AP cost absurdity?

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Post Reply
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

AP cost absurdity?

Post by CapAndGown »

I want another army as part of Reserve Front (or perhaps Moscow M.D.) and Southwest Front has an army to spare. So I brought up the HQ to Moscow with the idea of reassigning it. Yet the AP cost of such an assignment is 31 points. This seems completely absurd considering I could reassign 31 divisions for the same cost. What's up with the seemingly insane numbers?
User avatar
fritzfarlig
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:49 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by fritzfarlig »

resign a army HQ is always more costly, I always only resign div. or create a new army HQ ist more cheap as I remember
redrum68
Posts: 1698
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:53 am

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by redrum68 »

Yeah, its almost always better to just reassign divisions and leave the army HQ structure. It can often be cheaper to just build a new Army HQ (25 AP I think) and assign it down.
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by CapAndGown »

But why would they design it this way? What's the logic?
chaos45
Posts: 2015
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2001 10:00 am

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by chaos45 »

basically you have to almost perfectly plan and set up your fronts as the soviet commander as you rebuild the soviet army in 1941 if you want an optimal chain of command.

One way to do that is leave armies you plan to use for future front on Stavka command and carefully calculate your Front AP limits and only have armies assigned to them that max them on AP....then all other armies leave on Stavka control until new fronts become available.
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by CapAndGown »

ORIGINAL: chaos45

basically you have to almost perfectly plan and set up your fronts as the soviet commander as you rebuild the soviet army in 1941 if you want an optimal chain of command.

One way to do that is leave armies you plan to use for future front on Stavka command and carefully calculate your Front AP limits and only have armies assigned to them that max them on AP....then all other armies leave on Stavka control until new fronts become available.

Planning out your army structure for 1944 in 1941 is obviously absurd.

Another option to leaving armies assigned to Stavka, if you appreciate color coordinated armies like I do [:D], is to assign the newer armies to Military Districts that don't become fronts. Then you can switch the army for free.
User avatar
fritzfarlig
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:49 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by fritzfarlig »

Remember A empty army HQ assign to STAVKA is only a paper tiger, you don’t need to assign them to any front before you have the men to fill it up and then be careful not to overstretch the AP limit on 90 for a front, that drag down your combat value
I always use my stavka armies to dig fortifications behind the front, I fill them up with brigades
redrum68
Posts: 1698
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:53 am

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by redrum68 »

Yeah I use the MDs as much as I can as they will usually give better leader checks than directly to STAVKA but can always reassign the armies elsewhere then.
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2244
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: AP cost absurdity?

Post by 56ajax »

Good reason to get WiTE2 as soon as it comes out as re assignment is free.....
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”