Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

I let them dive bomb since I know there is no AA present larger than a machine gun....
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The situation on the ground looks very good for the Allies currently around Perth. I believe Japan will have a very difficult time replacing losses.

Any suggestions for pulling off a nonbase bombardment? I have all float planes doing recon there, wirraways doing recon, set the task force to bombard, 0 range, escorts bombard, remain on station, direct, absolute. Any other ideas? Will appoint an aggressive task force commander...would inspiration help to?



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (439.15 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by witpqs »

My own experience is rather lame. I assume lots of Recon will help.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Bundaberg...situation not great, but hope to score some victories in the next day or two.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (336.14 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by ny59giants »

Its been years since I did this, but if my memory is reliable [:D], you come in as SC TF with "remain on station." The next day, switch over to "bombard TF" and allow return to base with that hex as target. I did this to west of Calcutta as Japan. Place a LRCAP over TF/hex.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Some of the ground reinforcements heading for western Australia...



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (263.48 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The British and American warships will break down into multiple small task forces race into a patrol plot ending in Chittagong where we will have fighters protecting the base. Our ships are not spotted. I suspect this will be bloody.

What a bloody game!







Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (551.43 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Its been years since I did this, but if my memory is reliable [:D], you come in as SC TF with "remain on station." The next day, switch over to "bombard TF" and allow return to base with that hex as target. I did this to west of Calcutta as Japan. Place a LRCAP over TF/hex.

Ooooh, that is not good as the tanks will move away by then.[:(] But that kind of jives with my sketchy memory of having pulled it off before...
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

If there is no CAP, have fighters strafe, they will also bomb. Even if they don't destroy the tank, they can cause a lot of disruption, fatigue, and disablements.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Turns away...I pulled the fighters back to rest and lighten the AV support demand at Perth (if they had bombs, I would have used them). Another dive bomber squadron is enroute…

I suspect a fair bit of fireworks...

This is the first time the Allies will be using multiple small task force, none smaller than 3, off Chittagong.

Japan ship losses so far:

CVL, CS, CAx3, CLx4, DDx10. That is a hefty early expansion price.





User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

For non-base bombardments the key thing seems to be a very good DL on the target. Recon night and day for a couple of turns before the bombardment, and of course have your FPs up for the bombardment itself.

I was using "remain on station" because there was no significant air threat, but usually the ships would bombard at night first.

Having two or more bombardment TFs also seemed to help - one large TF tends to have several ships that hardly fire at all while smaller ones empty their mags. And I am not sure of this, but I think the first bombardment TF raises the target DL a bit so the next one is more effective.

Edit: Forgot to mention: You can use your DDs to bombard too if you allow them to bombard and to approach closer than the 15K yards the AI likes to stay at. Someone recently posted that having the standoff range set to 0 keeps the AI from approaching closely to shore but setting it at 1 gets the DDs at least to approach as close as that (1000 yards) to shore. That seemed to be true when I tried it.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20554
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Turns away...I pulled the fighters back to rest and lighten the AV support demand at Perth (if they had bombs, I would have used them). Another dive bomber squadron is enroute…

I suspect a fair bit of fireworks...

This is the first time the Allies will be using multiple small task force, none smaller than 3, off Chittagong.

Japan ship losses so far:

CVL, CS, CAx3, CLx4, DDx10. That is a hefty early expansion price.
Unsustainable! Greta will get after them for that! [:'(]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Jan 13th, 1942

Japan going for Chittagong!



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (265.25 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

It is an absolute knife fight, and disaster strikes!

This task force was supposed to be the last in!

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (286.51 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

In Chittagong harbor, long lances strike hard again!

Combats are starting out very close in...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (282.38 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Another fight at Chittagong, and no Allied ships sunk!



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (280.07 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

No other naval combats take place...where are our light cruisers?

The bombardment is pulled off...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (145.47 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Found the IJA Tank Spearhead! I guess they turned back to clear the roadblock south of Sian?



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (278.96 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

For now we will hold here...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (481.83 KiB) Viewed 425 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

What an absolutely disappointing fight...our Light Cruisers are now 4 hexes from the IJN invasion fleet...our Heavy Cruiser intercepted the IJN after they bombarded, but got thoroughly destroyed....



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (448.36 KiB) Viewed 425 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”