Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

PN79
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 7:14 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by PN79 »

ORIGINAL: BDukes

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add Mig-29C Hungary 1994-2010 x28, 913 version</summary>
<detail>Russia give 29 to Hungary to pay debt. Can copy #1402. Look like they had alamo and archer. Sound like they underfund to rot.</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/vesthepes/status/13 ... 7908132864
https://theaviationist.com/2014/03/10/m ... d-failure/
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/p ... gister.php
</evidence>

Hungary received MiG-29 variant 9.12B produced in 1993.

There were 22 single seaters and 6 two seaters MiG-29UB (9.51). They were pulled out of service in 2010.
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Blast33 »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Update USAF KC-135;s and KC-46 Pegasus with link-16 please.</summary>
<detail>The U.S. Air Force has selected Rockwell Collins to boost the communications capabilities for its legacy tanker aircraft KC-135R fleet with the implementation of a Real Time Information in the Cockpit (RTIC) system. This will mark the first permanently installed Link 16 system for a legacy U.S. tanker aircraft. Implementation of the Real Time Information in the Cockpit (RTIC) system will provide greatly enhanced situational awareness for pilots and much improved and secure communications capabilities.

“Pilots and boom operators will now be able to view intelligence feeds on the new avionics displays we’re providing as part of their Block 45 upgrade,” said Dave Schreck, vice president and general manager of Rockwell Collins Airborne Solutions. “With information such as enemy threats, target data, and blue force locations at their fingertips, crews will gain real-time situational awareness to more effectively carry out their missions.

That will bring a data link capability and a [satellite communications] capability on the [KC-135] that it doesn’t have,” Thomas said. “We need to do more. We only have funding for 50 right now.”
Evidence link#4:
While the KC-46 comes with factory-installed systems, such as Link 16, to be better able to communicate, the older KC-135s require upgrades ...
</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.mwrf.com/markets/defense/ar ... ions-boost
https://www.c4isrnet.com/air/2020/01/06 ... ions-node/
https://www.defensenews.com/digital-sho ... e-network/
https://www.airforcemag.com/article/the ... ity-fleet/
</evidence>


User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Blast33 »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Embraer delivers first modernized E-99 AEW&C aircraft to Brazilian Air Force </summary>
<detail>November 27, 2020 – In a ceremony held today at the Embraer facility in Gavião Peixoto (São Paulo, Brazil), Embraer delivered the first modernized EMB 145 AEW&C (Airborne Early Warning and Control), designated E-99, to the Brazilian Air Force (FAB). Four additional E-99 aircraft will be modernized as part of the contract.

The mission systems and related subsystems, including electronic warfare, command and control, electronic countermeasures, and aerial surveillance radar were updated as part of the modernization process, expanding FAB's capacity to carry out Flight Control and Alarm missions and Electronic Reconnaissance, among others.

The E-99M project is conducted by COPAC with support from Embraer and various international suppliers, such as SAAB, Aeroelectronica International (AELI), and Rohde & Schwarz. In addition to modernization, the project entails technology transfer agreements that will enable technological advancements for the Brazilian defense industry.
</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.blogbeforeflight.net/2020/1 ... force.html
https://defpost.com/tag/embraer-r-99a-e ... -145-aewc/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IED_zYyWvvs
</evidence>
User avatar
SunlitZelkova
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 11:49 pm
Location: Portland, USA

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by SunlitZelkova »

Hi,

The DOD has said in its 2020 China Military Power Report that the H-6K is capable of carry a nuclear bomb. The nuclear weapon in question is already in the game.

https://fas.org/blogs/security/2020/09/ ... na-report/

https://media.defense.gov/2020/Sep/01/2 ... -FINAL.PDF

DBID #1731 H-6K Badger [God of War] (China - 2011)

Please add a loadout with 1x DBID #2136 China Type 639-6 Strategic Bomb [3.3mT Nuclear]

I have two unrelated questions for the DB manager, the first of which is what the criteria is for requesting units that have little info about them, namely the Type 096 SSBN and the H-20 stealth bomber, is. Apparently, the Type 055 destroyer was added to the game when much about it was unknown too, and it was simply given characteristics from the Type 052D as a placeholder. In addition despite much being unknown about the Type 095 SSN, it has been added to the game very recently as well. Based on comparison between the F-22 and the J-20, it might be possible to create placeholder H-20 values by making it a sort of downgraded B-2. In the case of the Type 096, it could be an upgraded Type 094, while there are decently accurate predictions of the range of its new SLBM, the JL-3. When CMANO was first released, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were the "future" for scenarios made at the time of the release. Given the precedent created by the Type 055, I hope it will be possible to have units added with placeholder/estimate values, as the required information may take quite long to (or never) be released in the case of China, due to the geopolitical situation. Especially as the "future" for CMO scenarios becomes the mid and late 2020s.

My second question is what your stance on "ultra-hypothetical" units is and whether they can be requested or not. For example, the possibility of Japan acquiring nuclear weapons and/or ballistic missiles has been raised in recent years due to the threat of North Korea. Many predict a Japanese ICBM would be based on the M-V space launch vehicle. This is where the data values for a hypothetical Japanese ICBM unit could come from. An SSBN could be based on the Soryu class, etc. Suitable placeholder units exist in the DB for the most part, but particularly for the ICBM, a new unit would be better. Of course, the data for the units would be realistic, no record breaking speeds for aircraft, sci-fi weapons, or whatever.

All of these questions are in the context of potential requests for units I need for scenarios I plan to make.

Edit- added sources for the H-6K loadout request
"One must not consider the individual objects without the whole."- Generalleutnant Gerhard von Scharnhorst, Royal Prussian Army
Parel803
Posts: 941
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:39 pm
Location: Netherlands

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Parel803 »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Jamaican Defence Force Coast Guard, HMJS Nanny of the Maroons, 1 unit, Damen Fast Crew Supplier (FCS) 5009 Cutter, ?Honour class</summary>
<detail>Length:53.2, Beam:10.1, Depth:4.7, Draught:3.5, Cargo:250, Tonnage:454, Crew:8, ExtraPersoneel:16, Speed:27, Range at max:3100, Engine:4xCaterpillar/MTU, Propulsion:4xDixedPitchPropellor, Power:6712 bkW.
Weapon: 20mm connan on bow, 2x 12.7mm browning on port&starboard, External Firefighting
Sensor: 2x radar I-band Nav (JRC)
Extra: Interceptor vessel, 8-ton Crane, deck space:240</detail>
<evidence>https://buzz-caribbean.com/news/jdf-wel ... ime-fleet/
https://products.damen.com/-/media/prod ... b37db4f44c
https://products.damen.com/en/ranges/fa ... 009-patrol
https://www.facebook.com/22025406383/po ... 957531384/
https://opm.gov.jm/news/government-boos ... ol-vessel/
https://twitter.com/jdfsoldier/status/1 ... 4438784003
</evidence>
with regards
Parel803
Posts: 941
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:39 pm
Location: Netherlands

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Parel803 »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Jamaican Defence Force Coast Guard, HMJS Cornwal, 3 units, Damen build, Stan Patrol 4207 (in DB), ?County class</summary>
<detail>Length:42.8, beam:7.1, depth:3.8, draught:2.5, tonnage:241, crw:12, ExtraPers:6, speed:26.5, Range:2450 at cuise(12)Speed, Engine:2x Caterpillar, Power:4700 bkW, Propulsion:2xControllablePitchPropellors, ExternalFireFighting, SmallRhib SternLaunchingRamp
Sensor: 2x nav radar (1xI-band, I-E/F-band) (JRC/Alphatron)</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.vesselfinder.com/nl/vessels ... -339109100
https://twitter.com/andrewholnessjm/sta ... 7705889792
https://navyrecognition.com/m/index.php ... newal.html
https://products.damen.com/en/ranges/st ... atrol-4207
https://products.damen.com/-/media/prod ... b61216b421
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County-cl ... rol_vessel
</evidence>
with regards
Parel803
Posts: 941
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:39 pm
Location: Netherlands

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Parel803 »

ORIGINAL: Parel803

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Jamaican Defence Force Coast Guard, HMJS Cornwal, 3 units, Damen build, Stan Patrol 4207 (in DB), ?County class</summary>
<detail>Length:42.8, beam:7.1, depth:3.8, draught:2.5, tonnage:241, crw:12, ExtraPers:6, speed:26.5, Range:2450 at cuise(12)Speed, Engine:2x Caterpillar, Power:4700 bkW, Propulsion:2xControllablePitchPropellors, ExternalFireFighting, SmallRhib SternLaunchingRamp
Sensor: 2x nav radar (1xI-band, I-E/F-band) (JRC/Alphatron)</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.vesselfinder.com/nl/vessels ... -339109100
https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/HM ... -339110100
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/pho ... lid=300643
https://twitter.com/andrewholnessjm/sta ... 7705889792
https://navyrecognition.com/m/index.php ... newal.html
https://products.damen.com/en/ranges/st ... atrol-4207
https://products.damen.com/-/media/prod ... b61216b421
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County-cl ... rol_vessel
</evidence>
with regards
User avatar
TempestII
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:50 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by TempestII »

The AIM-132 ASRAAM's max range seems to be rather short (27.8km) & is identical to the AIM-2000s, despite the ASRAAM being designed to be a longer range weapon with it's larger motor & aerodynamic differences.

Several sources such as Think Defence, Global Security and Military Today put its max range at 50km (sorry can't post the links due to the forum 10 post rule).


MaxDemian
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 8:36 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by MaxDemian »

Is the radar cross section of the Arleigh Burke destroyers too high ?

According to Capt. James Kirk, the RCS of Arleigh Burke is 1/50th that of Ticonderoga cruisers, and Zumwalt 1/50th that of Burke.

This doesn't seem to be well reflected in the game database:

Ship RCS | front | side
----------------------------
Ticonderoga | 933 | 2187
Burke | 363 | 831
Zumwalt | 10 | 25
----------------------------

Source: https://navysnaevents.org/blog/wp-conte ... winter.pdf
Durendal28
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 7:56 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Durendal28 »

I noticed that weapon #713 - CBU-72/B Fuel Air Explosive [3 xBLU-73/B] is not assigned to any aircraft loadouts. I believe it was loaded on A-6Es during Operation Desert Storm.
BDukes
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Replace existing DB Chinese Mineral Radar Copy with Type 366. Hopefully just name change from Band Stand. Add Coastal Defense Variant (SLR-66).</summary>
<detail>Look like the Chinese Copy of Russian MR-331 Mineral-ME radar on ships is designated Type 366. Land based veriant exists and probably assist modern coastal defense batteries. Many Chinese, Pakistani etc. ships use this radar.</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/Lorkeske/status/1333096027486871558
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_366_radar
http://roe.ru/eng/catalog/naval-systems ... ineral-me/
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
ProdigyofMilitaryPride
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:54 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ProdigyofMilitaryPride »

I'd like to present the following, plus a simplified ver. of some of my past requests.

Mexican Navy Vessels
<Type>Add</type>
<Summary>Add ARM Quetzalcoatl (D101), [Ex-USS Vogelsgang, Gearing Class FRAM I, 1982-2014]
<detail>Former US Destroyer, sold to the Mexican Navy along with its sister ship, the Steinaker. The latter was redesignated as the Netzahualcoyotl.
Weight: 3460 Tons (Full)
Length: 390ft. 6in.
Beam: 40ft. 10in.
Draft: 14ft. 4in.
Speed: 38.6 knots
Dimensions: 390'6" (OA) x 40' 10" x 14' 4" (Max)
Radar: SPS-37
Weaponry: 6 x 5in. 38-caliber AA guns, 12 x 40mm AA, 11 x 20mm AA, 10 x 21 in. Torpedo Tubes (2x5) (Possibly Mk. 32)
Other Features: DASH Hangar/Flight Deck Aft</detail>
<Evidence>Sources:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Netza ... tl_(D-102)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Netza ... tl_(D-102)
https://web.archive.org/web/20080617140 ... guerra.htm
http://www.semar.gob.mx/galeria/buques/ ... lcoatl.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gearing-class_destroyer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Steinaker
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Vogelgesang_(DD-862)
http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/863.htm
http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/862.htm
http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/he ... </Evidence>

<Type>Add</type>
<Summary>Add ARM Cuauhtémoc (E01) [Ex-USS Harrison, Fletcher Class, 1970-2001]</summary>
<detail>Former US Destroyer, sold to the Mexican Navy alongside its sister ship, the John Rodgers. The latter was redesignated as the Cuitláhuac.
Weight: 2,050 tons
Dimensions: 369 1/4 in. at waterline, 376 1/2 in. at overall length, 39 1/2 in. beam, 17 3/4 in. draft, keel to waterline
Range: 6500nm at 15 knots
Engines: Two geared turbines, 60000 shp, 2 Propellers, 35 knots
Radar: SC-1 or SC-2?
Sonar: SQS-23
Weaponry: 5 x 5 in. Guns, 10 x 40mm AA Guns, 7 x 20mm AA Guns, 10 x 21in. Torpedo Tubes, 6 depth charge launchers, 2 depth charge racks
Crew: 273</detail>
<Evidence>Sources:
http://abbot.us/fletcher/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_John_Rodgers_(DD-574)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Harrison_(DD-573)
http://www.microworks.net/pacific/ships ... etcher.htm
http://www.steelnavy.com/FACTS.HTM
https://www.gyrodynehelicopters.com/fletcher_class.htm
https://books.google.com/books?id=8RNkK ... QS&f=false

For an overall view of the Mexican military around '96...
https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Publi ... </Evidence>

Royal Thai Ground Unit

<Type>Add</Type>
<summary>Add Facility -- M8 Stingray Light Armor Platoon x3 (Thailand, 1988-2005)</summary>
<detail>Type: Mobile Vehicles
Weapons: L7 105mm Gun, 7.62mm MG Burst
Damage: 0
Vehicle/Component Radius: 80m</detail>
<Evidence> Stingray light tank | Military Wiki | Fandom (wikia.org)</Evidence>
"The courageous must protect freedom." - Dwight D. Eisenhower
"Anything built by human hands can be destroyed. This is no exception." - Kei "Edge" Nagase, Ace Combat 5: The Unsung War
kgambit
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:34 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by kgambit »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Update DB3000 Loadout 27619 to include Legion IRST pod in stores</summary>
<detail>Loadout 27619 (AIM-120D, AIM-9X Block III, Legion ISRT pod; Light) is missing the Legion IRST Pod (DB3000 ID #3445; AN/ASG-34 IRST) in stores. The loadout range is currently 210nm but should probably be closer to 170nm. The medium and heavy loadouts are fine.</detail>
<evidence>
</evidence>

Hope this is the right way to do this. :)

Image
Attachments
Loadout 27169.jpg
Loadout 27169.jpg (304.1 KiB) Viewed 545 times
User avatar
KLAB
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:24 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by KLAB »

<type>Update</type>
<Summary>GBU-49 for Philippines </Summary>
<detail> GBU-49 GPS/LGB being donated to Philippines, platform wise this would most likely be for the FA-50 Golden Eagle and Ov-10D Bronco upgrade which are already in the DB3K with GBU-12, so it would be a straight copy and replace on each loadout </detail>
<evidence> https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense ... pines.html
</evidence>
deagu
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:41 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by deagu »

<Type>Add</type>
<Summary>Add C-146A Wolfhound</summary>
<detail>Mission
The C-146A Wolfhound’s primary mission is to provide U.S. Special Operations Command flexible, responsive and operational movement of small teams needed in support of Theater Special Operations Commands. Airlift missions are conducted by Air Force Special Operations Command aircrews to prepared and semi-prepared airfields around the world.

Features
The C-146A is a twin-engine, high-wing aircraft equipped with a configurable cabin capable of various passenger and cargo combinations, as well as casualty evacuation missions. The aircraft can carry a maximum of 27 troops or 6,000 pounds of cargo, or up to four litter patients.

Background
The C-146A is the military version of the Dornier 328 turboprop commuter airliner modified to permit cargo and missions. The aircraft has been continuously deployed since October 2011. It currently supports overseas contingency operations across four geographic combatant commands.

General characteristics
Primary function: flexible, rapid, intra-theater mobility for special operations forces
Builder: Dornier
Power plant: two Pratt & Whitney PW119C turboprop engines
Thrust: 2,282 max takeoff shaft horsepower per engine
Wingspan: 68 feet 10 inches (20.98 meters)
Length: 69 feet 10 inches (21.29 meters)
Height: 23 feet 9 inches (7.24 meters)
Speed: 270 knots (310 mph or 500 km/h)
Range: Approximately 1,500 nautical miles with 2,000 pounds of cargo
Ceiling: 31,000 feet
Maximum takeoff weight: 30,843 pounds
Armament: n/a
Crew: two pilots and one loadmaster
Unit cost: $17.6 million
Inventory: active duty, 20; Reserve, 0; ANG, 0

(Current as of July 2017)</detail>
<Evidence>Sources:
https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/467729/c-146a-wolfhound/
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/c-146a-wolfhound-transport-aircraft/
https://theaviationist.com/2015/12/18/c-146a-libya-trip-with-sof/
https://defence-blog.com/news/somali-terrorist-group-destroyed-u-s-spy-aircraft-in-an-attack-on-military-base-in-kenya.html</Evidence>

BDukes
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<Summary>Add Indian MH-60R 2022 x24</Summary>
<detail> India to begin deliveries of MH-60R 2021-2022. Sensors are APS-153(V) Multi-Mode radar, AN/AQS-22 ALFS Sonar and AN/AAS-44C(V) Multi-Spectral EO Targeting System. Weapons are Mk-54 Hellfire, APKWS Rocket, AN/SSQ-36/53/62 sonobuoys. </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/LMIndiaNews/status/ ... 7245654016
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major- ... elicopters
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<Summary>Add 10 Launcher US Army Patriot Battery 2020</Summary>
<detail> Add version of #3223 US using 10 launcher Patriot position in jordan. Likely missile ratio same. Make sense consider Iran and Houthi BM salvo shooting. </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/TajoTakoya/status/1 ... 8632239104
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>UPDATE</type>
<Summary>US MH-60R Sensor and Comms updates</Summary>
<detail>US MH-60R's need update due to upgrades. Radar-AN/APS-153 Radar since 2015. Include Periscope detection capability. EO/IR-Had AAS-44C(V) Multi-Spectral Targeting Systems starting in 2011-2012. MH-60S get too. MAD-New MAD called MAD-XR, Comms are Link-16 by 2006. MH-60S too. Most foreign sales get many of these too-Greece, AU, India. </detail>
<evidence>
https://www.telephonics.com/soft-gate/g ... ochure.pdf
https://tealgroup.com/index.php/teal-gr ... dar-market
https://www.deagel.com/news/n000008462
https://www.afcea.org/content/?q=taxonomy/term/4027
https://www.cae.com/news-events/press-r ... elicopters
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... submarines
https://www.militaryaerospace.com/home/ ... elicopters
https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/th ... ted-02471/
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
Broncepulido
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Broncepulido »

Casually I found this proof of clear use by USS Bunker Hill CG-55 of Standard SM-2MR Block III in 1988, and not 1990? as commonly stated. See  the 1988 PDF:

https://www.history.navy.mil/research/a ... -55-i.html

Just another grain of salt!
Also, probably a plethora of data on this site, but also probably a lot of work!
orca
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by orca »

Information on future France CVN:

PANG (Porte Avion Nouvelle Generation or new generation aircraft carrier)

estimated commissioning - 2038

Nuclear powered (CVN) with two K22 reactors (2 x 220 MW thermal)
Length between 285 and 295 meters
Full load displacement around 70,000 – 75,000 tonnes
Maximum speed: 26 to 27 knots (similar to Charles de Gaulle)
Propulsive power would be around 80 MW delivered to three or four shaft lines
Total power around 110 MW, including the electrical plant
Future air wing: 32 Next Generation Fighters with 2 to 3 E-2D Advanced Hawkeyes and a yet to be determined number of remote carriers/UCAVs
Two side elevators with 40 tonnes lifting capacity
Three 90-meter electromagnetic catapults (EMALS) by General Atomics
Flight deck: 16,000 m²
Aircraft hangar: 5,000 m²
Crew: 900 and 1080 sailors (not including the air element of 550 to 620 sailors) with higher comfort compared to Charles de Gaulle.
Thales SeaFire radar
PAAMS with MBDA ASTER surface to air missiles for self defense
RapidFire CIWS


https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... ar-powered
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”