4-foto
https://medium.com/war-is-boring/surpri ... 5fda744c92
https://twitter.com/VinodDX9/status/104 ... 98112?s=20
https://en.topwar.ru/124347-vozdushnyy- ... ae-pd.html
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by kevinkins »

In the news today, Oct 1 2020.

Not sure if the player can add 4 more Hellfires or that has to be completed by the DB Admin.

https://www.airforcemag.com/mq-9-softwa ... -capacity/
“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
BDukes
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>US Army reeive Iron Dome. Add US Army Iron Dome to DB. IOC 2020</summary>
<detail>US Army receive Iron Dome. Looks like Israeli radar and missile configuration. This looks to be independent of MML launcher program. Can copy entry 2601</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.defense-aerospace.com/artic ... -army.html
https://www.defensenews.com/digital-sho ... dome-deal/
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>US Reapers can now carry 8 hellfires</summary>
<detail>MQ-9 Reaper now have 8 hellfire loadout.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.defense-aerospace.com/artic ... siles.html
https://www.airforcemag.com/mq-9-softwa ... -capacity/
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
jun5896
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:29 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by jun5896 »

ORIGINAL: pxl919092

There are possible errors with 055/DF-100 from the recent DB updates. DBv487 still have the same issue.

For "#2834 Type 055 destroyer", number of channels for the SA-10 missile datalink is wrong. in DB487 it has a value of 1. In the cheaper and older 052D, the number of SA-10 channel is 24.

So now a 055 can only hit one aerial target at a time, while 052D can handle 24.

Also For "#3669 DF-100", the cruise attitude is 24000 ft AGL. I suppose it is a typo and mean 240,000 ft instead? This thing was flying at Mach 4.6 and Band1 Performance section states it has a ceiling of 1,850,000 feet.


ScenEdit_UpdateUnit({guid = '#2834 - Type 055 Nanchang', mode = 'remove_comms', dbid =3})
ScenEdit_UpdateUnit({guid = '#2834 - Type 055 Nanchang', mode = 'add_comms', dbid =138})
jun5896
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 3:29 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by jun5896 »

#2201 F-22A Raptor(2019)
#4972 F-22A Raptor(2020)

Two F-22A rcs worse than #691 F-22A Raptor(2013)

Image
#2201, #4972

Image
#691



<type>Update</type>
<summary>#4107 F-23 Black Widow II(2016)</summary>
<detail>F-23 Black Widow II now upgrade AN/APG-77(v)1 AESA radar.</detail>


<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add F-23 Black Widow II(2022) based on #4107 </summary>
<detail>Add F-23 Black Widow II for AIM-260 JATM, AIM-9X Block III variants.</detail>

jimmyblond
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:31 am
Contact:

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by jimmyblond »

Someone managed somehow to forget coal burning power stations in both facility DBs. So please add them.
BDukes
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Look like SU-35 will have R-37M/AA-13 loadout</summary>
<detail>Pictures of SU-35 R-27M/AA-13 test shot now on net. R-27M already in db and in Mig-31 and Mig-35 loadout</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/kad_ghani/status/13 ... 4312801281
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
benboy1996
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 3:21 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by benboy1996 »

SAM Plt (Starstreak II Stormer) (United Kingdom - 2011) and variants are unable to engage slow moving loitering munitions like "Harop" because they are classed as guided weapons and the former can only engage aircraft/helicopters.
KnightHawk75
Posts: 1850
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 7:24 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KnightHawk75 »

<type>DELETE</type>
<summary>Newer Sensor AN/APY-9 Entry #6108 Appears Exact Duplicate of sensor AN/APY-9 #2181</summary>
<detail>Looking at Sensor entry #6108 the entries are identical, the sensor codes and related capabilities and freq flags are all the same as the long existing #2181. Looking throughout the database where sensors would normally be associated doesn't turn up any references to #6108, so not only may it be a duplicate it also does not appear to be used. At least not yet. If there are plans to adjust 6108 in the future with different specs, so be it and ignore this request, but if not it just causes confusion and longer it's out there more chance to break a future migration if\when it's removed. </detail>
<evidence>
db3k_486.db3, db3k_487.db3
</evidence>
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Blast33 »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add Warmate loitering munition</summary>
<detail>Poland (100) and the UAE, Turkey, Ukraine and Peru & this weapon was also observed in Lybia.

Description:
The WARMATE constitutes a good alternative for anti-tank guided missiles with its capability to operate in a significantly larger radius, allowing comfortable detection and observation of the potential target in a relatively large time span (the flight time is ca. 70 minutes). Optionally the system can be equipped with a laser-seeking warhead.

Warmate may use a 1 kg warhead of two types: high-explosive/fragmentation GO-1 warhead, or HEAT GK-1 warhead. The HEAT warhead makes it possible to penetrate up to 240 millimetres of armour in case of a direct hit. This enables the user to apply the UAV in question, in order to act against numerous armoured vehicles present within the battlefield, especially in cases when the top section of the armour is hit. The fragmentation warhead, on the other hand, which is a more typical payload for this system, weighs 1 kilogram, whereas the explosive material constitutes 300 grams of its weight, with effective radius of explosion of 10 meters.

Technical details WARMATE loitering munitions
Operating range 15 km LOS
Endurance 70 min
Wingspan 1,6 m
Fuselage length 1,1 m
Maximum take-off weight 5,3 kg
Maximum payload weight 1400 g
Pu&#322;ap operacyjny 3000 m AMSL
Maximum speed during attack up to 150 km/h
At distances of up to 10 kilometres, the system has a flight endurance of up to 30 minutes.

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.defence24.com/warmate-polis ... ady-signed
https://www.wbgroup.pl/en/produkt/warma ... unnitions/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzzOH5f ... e=emb_logo
https://twitter.com/ContactIdbam/status ... 7206932481
https://twitter.com/martinbroek/status/ ... 6742346752
</evidence>

Image
Attachments
1.jpg
1.jpg (73.03 KiB) Viewed 1060 times
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Blast33 »

Hello Blast33

We are talking about different missiles, although all derived from 9M82.
In your post you are mixing three different types of missiles:
9M82MDE = Export version of the 9M82MD, with a range of 350 km and 35-37 km of service ceiling. Offered with the ANTEY 4000 and ABM ABAKAN system featured at ARMY 2020.
9M82MD = Extended range domestic version of the 9M82M with a range of 400 km, 35-37 km of service ceiling and speed of mach 7.5. Introduced with the S-300V4 in 2015.
9M82MV = Proposed exoatmospheric ABM version of the 9M82MD for the S-300V4 with a range of 350 km and between 70-90 km of service ceiling with dynamic gas control to maneuver at these heights at mach 9 speeds. Possibly ARH. Successfully tested in 2006 , there is no data of its entry into service.

Sorry for the mixup, tnx for the correction, I will drink more coffee [;)]
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by kevinkins »

In development:

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... plane-test

Perhaps similar to adding 4 additional Hellfires to the Reaper drone (Oct 1 post here). Maybe it will require more work with the DB than that.
Might be interesting to play around with. Looks like it would be 2 JASSM extreme-range D versions per pallet and the C-17 could carry a bunch of pallets.
“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
User avatar
.Sirius
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:21 pm
Contact:

Sea Cepter in SASS Mode

Post by .Sirius »

Hi guys
Any chance of having Sea Cepter with the Surface to Surface Mode as it is credited with it
Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law
14yellow14
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:47 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by 14yellow14 »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary> French Frigate FREMM DA ‘Alsace’ </summary>
<detail>It is the first of two air-defence frigates known as FREMM DA (Frégate Européenne Multimissions de Défense Aérienne) for the French Navy (Marine Nationale).

While the FREMM DA retains the same anti-submarine warfare (ASW) capabilities as earlier vessels of the Aquitaine-class (with CAPTAS-4 and UMS 4110 CL sonars), its so called “increased capabilities in air defense” consists in a few notable changes:

The Thales Herakles multi-function radar is more powerful , has more transmitter modules, additional wave-forms and search modes for long range air defense

A Thales STIR EO MK 2 fire control radar replaces the Najir by Sagem (providing better AAW and ASuW capabilities to the 76mm main gun)

4x Sylver A50 vertical launch systems for a total of 32x MBDA Aster 15 or 30 surface to air missiles

Additional communication systems and antennas
</detail>

<evidence>
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... y-october/

</evidence>

Image
User avatar
KLAB
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:24 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KLAB »

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>FFGX Becomes USS Constellation</summary>
<detail>First of class named USS Constellation.FFG-62</detail>
<evidence>
http://worlddefencenews.blogspot.com/20 ... s.html?m=1
https://news.usni.org/2020/10/07/secnav ... stellation
</evidence>

Thanks
K
BDukes
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Add 2020 US Navy variant of F/A-18E and F with AN/ASG-34 fuel tank combination.Australia F's will have as well</summary>
<detail>Add 2020 variant of F/A-18E and F with AN/ASG-34 fuel tank combination.US Navy F/A-18F deployed to PG with AN/ASG-34 IRST pods. Sensor #3445 in db but need fuel tank variant. Look like navy call IRST-21. Australia buy as well for F's</detail>
<evidence>
https://seapowermagazine.org/navy-deplo ... sian-gulf/
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... -track-pod
https://theaviationgeekclub.com/raaf-to ... -fighters/
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add Serbian PASARS-16 SPAAG 2020.</summary>
<detail>Serbia field new SPAAG see first picture. It mount a license build L/70 Bofors AAA gun, 4 Igla Manpads in mobile vehicle. It has laser rangefinder and day/night site It look like to be paired with M85 Zirafa (Giraffe #2575). There was a test version with different missile (RLN-C/VympelR-13) but no pictures since. </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/AndreiBtvt/status/1 ... 96/photo/3
https://militaryleak.com/2020/06/14/ser ... craft-gun/
https://janescom.sitefinity.cloud/defen ... sars-spaag
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/serb ... ars-spaag/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PASARS-16
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>MQ-25 Stingray IOC and sensor Updates</summary>
<detail>Test Squadron just form but IOC 2024. Will have integrated IR sensor.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... ittershare
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... e-missions
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary> Add FFG-11 Almirante Prat [Perry] 2020 x2</summary>
<detail>Chile buy and commission 2 ex Australian Perry Frigates Melbourne and Newcastle.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... lean-navy/
https://twitter.com/seawaves_mag/status ... 5134166016
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”